Cameroni

Maybe that was at the end then? I closed it after some time, as I found her dishonest, manipulative and overly dramatic. What the point of pointing out the 100 year old protester was, I have no idea, apart from obviously agitating against Trump.. As I recall the sweet 100 year old lady was arguing for scientific funding ("Girls just want to have fun-ding for scientific research" harhar"). Anyway, that clip was a dog's breakfast and convinced me that watching the Rachel Maddow show is a colossal waste of time, won't be tuning in again. Worthless. She's basically a parasite living off of Trump. Like those tiny fish who attach to sharks. Or like those Youtubers who posted about the Depp-Heard trial, only her trial is all year round. She must make a fortune from being a guppy fish.

Not sure why people do it online when they can get an agent to do for them online.

Exactly. And his lifestyle. If all those boxes are ticked 8000 should do it. Though depends on the girl, does she have relatives to support plural, or just one, do they have debts and issues...?

I'm not even anti-Trump and even I got scared as Rachel Maddow was describing the utter evil that is Donald Trump. It was like watching Goebbels, if Goebbels were a lesbian going down on 67 year olds.

Well, apart from the visual horror of Maddow going down on her 67 year old lesbian wife, the real issue is much more serious. Do you think that the fact that Rachel Maddow is a raving lesbian deviant who prays at the altar of Sappho every night with her 67 year old "wife" does not have an influence on her reporting the news, and on Trump in particular? This will not colour and pervade her view of things? Obviously it does. Like I said, I watched a few minutes and Maddow came across as a zealot on an almost religious level, she was literally almost crying as she talked about Washington being occupied. Pausing for dramatic effect she spouted speculation after speculation, none of it corroborated with facts. Even wheeling out a 100 year old woman protester. She tried to appeal on the most base emotional level. Her sole aim was to agitate against Trump. This was not news. This was histrionic agitation dressed up as news. Lol, I SAW Maddow. The last thing she offers is "incisive, accurate and well researched" news. What she actually offers is histrionic, hysteric, speculation totally devoid of facts, that services the echo chamber YOU favour. If Maddow is "incisive" "accurate and "well researched" then Joe Biden was a great president, lol. Indeed Maddow is watched by many people, that's true, which is the perplexing thing. Perhaps not though, as she services the most base, hysteric and preposterous instincts of the large mass of losers who lost the last election.

I was actually watching a few minutes of Rachel Maddow. The truly weird thing is that they market Maddow as serious news you can trust. In reality she was almost crying talking about why Washington is really taken over, speculating and making it up as she went. There are cheap tabloids with more serious news than Rachel Maddow. The left wing media is not just disgusting it's actually very poor quality.

They're a lesbian couple! What do you think they get up to in the evening, play monopoly? Let me tell you, my perverted imagination is A LOT better than Rachel Maddow and her 67 year old muffin. Oh yeah, you watch an ice hockey player jawed lesbian who gets it on with a 67 year old blonde woman and I'm the weird one, ok.

The real miracle is a why are people watching Rachel Maddow, who goes home to do cunnilingus on her 67 year old wife, at all? It's obvious she's a hysterical deviant. Yet people watch her.

Yes, it is just NATO propaganda to suggest that Putin wants to establish an old historical empire. He wants nothing of the sort and has stated so repeatedly. The article you posted is excellent, as an analysis of history. It in no way implies Russia wants to re-establish any old empires or annex the Ukraine. Quite the opposite, from the very article you posted: We respect the Ukrainian language and traditions. We respect Ukrainians' desire to see their country free, safe and prosperous. Russia has never been and will never be ”anti-Ukraine“. And what Ukraine will be – it is up to its citizens to decide.

Absolutely not. Under Hitler women were allowed to vote and allowed to work. Hitler was too much of a feminist for me.

Too much?

He's obviously talking nonsense. "the NSDAP received more votes from women than from men in some areas before 1932 and throughout the Reich in 1932. In the 1931 September elections, 3 million women voted for NSDAP candidates, almost half of the total of 6.5 million votes cast for the NSDAP." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Nazi_Germany

Richard Evans is just another historian trying to make a name for himself by being a revisionist and claiming the opposite of accepted fact. The fact remains that almost 50% of Hitler's vote was female. Had Hitler not received these female votes he would never have been elected. "In regards to the role played by women voters in Hitler's rise to power, Helen Boak notes that the "NSDAP had been gaining proportionately more support from women than from men from 1928 onwards. The larger increase in the share of women's votes than in that of men's votes cast for the NSDAP from 1928 owes much to the party's growing prominence and respectability, as the party's dynamism, the contrast of its young leadership with the elder statesmen of the other parties, its growing strength, the disintegration of the liberal and local, conservative parties and the general disillusionment and dissatisfaction with what the [Weimar] Republic had brought or failed to bring all contributed to the reasons why German men and women turned to the NSDAP...Because of the preponderance of women in the electorate, the NSDAP received more votes from women than from men in some areas before 1932 and throughout the Reich in 1932. In the 1931 September elections, 3 million women voted for NSDAP candidates, almost half of the total of 6.5 million votes cast for the NSDAP." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Nazi_Germany

And I agree with you here, this is correct. This is of course embarassing NATO propaganda. Putin's statements say the opposite.

Lol, this must be the world's first dictatorship where the mainstream media is agitating against the dictator day in day out. And the world's first dictatorship where the judiciary decides against the dictator day in day out. Not dictatorship as we know it, I'm afraid.

Not this again, it's been done to death. False NATO promises not to expand, expansion, Ukraine jumping into Bed with the USA and EU.

It wasn't "unprovoked". It was tremendously provoked.

Yes, she does, maybe read that post again.

I don't think that's for Zelensky to decide anymore. Russia is in control of the Donbass. Unless Putin makes a generous offer, but I think that's unlikely after the way Zelesnky agitated.

Sure, why not: "It was the women's vote that propelled Hitler to power" said Herman Rauschning, a German socialist politician at the time. Half of Hitler's voters were from women. Had women not been allowed to vote Hitler would never have come to power. A full 50% of his votes came from women. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/241521?journalCode=jmh

Look, Ukraine got the Crimea from Russia in the first plac,e it's only right Russia is compensated.

Lol, so you were clamouring "release the files". And the judge says "Nah, the information was already out, no need". This is unbelievably funny. We are laughing.

I'm not saying women are "inferior", I actually don't think they are. Sure, you can argue about how the bell curve in IQ has more men at either extreme, and physical strength, but obviously the differences are smaller than the similarities. You can have exceptionally bright female partners in law firms, flying jets, and researching biogenetics. So it's not that women are inferior, they can do all these things, we just don't want them to do that, for policy reasons. Because once women are set up in a position of power, they favour women, their own. Why do you think women's news shows always have female experts? Women in law firms promote women partners. Angela Merkel put von der Leyen at the head of the EU. The thing is, these women are smart, highly intelligent and they have with the complicity of stupid men, managed to fashion family law, employment law, the employment market, the sexual market place, and even medical research and politics in their favour. Do you think Bonnie Blue cares if she's working at destroying the fabric of society? No, her net worth is 24 million Dollars, she makes 2 million dollars a month by opening her legs for gangbangs on Only Fans. Do you think she cares if it's just and right that she can make 24 million Dollars by fornicating? No she does not. Do you think the average divorcee cares if she gets half the assets and alimony of the man she divorced, or whether it's just and fair? No. Do you think female commentators care if they got ther football or NBA gig because they're women? No they don't care if it's just. They just want to take advantage of the system, which feminists and weak men have allowed to be put in place. It is a matter of policy, of survival of society as we know it, do we want women in charge or not? And you need to think carefully if you say yes, because they will fashion society in their favour. Just look at Scandinavia. There will be almost no children born. Not enough to replenish the workforce and taxpayers anyway. Our economies and social services will die. Marriage is already dying. If the vote for women were removed, then women would stay at home, all these things could be reversed. Now of course democracy was never meant for populations of 5 billion people, it was for small tribal groups and small populations where only men and property owners who were well informed would vote. Now, we have a partisan mosaic of interest groups, old people, women, blacks, hispanics, jews, young voters, women, men, and each group is trying to take advantage of the other. Here, after the vote for women is removed, the solution is to amplify the voting power of property owners. And yes, increase the voting age by all means. But something has to be done, because our societies are in obvious decline and the falling birth rate means our economies will die, and services will disappear. When women take power, they will oversee a wasteland. It is our responsibility to save them and us.

That's just it, isn't it. I mean imagine if from an early age you would not waste all your energy to prepare for a career to make money, but instead practiced yoga, meditation, weight training, cardio. And in addition if you were fully aware of the actual truth about nutrition, and consumed a low-calorific diet? From the start. Hydro therapy, regular sex, full social life with close friends, a dog, and all this since day one. Perhaps you could add 30 years. But 900? Consciousness transfer into a computer? Do me a favour. That's just nonsense. Sure, you can have an artificial heart, artificial limbs, artificial circulation, but I think this article is getting carried away.

He does come across as a bit of a puppet and a muppet. But that is a real video, not AI. I could not believe my eyes that someone like this actually leads a country. What times we live in.