Red Phoenix

The point is that injecting a substance with a needle by-passes your natural outer protective body-mechanisms.

So what you are actually saying is that you need a formal medical degree or qualification, to make common sense statements. Another BS one...

Let's start with the common sense one: When we’re talking about vaccines, we are talking about taking chemicals, metals, proteins, and more—and injecting them right into the bloodstream—and then acting shocked when people develop serious issues—or worse, death—from such a procedure. But, but, science scientism... And now the BS one: In 2013, Congressman Bill Posey asked the CDC on record why they haven’t done a simple vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study. The CDC responded: “It would be unethical to withhold vaccines from children in order to study outcomes.” Case closed... = = = Inspired by Franklin O'Kanu and his Unorthodoxy website...

True, but the full phrase is: Correlation does not imply causation, whereas, causation frequently occurs with correlation. When an imminent oncologist like prof dr Angus Dalgleish comes to the conclusion that there is a correlation between being Covid mRNA-boosted and rapidly developing cancers, that professional opinion of him does not come from 'attending the funerals of 4 of his friends'. Rather it is based on: 1 - what he has observed in his patients, that had stable cancers which suddenly and quickly re-emerged after the shots, and were not reacting anymore to previously stabilizing therapies; 2 - conversations/discussions with oncologist colleagues, that off-the-record confirmed encountering the same in their practices. Depicting Dalgleish as a loony and deluded anti-vaxxer, is simply pathetic. Yes, Masked Bulldog, I am referring to you...

Why Do Vaccines Cause Autism? Past discoveries that can help us understand the current wave of neurological injuries and the silence surrounding them Source: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vaccines-cause-autism = = = One of the most challenging things for me throughout my time in the medical field has been watching children become neurologically damaged by vaccines, and the widespread blindness of the medical profession to this issue. Unfortunately, because so much money has been spent to engineer the societal belief that vaccines do not cause autism, anyone who asserts otherwise is immediately subject to widespread ridicule, to the point it’s mostly a lost cause to convince medical professionals vaccines aren’t always safe. Sadly, in many cases, the only thing that can open their eyes is their own child being severely injured. Since one of the central reasons the autism-vaccine link has always been dismissed is that there’s no established mechanism to explain how vaccines could cause autism, this article will focus on that question and why there has been so much resistance to understanding what is behind the autism epidemic. Note: this is a significantly revised and updated version of a previously published article. > The lengthy and very worthwhile article then delves deep into the possible mechanisms that link vaccines to autism, and at the end of the article a Midwestern Doctor recaps: 1. Contrary to popular belief, there is actually a great deal of compelling evidence linking vaccines to autism. 2. There is presently no accepted explanation for what is causing the explosion of autism we are facing. 3. The only solution that’s been offered for autism is more care services (Peter Hotez even cites money being diverted from those care services into looking at the causes of autism as why it is so unconscionable for anyone to link vaccines to autism)—something that is not sustainable as the numbers of autistic children keep increasing. 4. The explosion of autism is one of the costliest diseases facing our country, so decades of hand waving that has insisted there’s no scientifically valid explanation for this explosion simply doesn’t cut it. Fortunately, for the existing PR system to work, it has to have a monopoly on all sources of information so that its absurd narratives can always remain unchallenged. While that was long the case, over the last few years, that monopoly has broken, in part due to recent political shifts inviting widespread skepticism of the media (e.g., everyone being lied to about the COVID vaccines) and in part due to the internet more and more enabling the free diffusion of information. That, in short, is why RFK Jr. is now able to conduct a real investigation into the causes of autism that should have been done decades ago but never was and why each of us must use our voice to make sure he is able to conduct that investigation. Source: : https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vaccines-cause-autism

The short article - more a personal professional reflection - by prof dr Angus Dalgleish seems to have struck a raw nerve with the boosted. The posted comments range from hysterical denial over non-sequitur to insult/ridicule. Of course, deep down those posters know that 'something is off' but when one of the world's most eminent cancer-doctors like Dalgleish tells it like it is, they need to rationalize or ridicule his message away. But hopefully it will make them think twice before rolling up their sleeve to get another mRNA booster. And those that were already 'on the fence' (often because of the first symptoms of vax-harm they are experiencing), could start a detox-cure. Several protocols have been developed to stop or even reverse the continual poisoning of that Gift that keeps on giving. Wishing everybody a Joyful Easter.

Former FDA Commissioners Are Employed At All 3 FDA-Authorized COVID Shot Companies Full story here > https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/conflict-of-interest-former-fda-commissioners-are-employed-at-all-3-fda-authorized-covid-shot-companies/

by prof dr Angus DALGLEISH - April 10, 2025 Angus Dalgleish is an expert in immunology and Professor of Oncology at St George's Hospital Medical School, London. = = = I HAVE just returned from the funeral of yet another friend who has died from an explosive cancer for which there was no known risk. He developed several metastases from a melanoma that he never knew he had and for which there was no primary lesion to spread from. His presentation and development, including resistance to a new immunotherapy regimen that is effective in more than 80 per cent of patients, was very similar to two other friends who developed bone metastases at the same time, as well another friend who developed a ‘turbo-charged’ (as his doctor called it) lymphoma. Only one of the doctors who treated my friends, I was told, asked about their patients’ covid vaccine histories. The one who did was forthright in telling my friend that this was almost certainly the cause as he was seeing dozens of similar cases. Shockingly, all four patients had the boosters only so they could travel overseas and be covered by insurance! This sad reflection is heightened by the email and text messages I have recently received from my GP telling me ‘to stay safe and get my spring booster’. No waiting list for that. Meanwhile, the NHS has taken two years so far to get me on a waiting list for what was non-urgent surgery but which will soon become so at this rate! ... Source: https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/funeral-of-a-friend-who-had-the-covid-booster-and-developed-raging-cancer/

Good to learn about your personal hygiene, but I wonder what this has to do with the topic discussed.

Nearly 30,000 people were surveyed. You had a 6X greater risk of hospitalization post vaccine than post infection. This is a disaster and should cause the vaccines to be revoked in any sane society. Source: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/breaking-new-ucsf-study-shows-vaccinated = = = Executive summary A new UCSF study has now been published on a preprint server. The key result is absolutely mind blowing. The risk ratio (RR) for hospitalization in vaccinated COVID-naïve individuals vs. unvaccinated post-infection individuals is: RR = 5.89 95% Confidence Interval: [4.80, 7.22] This means individuals were nearly 6 times more likely to be hospitalized after COVID vaccination than unvaccinated individuals were to be hospitalized after a COVID infection. Why didn’t the CDC let us know any of this? I was certainly not told any of this by the CDC, my doctor, or the media. The paper Bhargava (2025), Postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 in the population: Risk factors and vaccines < https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-6175467/v1 >

Best Easter Present Ever! Some - including myself - were already somewhat despairing that the Covid vax-criminals would dodge accountability and once again get away scot-free. And worse: they are or were already preparing for a repeat. But looks like it finally started... The Bad Cat - El gato malo - put it very eloquently on his substack: Source: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/breaking-news-here-it-comes = = = Some excerpts: i had been wondering about the odd uptick in “claims the covid vaxx saved lives” and the “we did the best we could with what we knew” justification over the last week or two. now we know. the white house just blew the war trumpets on the covid conspirators. oh man do i hope that this is what it looks like… i have not yet been through this in detail, but in the interest of “let’s get many eyes on it ASAP,” you guys need to go check out whitehouse.gov right now. this is quite a seismic changing of the guard. ... and after what we all endured in the time covdian and the corrupt “public health” agencies, even if this is not new news to those of discerning cattitudes, it’s still a moment to savor and a sign of how far we have come. ... tony baloney may have gotten a pass (assuming a pre-emptive pardon holds, which is a questionable idea) but the rest of the rogues did not. collins, debbie “the scarf” birx, daszak, baric, health hobbit hotez, and many others at FDA, CDC, NIH, WHO, EHA, CIA, CISA and who knows how many NGOs and other shady government funded orgs who sought to silence so many of us. as these networks roll up, the role of china, the WEF, the brandon administration, gates, the WHO, and an absolute laundry list of alleged academics is going to come out. and won’t that be fun? time to dig and to hold to account. so here we go again. as ever, proud to have stood with so many of you on rational ground. i have neither forgotten nor forgiven those who did this, only become more adamant in my desire to ensure that they may never do it again. time to finish the work. Full article with links to clips of the White House Press conference and more: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/breaking-news-here-it-comes

A good night's sleep will cure that condition, but whether it will wake you up remains to be seen...

Yes, I fully agree and recommend to those that agree with what you wrote to read Schopenhauer’s short essay, “On Thinking for Yourself” > https://luctalks.substack.com/p/arthur-schopenhauer-on-thinking-for

And the US even announced earlier than President Millei of Argentina, that they would exit the who. > As of April 2025, the United States has initiated the process to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO). On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14155, directing the withdrawal of the U.S. from the WHO. The order cites dissatisfaction with the WHO's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, its failure to adopt necessary reforms, and concerns about the organization's independence from political influences of member states. Additionally, the order mentions the perceived unfair financial contributions required from the U.S. The United Nations has confirmed that the U.S. will officially leave the WHO on January 22, 2026, following a one-year notice period as stipulated by the organization's regulations. In the interim, the U.S. has ceased participation in WHO negotiations, including discussions on the global pandemic treaty, and has recalled all U.S. personnel working with the organization. This withdrawal marks the second attempt by the U.S. to exit the WHO; the first, initiated in 2020, was reversed by the Biden administration. The current decision is expected to have significant implications, as the U.S. is the WHO's largest financial contributor, providing approximately 18% of its funding. My comment > So in effect, although formally still a WHO-member, the US has effectively exited the WHO and broken all official ties with that horrible organization.

Hi Rumak, I first looked up Argentina, as President Millei - like Trump - clearly stated when he became President that Argentina would leave the WHO. > So as of April 2025, Argentina has announced its intention to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO), but the formal exit process has not yet been completed. On February 5, 2025, President Javier Milei's government declared the decision, citing "profound differences regarding health management, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic." A presidential spokesperson emphasized that Argentina would not allow an international organization to intervene in its sovereignty, particularly concerning health matters . The Argentine government contends that this move will provide greater flexibility to implement health policies tailored to the country's needs. They also assert that Argentina does not receive funding from the WHO, so the withdrawal will not affect the quality of its health services While the announcement has been made, the formal withdrawal process requires further steps, and as of now, Argentina remains a member of the WHO. My comment > When Argentina has not exited by end of May, that might provide President Millei with the opportunity - being still a WHO member - to provide comments on that 'Pandemic Agreement' during the WHO's May 17-26 meeting where that Agreement would be ratified. Would be some nice fireworks!

Analysis of the Approved Draft of the Pandemic Treaty Source: https://merylnass.substack.com/p/analysis-of-the-approved-draft-of = = = Here the link to the final treaty draft: https://www.keionline.org/wp-content/uploads/Proposal_for_WHO_Pandemic_Agreement_E-Onscreen-16-April-2025-at-01_57-CEST.docx.pdf And Meryl NASS, after reviewing the full draft, had some good news as the document has been almost stripped completely of its original 'blanco check' content for the WHO ... BOTTOM LINE: This version of the treaty does not commit any nation to doing anything it does not want to do. Nor does it promise nations anything of value: no privileges or benefits. You might be lucky and get some free or cheap vaccine or drugs if manufacturers agree in future to give them away. All the controversial areas have been kicked down the road. There is nothing binding in this document that is a problem for nations. If this was the level of agreement at 3.5 years, we can assume they won’t get much further over the next few years. The US and Argentina will be out. I imagine all the nations will approve this document, since it is virtually meaningless, only providing a skeleton —which the globalists hope can be dressed up later with the awful provisions. But since the globalists just had their biggest funding stream turned off (USAID) they made no attempt to use bribery to gain agreement on more restrictive provisions. Never say never, but I am very relieved. You can read her full analysis here > https://merylnass.substack.com/p/analysis-of-the-approved-draft-of

This is from the Change.org petition from 8 years ago. 2,886 people signed the petition to have Thompson testify. It didn’t matter. Our Congress does not want anyone to learn the truth. Not a single member of Congress is calling for Thompson to testify about how he was ORDERED to destroy all evidence linking the MMR vaccine and autism. Source: https://www.change.org/p/congress-subpoena-cdc-vaccine-whistleblower-dr-william-thompson-to-testify-before-congress

A Doubling of Children with Severe Disabilities It isn't "just" autism Source: https://www.malone.news/p/a-doubling-of-children-with-severe Excerpts from dr Malone's article posted below = = = Secretary Kennedy gave his first press conference, which was focused on autism. Although what he had to say was immediately vilified by mainstream media, he didn’t say anything completely wrong or was an untruth. In fact, the word vaccine never left his mouth. The big elephant in the room with autism research is that in 2013, the DSM-5, or Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, which is the primary classification system for mental health conditions used by clinicians and researchers in the United States, decided to broaden the definition of autism to include those who have what they previously called “subtypes” of autism compiled into what is now known as “autism spectrum disorder” (ASD) and removed autism as a stand-alone diagnostic from the DSM-5. Over the late 20th and then early 21st century, some researchers began to question whether autism was a spectrum. In 1994, the definition of autism expanded in the DSM-IV - to include conditions once considered separate from autism. In 2013, The various subtypes (including Asperger’s syndrome) were unified under the single diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), explicitly framing autism as a continuous spectrum. As herein lies the rub. No data shows that these “subtypes” have the same patterns of behavior or even the exact etiology. ... The consequence of combining multiple disorders or syndromes into a single diagnosis was a significant increase in autism cases since 1994. This is not to say that the percentage of autism hasn’t grown - it has, but it can also be true that the new ASD criteria also increased documented cases. ... Beyond the question of autism, why have the rates of children with disabilities doubled over the past fifty years? It is hard to believe this is all due to better diagnoses and reporting. Secretary Kennedy is right. Something or things is (are) poisoning our children. It is making them susceptible to diseases, as well as chronic conditions, all of which can lead to less quality of life and even early death. Furthermore, these environmental toxins are causing neurologic damage. There is a compounding effect of so many toxins and insults to the brain resulting in neuroinflammation, which leads to neurological development issues (see my past substack here on glyphosate). This can happen in the developing fetus and the child. This is unacceptable. Mainstream media, big pharma, big food, big Ag can scream, they can threaten, they can even try to get Secretary Kennedy fired, but in the end, they have to step out of the way and let HHS do its job. = = =

You can watch the 9' clip from yesterday's press conference in which RFK jr made these statements, here: https://x.com/EncounterNewsX/status/1912594241827877365

Not only do the slow kill bio-weapon “vaccines” genetically modify the recipients into walking spike protein factories with suppressed p53 tumor antigen protein responsible for keeping cancers at bay, but these poisonous injections also induce IgG4-related disease, which results in systemic inflammation. This IgG4 disease is the foundational component of VAIDS, and lays the groundwork for weakening the immune system such that it cannot combat the broad range of other “vaccine” induced symptoms like (SV40-promotor-sequence-induced) turbo cancers, prion-based diseases, and so on and so forth. And now we have more irrefutable evidence that this IgG4 condition is all too real in the “vaccinated;” to wit: New Preprint just published, 15 Apr 2025, Japanese Scientists find repeated vaccination with mRNA COV-19 Vaccines induce high IgG4 levels, promoting cancer growth by suppressing cancer immunity and is associated with poor prognosis in Pancreatic Cancer Survival ... You can read the full article here (including the link to and excerpts from the Japanese study): https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/bombshell-repeated-mrna-cov-19-vaccination

As evidenced by a number of the posters on this forum (and in this thread) - I think the rates of autism used to be higher ! The autism rate continues increasing relentlessly, now up to 1 in 12.5 boys in the most recent California survey

By Dr. Vernon Coleman The enthusiasm for vaccination is probably the most unscientific aspect of health care. It is more akin to quackery than anything relating to science. Vaccines are not adequately tested before being used and no tests are done to see if vaccines are compatible with one another or with other prescription drugs. No long-term tests are done to see how much the immune system is affected. And, perhaps most bizarrely of all, the same dose of a vaccine is given to all adults (and even in some cases to children). The same dose is given to men and women, young and old, fat and thin. No attempt is ever made to alter the size of a vaccine dose according to the size of a patient. It is well known that size and age are significant factors in all aspects of health care but doctors make no account of these differences. No one checks to see if diseases such as cancer are commoner among the vaccinated than the non-vaccinated. The assumption is that vaccines are good and anyone who asks questions must, without debate, be branded an anti vaxxer – which is considered by some in the establishment to be a form of terrorism. (Actually, of course, no attempt is made to balance dosage against weight or age with most drugs. So, for example, the same, standardised dose of antibiotic will be given to an 18-year-old woman weighing 7 stone as will be given to a 45-year-old man weighing 28 stone or a 90-year-old woman weighing 6 stone. You don’t have to understand much about medicine or science or the human body to realise that this is unscientific. Indeed, it is lunacy. It is hardly surprising that doctors are now recognised as being one of the three main causes of illness and death.) I consider it absurd and grotesquely unscientific that no one has ever done trials to test different doses of vaccine with different weights and sizes of patient. No medical doctor or scientist can possibly endorse the prescribing of vaccines as they are used at the moment. Source: www.vernoncoleman.com = = =

This does NOT mean that it has been adopted. The World Health Assembly will consider the Pandemic Agreement when it meets May 17-26, 2025. Each nation can decide whether or not to sign the agreement. But the text of the WHO'S proposal which is now up for signing, is truly terrifying! When it gets adopted, the World Health Organization will have handed itself sweeping powers over how countries respond to future health emergencies. And it would be a legally binding pandemic treaty. The BBC says it’s to prevent “disorganization” next time. But what it really means is this: the WHO now claims authority over global supply chains, vaccine roll-outs, and disease surveillance—run by an unelected body with zero accountability. The treaty ties directly into the IHR rules - thanks to Biden who pushed for International Health Regulation (IHR) amendments - , which define “health products” as practically everything—vaccines, diagnostics, gene-based therapies, antidotes, PPE, and more. The WHO wants power over it all. Worse, the treaty demands 24/7 surveillance, censorship of so-called “misinformation,” and mandatory funding, forcing nations to bankroll their own medical prison. And just before this treaty is finalized, Fauci reappears, warning of another deadly respiratory virus. Why do they always show up right before the next “emergency”? And at the same time, the FDA quietly approved new H5N1 vaccines. It's coming folks... and it will be too late when that WHO 'Pandemic Agreement' gets adopted by your country. Not only should countries refuse to sign that proposal, but they need to EXIT the WHO. Not later. NOW. The text can be accessed here: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-text-of-the-who-pandemic-agreement And the comments on what it means came from a Vigilant Fox article.