Cameroni

Thank you . You can call me Don Cameroni. Who's to say where I'm from? Or where I'm going? Many have speculated and paid a high price.

This is what Hitler was hoping in his bunker, that Stalin would die. If that's you're best hope, then I don't think Ukraine has much hope. This notion that the Russians would roll over if Putin were to die is based on ignorance of the Russian Psyche. They would see things through to the end. If Russia were forced to deploy a nuclear device on Ukraine, the West would not retaliate with nuclear weapons. Because it knows that would be the end of the world, including their world.

It will just be a pile of investigative interviews, many filled with lies, mostly redacted heavily so as not to identify anyone. it's not going to be as exciting as everyone thinks.

Why would I be scared? There's nothing to be scared of. The vast majority of material has already been released as the judge recently found. Congress has requested all documents and communications from the case files of Epstein and Maxwell. It also demanded records about communications between Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration and the Justice Department regarding Epstein, as well as documents related to an earlier federal investigation into Epstein in Florida that resulted in a non-prosecution agreement. What Congress will not see is the testimony by Ghislaine Maxwell nor the Grand jury transcripts from the two actual Epstein cases. So it's basically one giant regurgitation effort. Nothing new will come out. The really interesting thing is the Ghislaine Maxwell transcript and the Grand Jury transcripts. None of which will be made available yet.

I'm afraid that's not how it works. If you claim there is such video evidence then it is YOU who is under the obligation to produce it. Good luck. Let me know when you have it. Lol.

For further evidence about how Sara Ransome is one of the most abject, shameless and voluminous liars the courts have ever seen, see this report here: "No evidence of the tapes, which Ms Ransome claimed in the emails that her friend possessed and she had copied, has ever emerged. Referring to the New Yorker report, a spokesperson for Sir Richard's Virgin Group said on Monday: "We can confirm that Sarah Ransome's claims are baseless and unfounded."" https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-67918708 Remember, this Sara Ransome received a payment of millions by Jeffrey Epstein to just shut up. Ovbiously she got a taste for money and started to make up more and more lies, including that she slept with Alan Dershowitz, another very obvious lie.

I do. I have already posted it: "Ransome was another imperfect witness. In the fall of 2016, she had suggested to the New York Post that she had sex tapes of half a dozen prominent people, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump—but couldn’t provide the tapes when asked. (Ransome told me that she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein’s behavior, and to make him believe that she had “evidence that would come out if he harmed me.”)" https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/08/05/alan-dershowitz-devils-advocate This is a reporter from the New Yorker going on record that Sara Ransome admitted to him that she had invented claims about video evidence.. Do you not understand what this means? There is no video evidence. In your own link Ghislaine Maxwell said that she knows of no video evidence whatsoever. There is plenty of evidence that states that Epstein DID NOT film encounters, there is ZERO evidence to claim he did. Which is what you're doing.

Again, THERE ARE NO videos of any celebrities nailing Epstein's girls. These do not exist. This was a lie perpetuated by the liar Sarah Ransome. Ghislaine Maxwell has confirmed this. Ransome admitted it, before she again perpetuated the same lie. Now, the videos you then referred to were obviously the porn videos Epstein liked to watch. I have no desire to watch child porn and am a bit surprised you suggest anyone watch these or the government should release porn. Which will of course never happen.

The mendacity of xylophone in particular is breathtaking. I have repeatedly brought clear evidence to this attention that the Katie Johnson hoax was a hoax, and provided clear evidence for this. Yet he persists in repeating lies from an affidavit that was withdrawn and a case that was withdrawn because it was a tissue of lies. Again and again. The worst case of misinformation on AN I have ever seen.

You're a bit clueless, when they say "videos of Epstein" they don't mean Epstein is in the videos. They mean videos of his, that were on his hard drive. Like any normal man Epstein viewed porn. Very obviously Bondi can't release porn to the public, I mean the government is not Pornhub.

Lol, obviously they meant porn that Epstein had on his hard drives. How can there be video of "Epstein with child porn"? Engage your brain. From your own article: The Associated Press spoke with lawyers and law enforcement officials in criminal cases of Epstein and socialite former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell who said they hadn't seen and didn't know of a trove of recordings like what Bondi described. Indictments and detention memos do not reference the existence of videos of Epstein with children, and neither was charged with possession of child sex abuse material even though that offense would have been much easier to prove than the sex trafficking counts they faced. https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/epstein-files-pam-bondi-claims-new-video/6321968/ So clearly what they found was Epstein's porn stash. You want them to release child porn? Guess why that won't happen. I know it's hard, but you can probably guess it.

You do know that the whole "Epstein filmed his girls' encounters with celebrities" accusation was made by another habitual liar, Sara Ransome who made up stories to profit from the Epstein compensation fund? She made the allegation that Epstein filmed the encounters, but later admitted in her own book that she made the claim up. Then later reversed her stance again. She's a total liar. Ransome was another imperfect witness. In the fall of 2016, she had suggested to the New York Post that she had sex tapes of half a dozen prominent people, including Bill Clinton and Donald Trump—but couldn’t provide the tapes when asked. (Ransome told me that she had invented the tapes to draw attention to Epstein’s behavior, and to make him believe that she had “evidence that would come out if he harmed me.”) https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/08/05/alan-dershowitz-devils-advocate There are no tapes. Epstein never filmed anything.

Why is there a minute missing that was stolen by aliens?

Well, given that truckloads of evidence from Epstein's black book of contacts, to the FBI investigation files to court case materials have all been made publicly available and there is nothing that causes any concern whatsoever, what is rather staggering is that you seem so intent on there being "something" based on...well...no evidence at all. Seems staggeringly naive, I would say. Again, sensible people go on actual evidence. If you want to peddle lies and misinformation, speculation and fantasy, go for it. But don't expect anyone to believe you.

I've read books on the Epstein case, and followed it ever since it first broke. I read afidavitst, FBI files and researched all the main newspapers on information about the case. I don't need to rely on Fox, and never do. However, if they don't mention the Epstein matter anymore, probably for the simple reason that the game is plaaaaayyyyeeed,.,,,soooooo plaaaaaayyyyyeeed,,,,

Except Russia could never lose this war of course. It's simply impossible. Leaving aside that the Ukraine's economy is even smaller than Russia's, that it has even less manpower than Russia, if, unlike the actual situation now, Ukraine were to ever start winning conventional warfare the Russians would simply deploy a tactical nuclear weapon on Ukraine, which is not a NATO member. So no matter what happens, Russia is guaranteed to win this war. Which is why the limited demand for Donbass was so reaosnable. No doubt on account of the great affection Putin has for Trump.

Lol, you lot are the trolls, posting utterly fabricated lies. Shameless.

Oh you know about other "real evidence"? Do post the link. Lol.

Yes, here: https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein Before you keep clamoring "release the files" at least read what's already publicly available..lol...

He can't. It's all lies. I looked into it. They actually fabricated a lawsuit! Lol: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-do-papers-allege-trump-epstein-took-part-sexual-assault-1857863

Yes, I know you'd prefer to rely on the "affidavit" from the tissue of lie case, aka Tiffany Doe. Sadly, that case was dismissed. I only go on real evidence. The lies and fantasy are all spouted by your camp. You lot should be wearing the pointy hats.

Everything publicly available. Knock yourself out: https://vault.fbi.gov/jeffrey-epstein

We have two witnesses now. Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell. They have BOTH said, in the clearest possible terms, that Trump never had sex with any of the Epstein girls. And if it had happened, certainly Ghislaine his main girl, and Virginia Giuffre, his second girl, would have known about it. Both were involved in recruiting the girls for Epstein and both initiated the girls into what had to be done. So if that had happened with Trump they would certainly know about it. Unfortuantely we can only go on evidence, not fantasy. Or even worse, as Xylophone was doing, made -up fabricated malicious lawsuits initiated by fraudsters that were shown to be a tissue of lies, meaning the Tiffany Doe pile of lies. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-do-papers-allege-trump-epstein-took-part-sexual-assault-1857863

‘He didn’t partake in any’ of — any sex with any of us https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/09/epstein-mar-a-lago-trump-1456221 Do you speak English at all? Do you not know what the words "with any of us"...mean? She was not saying he didn't have sex with her, but she never saw him having sex with any of the Epstein girls she helped recruit and groom. And don't tell me to do anything, much less research, when you're too thick to understand basic English, I've done more research than you. Get a life instead of peddling demonstrably false lies on the internet. Pathetic.

No there isn't, stop lying. The main accuser Virginia Giuffre has specifically said that Trump never had sex with anyone. “’Donald Trump was also a good friend of Jeffrey’s.’ That part is true. ‘He didn’t partake in any’ of — any sex with any of us but he flirted with me.’ It’s true that he didn’t partake in any sex with us, but it’s not true that he flirted with me. Donald Trump never flirted with me,” Giuffre clarified later. https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/09/epstein-mar-a-lago-trump-1456221