Jeff the Chef

Just a shame it's not Hamas going to see the ICJ

I take it you mean this answer? Black South Africa doesn't like Israel , Israel were friendly with White South Africa, pre Mandela

Oh, how I laughed. Can't bring yourself to answer the question, shame on you.

For your information, the Judge is not singular, it is the 15 Judges of the International Court of Justice, plus one from both sides, so there is a possibility of 17 Judges.

Nice quote Bkk Brian, ever considered answering the question posed? Who is South Africa bringing proceedings against?

Would you care to enlighten me on what the hell you're talking about?

You said: I see the eradication of Hamas as the best way. =Them You said: Others see the eradication of Israel as a better means. =Them Call me a liar all you want, it only shows your lack of understanding the way I feel about the situation. Yes, I will carry on as you say.

Your safe in your first sentence, the killing must stop. Then it all falls on it's arris, and there's the problem, them or them, no middle ground, and no I do not have the answers to this, before anyone asks.

Neither.

Whatever you thing is irrelevant it will be up to the Justices to determine the evidence presented by both parties to the Application.

So now it's a sham case according to you, I'm sure you will be called by the Israeli legal team to give your evidence of such.

Who is South Africa bringing proceedings against?

Whatever.

So you post more rubbish trying to muddy the waters, typical.

What I'm saying, ad infinitum is it is Israel that has been brought before the International Court of Justice, not Hamas. I have no doubt that Israel will site Hamas as the cause of the War, that is their prerogative, but until the Court confines neither you or I or anybody else knows what will be said.

Gordon Bennett, for the last time, It is up to the Court to determine if Israel has anything to answer for from the Application Instituting Proceedings, at this moment in time there is no proof of anything only an Application before the Court. We won't know anymore until the Court convenes on the 11th January 2024.

Yes I have, I will admit to not getting a lot of it, so you just have to keep at it for a better understanding, try it.

Did you, please show, or we can put it down as more "waffle" from Morch.

As I've said to you before and I'll say it again: It is not up to me or anybody else to determine guilt or innocence at the ICJ, it is up to the Judges.

Do you? Care to explain your take on it?

Where does your post make the same point that I posted? My post: It is not up to me or anybody else to determine guilt or innocence at the ICJ, it is up to the Judges.

I acknowledge nothing about Hamas, where do you get that from? I have no doubt that Israel will bring Hamas up during the Application Instituting Proceedings on the 11th. I suggest you read the full 84 page Application.

When you're in a hole maybe it is time to stop digging. Rejection of Irresponsible Statements on Resettlement of Palestinians Outside of Gaza https://www.state.gov/rejection-of-irresponsible-statements-on-resettlement-of-palestinians-outside-of-gaza/

The last 2 paragraph's of your linked article: But Israel’s defense will be haunted by the remarks of Dichter and company, who South Africa cites in their ICJ filing. Despite Netanyahu’s plea, they have not stopped their commentary, and on Tuesday, the U.S. State Department singled out two far-right Israeli ministers who have been pushing to resettle Palestinians outside Gaza, blasting their “inflammatory and irresponsible” rhetoric. Netanyahu may thus have cause to regret not bringing his coalition partners to heel more firmly.

Living a great life on the Gaza Riviera, yes they were alive, just.