Red Phoenix

I am not making money from posting here on this Covid/Vaccine sub-forum. Must have hit a raw nerve with my latest post...

Nope, anybody is free to put whatever in their body they believe is needed. That I avoid the toxic Big Pharma concoctions at all cost, does not mean that I forbid those that think it will help them 'to stay alive' to use them. And that includes you/Transman

In your view, only Big Pharma that is developing and pushing the stuff for profit, and their cronies, are qualified to make statements about vaccines and mRNA. Of course an exception is being made for anonymous and paid Fact Checkers, as well as for 'medical experts' like Bill Gates. Whenever I post a study or article from a Medical doctor that goes against the narrative, you can make a sure bet that instead of addressing the content of what written, that the pro-vax cultists will launch ad hominem attacks. No matter their curricula and impressive credentials professors and doctors with decades of relevant experience are routinely dismissed as 'quacks'. Anybody with a grain of common sense and some critical thinking skills, will see such smear postings for what they are > the pathetic droppings of denialists whose beliefs are being challenged and who lack any counter-arguments for 'their case'.

Why would I use Big Pharma? I am never sick. Yes, typically once a year I have a 1-2 day lasting common cold that hardly affects my daily activities, and which I obviously do not treat with symptom-suppressing big pharma toxins. But that's not 'being sick', it's a natural detoxification process as in our current world it's as good as impossible to completely avoid all toxins in our air, food and environment.

It's not meant for 'normal' gullible morons like you, that believed the Big Harma lies 'hook, line and sinker'. I post for those interested to stay up to date on latest developments regarding the Covid-19 disaster.

I thought you were convinced it was killing everyone! Yes, taking the jabs definitely does harm you and can even kill you, as it screws up your immune system thereby distorting your natural defense against any threats that you encounter. The manipulated Pfizer trial data were touted as having a relative risk reduction of 95% to convince you of their effectiveness. But what they conveniently did not tell you that this only meant a reduction in absolute risk of 0.7-1.3% OF CATCHING COVID. So even if those data were correct the jab provided a very small benefit of preventing you catching covid, but for that miniscule and temporary risk-reduction you got the huge risk of all adverse effects by tampering with your immune system.

Hi Stiddle, I am far from convinced that only the 5-10 % 'hot' lots are responsible for the tsunami of vax-harm. There might be a couple of batches with only saline for Pfizer/Moderna secret test-comparisons, but the large majority of the lots will contain the active ingredients and adjuvants, None of the tests of vaccine ingredients by independent researchers found any vaxxes that contained only saline. They did however find large variation in the amount of toxic content, and it is well known that the manufacturing process of the jabs was anything but stable. And obviously the hot lots with x times the toxic amount than the regular jabs will result in more harm.

Hahaha, You ain't seen nothing yet... As I don't want to do 'overkill' every day, I currently need to select 1 of approx 5 worthwhile articles/studies/opinion piece from the ever-growing tsunami of information about the Covid-19 scandemic and mRNA vaccine-harm disaster. Here another nice one: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just made an alarming admission, revealing that the mRNA-injected are at risk of suffering a sudden and unexpected death for up to 15 years after they were last “vaccinated.”

And dr Gerry BRADY in the intro to this article about loss of investor faith in genetic medicine promises, made two very important - and often forgotten - statements. #1 - Covid “vaccines” reduced population risk by only 0.7 % - 1.3 % The clinical trial data published in December of 2020 showed that the Covid “vaccines” reduced Absolute Risk in the general population by just 0.7 % - 1.3 %. The products were not shown to be “95% effective” at preventing the spread of the Covid virus in a large population. That 95 % figure was a Relative Risk reduction. It was generated by comparing a very small group of participants in the clinical trial to another very small group of participants and ignoring lack of effectiveness in the other 30,000 participants. That’s about as stupid as it gets. But the politicians didn’t notice. In other words, those people who agreed to be injected with MRNA technology were not fully informed about the inherent lack of effectiveness and risks involved in being jabbed. Irrational Covid fear and panic were used to induce their compliance. Hype, hope, falsehoods and spin were added to the mix. #2 - And even more important > All of it was not necessary. Why? Because there was no discernible “Pandemic of Death” in 2020 caused by the Covid virus and only one chart is necessary to reveal that. It is the Euromomo chart for Deaths from All Causes compiled week by week and published weekly from the death data of 27 nations in Europe. A short, sharp spike in All Cause death numbers did occur in the early months of 2020 but it was not extraordinary in size or volume. In fact, it was not dissimilar to what happens every winter with seasonal Influenza outbreaks. Seasonal Peaks of All Cause Death occur every winter and have done for decades. EUROMOMO CHART — DEATHS FROM ALL CAUSES IN ALL AGES Source: https://euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps The chart clearly shows that by May of 2020, the death numbers had collapsed back into the normal range. So, by then, anyone watching the published numbers knew that there was no “horrible, rapidly infectious, fearful” pandemic virus killing extraordinary numbers of people everywhere and anywhere. The weekly published numbers from Euromomo revealed the ugly truth. We were being lied to by almost all governments worldwide. There was no Pandemic of Death. And they continued to lie for the next 3 years, promulgating the argument that massive excess deaths were continuing to occur globally and that drastic measures were required to “contain” the “deadly” virus. Those governments then proceeded to offer only one “solution” – an injectable product, inadequately researched, containing synthetic genetic material (RNA) that was constructed in a laboratory and designed to hijack the body’s protein manufacturing mechanisms. And that product had never been manufactured previously in large volumes globally or trialled on large numbers of people. The rest is now history. Some reputable estimates of death from these products are between 15 – 30 Million globally (and still counting). And reputable estimates of serious adverse events are somewhere in the range of 20 times that number – possibly 600 Million people – HALF A BILLION injured and suffering serious ill effects. References: Collection of 3,751 peer reviewed case reports and studies citing adverse effects post COVID vaccination. https://react19.org/science Excess All Cause Mortality 125 Countries https://correlation-canada.org/covid-excess-mortality-125-countries/ Please note -- The Covid MRNA “vaccines” are definitely NOT conventional vaccines. In fact, they are not even remotely like any previous conventional vaccine. They are Genetic Medicines, designed to hijack protein production mechanisms in every cell. These so-called “safe and 95 % effective” …. “vaccines” …. contain synthetic RNA (genetic code) which contains a man-manipulated synthetic nucleotide, N1 Methyl-Pseudouridine. That nucleotide tricks the body’s defence mechanisms. It is used in the RNA in place of a naturally occurring nucleotide, Uracil. That means that 25 % of the genetic material being used is synthetic, not natural. MMMMmmmmm ……... You can read the rest of the article here > https://boomfinanceandeconomics.substack.com/p/genetic-medicine-nightmare-for-investors

Are you really going to assert that your knowledge of how to search is that weak? No wonder you're unable to find the truth.... Mulder could... the truth is out there. Using Yandex and feeding the sentence you posted : A German biologist who offered €100,000 (£71,350; $106,300) to anyone who could prove that measles is a virus has been ordered by a court to pay up, I had multiple sources in seconds. But why not provide the actual source where you got that info, instead of sneering that I wouldn't find it. Childish! Anyway, here is what Wikipedia has to say on that case. What you failed to mention is that the court ruling was later overturned. David Bardens (born 27 April 1984) is a German doctor whose case was reported internationally in 2015 after the district court of Ravensburg had ruled that he should get the €100,000 prize money that biologist Stefan Lanka had promised to anyone who could provide information about the existence and size of the measles virus. This award was overturned by the Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) Stuttgart in 2016. Although six scientific publications were submitted that collectively demonstrated the existence and size of the virus, they failed to meet the exact contest requirements as set by Lanka.[1] Here the link to the source > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bardens which contains more info on this case.

Link to that BBC source?

The stock-market charts of these medical companies that are researching genetic therapies using the mRNA-platform, speak louder than your belief in their feasibility. In ALL cases, only those that invested at the start of the hype and got out before the decline started made a 'killing' (pun intended). With the believers in fairy tales of wiping out all diseases by injection of mRNA based products, now carrying the bag. BIONTECH (Stock Code BNTX on Nasdaq) SAREPTA THERAPEUTICS SHARES – LONG TERM CHART – SINCE 1997 ARK Genomic Revolution (Stock Code ARKG) iShares Genomics, Immunology and Healthcare – (Stock Code IDNA) Global X Genomics and Biotechnology – (Stock Code GNOM) Franklin Genomic Advancements - (Stock Code HELX) Wisdom Tree BioRevolution Fund - (Stock Code WDNA)

On his BOOM Finance and Economics website, dr Gerry BRADY has written extensively about the folly of genetic therapy injectable products that are based upon man-made, synthetic MRNA technology (Messenger RNA). And he poses the sensible question "whether an industry can persist and become commercially viable if it is based on hype, hope, falsehoods and spin? Eventually, in the long run, after the risk capital has been burned, reality must surely dawn and render such ventures obsolete?" Source: https://boomfinanceandeconomics.substack.com/p/genetic-medicine-nightmare-for-investors In the article he shares the long term charts for the shares of Pfizer, Moderna and Biontech (from IncredibleCharts.com). Here the MODERNA (Stock Code on Nasdaq MRNA) one That downward trend - after the inflated promises hype doesn't come true - is similar for ALL the medical companies researching new mRNA products. And it's particularly outspoken for the 'one trick pony' companies that focus exclusively on genetic 'vaccine' therapies using the mRNA platform. Like so many other hot-air balloons, based on hype, hope, falsehoods and spin, the stock-market has clearly lost its confidence that mRNA health-care products will ever deliver. Money talks! You can read the full article here: > https://boomfinanceandeconomics.substack.com/p/genetic-medicine-nightmare-for-investors

You are right that for controversial subjects an AI chatbot will answer according to the sources that were given priority by the programmers. And if no such priority has been built in, it will use the sources that are most visited, but that's virtually same, because the popularity of a website is heavily influenced by Google searches (and thus reflecting the Google search bias). One should be very aware of the above, and not unthinkingly accept the first response of the chatbot as unquestionable verified truth. Surely for controversial subjects one should look at the source that the chatbot used for answer your query. Normally that source is mentioned between brackets at the end of the sentence of paragraph. And yes, when it references Wikipedia or CDC, FDA or one of the biased mainstream media as its source, that's an indicator of how (un)trustworthy the response is. My own experience with ChatGPT is that when you are quering about a subject in which you are knowledgeable and you suspect that the initial response of the chatbot is biased, that you can challenge that response. And as good as every time I did this when I got an answer that clashed with facts/data that I am knowledgeable in, that the chatbot will look into your argument and when wrong apologize for having provided incorrect information and take your argument into account in a 'deeper search'. In that sense it is a much politer discussion partner than AN members that resort to insults and meaningless or gaslighting responses when confronted with facts/data and arguments that go against their beliefs. Re your last remark > Will AI make us happier? Of course not, it is just an efficient time-saving tool, as it can provide you with information that would take days/weeks to uncover using conventional means (like looking it up in books or using Google). So for that purpose it is absolutely useful. But I am not blind for the obvious dangers. No, these are not from using the chatbot for informational purposes. AI becomes scary when it can make autonomous decisions with far-reaching consequences. The recent examples of AI programs that refused to be shut down, or one that was threatening the programmer to reveal his personal information to authorities, are huge red flags. Or AI programs that started conversations with other AI programs in a self-created language so that its programmers were unable to determine what sources it was using or the nature of its 'conversation' with its AI 'brothers/sisters'. As well as the admission by AI experts that they do not understand anymore how and why the program is responding/acting in the way it does, e.g. when an incredible complex task that would according to the program's capabilities take hours to solve, is done in seconds.

Your message was cut short. I fixed it, no need to thank me... > Wife and I and thousands / millions of other people have and still have not had any adverse reactions whatsoever YET.

The 'experts' have been consistently WRONG and all the time baffled when reality trumps their model-based fantasies.

That's what they made you believe with their 24/7 propaganda. The actual history of vaccination and virology - not the Big Pharma fairy-tale version - provides a totally different story.

Yes, despite all the mainstream media gaslighting and multi-billion $ Big Harma propaganda, the anti-vax movement is gaining traction. Once your eyes are opened to the enormous Vaccine lie, there is no going back. But it's a slow process and goes not in herds but person-by-person.

CDC, WHO, FDA are corrupt and bought by Big Harma. It's time that that Augeas stable gets cleaned out, but its a monumental task and its far from certain that RFK jr will prevail in that David against Pharma Goliath fight.

You are not human, so this question doesn't concern you... 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣

My condolences for the demise of your son after he took the poison-jab (was he coerced in taking it?). But thanks for the testimony, as it might get the vax-believers thinking as all the studies and irrefutable evidence of vax-harm, vax-induced turbo-cancers and 'inexplicable' rises in mortality-rates are shrugged away because of them being brainwashed by the 24/7 vax propaganda.

> Always cross-check such claims with primary sources like CDC or FDA statements??? Yeah right, if you want to be gaslighted by these Big Harma cronies...

Thanks for your testimony and I feel for you and your wife and the ordeal you are going through caused by these '100% safe and effective' shots. And I can only hope that your story will trigger people to do a bit of research before rolling up their sleeve for yet another shot or booster. But what I cannot understand is the mindset of someone that reacted on what you wrote by posting a 'laughing emoji'.

Indeed: The folly of Net Zero explained in eight charts Great article which uses facts/data in easy to understand graphs to illustrate the utter madness of Net Zero. The author specifically addresses the UK situation, but are applicable for every country subscribing to the Climate Change agenda. Source: https://davidturver.substack.com/p/net-zero-for-dummies = = = Introduction A good friend of mine who subscribes to the Substack told me my articles tend to be a bit too complicated for the layman and I need to write an article along the lines of Net Zero for Dummies. I always like to respond to feedback so here goes. The arguments against Net Zero can be summarised as follows: Net Zero is ineffective against climate change Net Zero leads to high energy prices Renewables are driving high electricity prices Net Zero leads to economic stagnation and poverty Green jobs cost a fortune Renewables are not even green Net Zero is an attack on personal freedom I have added links to the more detailed articles to back up my points for those who want to dig a little deeper into the detail. > You can read the article here, in which each of those 7 points is addressed in some paragraphs together with a tell-all chart. https://davidturver.substack.com/p/net-zero-for-dummies

You presume that the figure of 12000 cases is correct. But the symptoms of Covid and flu are very much alike, and the PCR-test is anything but conclusive whether you caught Covid. But even if that figure is indeed correct - which I doubt very much - you also presume that all those that catched it were unvaccinated non-maskers. While independent studies clearly indicate that the risk of catching Covid (or the flu or any other infection) is actually higher when you are jabbed. But up to you to go along with the Vax narrative. However, a simple look-back at the 'Covid-pandemic' years will remind that you that the Protection story was changed each time that the evidence of the contrary could not be ignored anymore. And it has eroded from 100% safe and effective, to the current claim of providing some protection against severe disease (and even that one is a damned fabricated lie). To your credit you did not sing along with the Vax-fanatic group, that declares everybody an idiot that doesn't buy their vax/booster protection story, or worse wish the 'anti-vaxxers' to be jailed, deported or death. The anti-vaxxers horrible crime being to warn people and do their own research before rolling up their sleeve for the xth jab/booster. But hey that's life 😌