Red Phoenix

You presume that the figure of 12000 cases is correct. But the symptoms of Covid and flu are very much alike, and the PCR-test is anything but conclusive whether you caught Covid. But even if that figure is indeed correct - which I doubt very much - you also presume that all those that catched it were unvaccinated non-maskers. While independent studies clearly indicate that the risk of catching Covid (or the flu or any other infection) is actually higher when you are jabbed. But up to you to go along with the Vax narrative. However, a simple look-back at the 'Covid-pandemic' years will remind that you that the Protection story was changed each time that the evidence of the contrary could not be ignored anymore. And it has eroded from 100% safe and effective, to the current claim of providing some protection against severe disease (and even that one is a damned fabricated lie). To your credit you did not sing along with the Vax-fanatic group, that declares everybody an idiot that doesn't buy their vax/booster protection story, or worse wish the 'anti-vaxxers' to be jailed, deported or death. The anti-vaxxers horrible crime being to warn people and do their own research before rolling up their sleeve for the xth jab/booster. But hey that's life 😌

Then tell me why #1 - a group of top Japanese lawmakers, medical experts, and investigators would make the effort to provide access to a government database covering millions of Covid-vaccinated citizens #2 - one of Japan’s most highly respected professors - Prof dr Yasufumi MURAKAMI - would risk his career and reputation, by warning the public about what his analysis of the data revealed. These scientists/researchers have nothing to gain from exposing these data. On the contrary they have everything to lose by doing so, and many scientists/researchers worldwide have already paid a very high price for their scientific integrity.

LOL.... your assumptions about my educational background are completely wrong. But unlike yourself I will not brag about it as my background is totally irrelevant for the topic we are discussing.

So you actually CONFIRM each and every point made by @sungod and then come with some lame excuses about job/reputation protection, insufficient knowledge, possible intentional lies. And Pfizer/Moderna knew all this beforehand, but the opportunity to make billions of dollars - without any liability - was to tempting and now 1.5 billion mRNA jabs have been administered, which were neither safe, effective or even necessary. Heads must roll for this Larget Crime to Humanity ever.

With the eVisa system, which has now been rolled out to all Thai embassies/consulates worldwide, you cannot apply anymore for a Non Imm O Visa in another country than your home-country. But you can still apply - besides from your home-country - at a Thai Immigration office in the province where you are and plan to stay. So you could enter Thailand VisaExempt or on a Tourist Visa and then apply for the 90-day Non Imm O Visa at a local Thai Imm Office. Unfortunately, if you would be using the Funds in Bank method (800K when opting to apply for reason of Retirement), it would be difficult - but not entirely impossible - to meet the financial requirement as the funds need to be on a personal Thai bank account at the moment of application. But for a foreigner opening a Bank-account, the Bank requires that you are already on a long-term stay Visa. So that's a Catch-22. But as this is Thailand, you could make use of a Visa Agent that uses his connections to open a Bank-Account in your personal name. And once you have the Bank-account you can transfer the required funds from your foreign Bank-account to that Thai bank-account. Note that when applying for the 90-day Non Imm O Visa that the funds only need to be on your personal Thai bank-account at the moment of application. And it is when applying for the 1-year extension of that Non Imm O Visa, that you need to show that the funds have been seasoned for 2 months on that Thai bank-account.

Although not many members here agree with @Stiddle Mump's posts which go far beyond the topic of vax-harm, on the subject of the experimental mRNA shots the current US administration is not convinced that these jabs are safe (to put it mildly). Hence the title of this thread: White House insiders say the MRNA shot will be pulled from the market

An expensive treatment at Bumrungrad hospital...

You are probably referring to the 8-page Open Letter that dr Malhotra posted on his website https://doctoraseem.com/ in which he makes the case that there is overwhelming evidence that calls for the suspension of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (which, by technicality, is a genetic therapy) because of serious harms. And here the direct link to that Open Letter > https://doctoraseem.com/thousands-of-doctors-sign-petition-to-suspend-covid-mrna-vaccines-an-open-letter-to-the-gmc/

And thus perfectly safe to have it injected into your body... 😅

... but not as safe as a pure saline shot, as the Sinovac vaccine also contains alum (aluminum hydroxide) as an adjuvant. And safest is of course > NO injections

For those interested in the full interview by dr John Campbell with cardiologist dr Aseem Malhotra, in which Malhotra made that statement, here the link: > https://odysee.com/@AwakenWiki:c/Dr-John-Campbell-Interviews-Dr-Aseem-Malhotra-Some-big-questions

> In other words: strengthen your God-given immune system. And avoid the shots that by-pass your body's outer defense system by injecting the stuff that will then trick your body in creating responses to the poison or cell-instructions it receives.

It refers to all Covid 'vaccines' using the mRNA platform. So that's all the mRNA jabs (like Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna) that deliver genetic instructions (mRNA) into your cells, which then produce the spike protein internally.

Wait and see, but this is great news when true!

Talking about 'extremists'...

Pretty much everyone agrees that you sure do 'alloy' your one-liner posts with iron-clad nonsense, insults and non-sequitur.

Am I abusing 'data for ill meant purposes' by posting the aim and actual conclusions of the Italian study that you mentioned?

The retraction of the study you are referring to does NOT refer to the current thread, the member who posted it thought it was about the Japanese 18 million vaccinated database that the current thread is addressing, but what he posted referred to another Japanese study that was published and then retracted by the publisher (not by the authors, by the way).

You are lucky, as I just responded to @Hummin 's post, where the crux lies in this ITB issue. The original post of the researchers in the study that Hummin posted, did not take that bias into consideration and led them to make incorrect conclusions. And here their conclusion after they did take ITB into consideration. We found all-cause death risks to be even higher for those vaccinated with one and two doses compared to the unvaccinated and that the booster doses were ineffective. We also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3/4 doses. Let the raucous laughter begin... > https://aseannow.com/topic/1364152-japan-prof-dr-yasufumi-murakami-the-more-doses-you-get-the-sooner-you’re-likely-to-die/page/3/#findComment-19885840

In your post you wrote that this large Italian study conducted in the province of Pescara, showed that 'receiving three or more vaccine doses resulted in a substantially lower risk of death, than receiving only one or two doses' . That would be a good argument for the fully vaxxed 'to get their booster'. But although that is indeed a finding of the study, it is by no means the main conclusion. The aim of the study was 'to verify the real impact of the vaccination campaign by comparing the risk of all-cause death between the vaccinated population and the unvaccinated population'. So how are the unvaccinated doing mortality-wise versus the vaccinated? In the Introduction the study mentions: With 2 and even with 3/4 doses, the calculated Restricted Mean Survival Time and Restricted Mean Time Lost have shown a small but significant downside for the vaccinated populations. And their overall conclusion (very last paragraph of the study) reads: We found all-cause death risks to be even higher for those vaccinated with one and two doses compared to the unvaccinated and that the booster doses were ineffective. We also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with 2 or 3/4 doses. Note that I am aware that you posted this study to make the point that science is always open for new findings. The original study showed that the group who received at least a booster dose had an unlikely significantly lower risk of all-cause death versus the unvaccinated. But the correction of ITB allowed the researchers to eliminate remarkable distortions due to this bias. Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11278956/

The Japanese created a database in which they entered the health records of 18 million vaccinated people, and that database is accessible for researchers to conduct studies on the data. One of them being prof dr MURAKAMI. As mentioned in an earlier response, also Ed DOWD, an ex-Blackrock data analyst, analysed the available US records (e.g. from life and health insurance companies) and came to similar conclusions.

I don't speak/read Japanese but this X-post should point you to the source. >

Read the 3 postings in the thread addressing the database with the records of 18 million vaccinated Japanese people database that was analyzed by prof MURAKAMI.

The article that you mention as retracted does NOT refer to the current post. Try to keep up...