Cameroni

Those in the know disagree: https://www.technewsworld.com/story/lenovos-thinkpad-x1-carbon-has-me-rethinking-my-macbook-pro-179565.html

Personally, by far the best lawyers I've met were men, and the best doctors I encountered were men. However, this is purely anecdotal evidence. If we look at the figures and see that 64% of new solicitiors are women this shows that women are outperforming men at law school. Law school is equally hard for everybody, men or women. Women are making steady progress in law and in medicine too. As the numbers are now, the majority of lawyers and doctors will be women in 10 years time.This will mean that the law and medicine will be even more shaped to favour women. Because what all these female working lawyers and doctors have in common is that they are all feminists. We have seen with Me Too and now the Tea app, what the future for men could look like. And it's not great for women either, women online are complaining men are not approaching them anymore. But I think the key issue is that not enough children are being born to replenish the workforce and taxpayers, so the economies will die, social services will die. Unless drastic action somehow provides incentives for women not to become lawyers or doctors, but to have children instead. But women don't want to have children with men who do not improve their lives financially. So the more well off women are financially, the smaller their incentive to marry and have children becomes. Something needs to be done. We can't make social media apps disappear, but removing the vote for women would be something that could be done.

Another successful female politician.

Well, I'm assuming your'e choosing her, so she brings the 8 to 10 looks and is no older than 25. The reason I say only 8000 is because you DO NOT want the girl that's been dating a 45 year old accountant who was sending her 28000 a month. Because she's spoiled in more ways than one, but also financially. The girl who says she's worth 40,000, guess what....she's not. Here's why, there are many many thousands of 18 to 25 year old girls who make no more than 8000 baht in the most brutal work. This is the girl you want, or even better one who's not working at all. For she is not spoiled, and for her 8000 is a lot, she'll appreciate it. You shouldn't lead with the wallet, so if you pay out 40,000 because you can, you're getting a whore who'll jump ship when some guy pays 500000. If she's with y ou, she should be with you at least in part for your lifestyle and for you. If money is the most important to her, just ditch her and get a decent girl. She's for the streets.

Month of course. Though to be paid weekly, so she doesn't squander it all at once on her mother or sister.

8000. Absolute tops. Even if she does modelling competitions.

Perhaps you'll find JD Vance will be even more right wing than Trump ever was. Just sayin'.

Nah, it was just her clickbait. She got me good. She claimed she knew the "real reasons" why Trump was sending military to Washington. Of course when I started the video it started with an endless diatribe about Trump, how he's not hard on crime. I was totally shocked. This was not what I was promised! This was not hard news! Just cheap anti-Trump agit-pod. I fast-forwarded...surely...at some point...she'll talk about the real reasons she put in the video title...some actual information....but no....There was nothing....Just more speculation, insinuation and hysterical hand-wringing.. But it was a bit like being slappled with the stick of stupid, you're not wrong. I never should have clicked on it. You live and learn.

That's absolutely true of course, there is no denying that it was 14 year old girls who made Elvis a superstar. And clearly his exotic looks and sexually suggestive movements were a big part of that. There were a number of coincidences that came together that made Elvis. That he walked into Sun studios for a start. That the receptionist remembered him. That records started to become mass media, radio and tv emerged. However, I admire Elvis for sticking to his craft. He was incredibly productive all his life. He died at 42 but achieved more than most people in 5 lifetimes. I collected Elvis albums from 10 years old, had almost all the RCAs many Camdens, special concert prints, and to this day I put on Elvis albums where I don't even know the song. He recorded so much it's unreal. I saw his films as a kid, so I loved Kid Galahad. Others were pretty bad, Kissing Cousins and such. But love him or hate him, he was true to his craft and incredibly productive. When I hear heavy metal screeching singers, it reminds me of hysterical women, the long hair and tight trousers don't help. I also found people who love heavy metal to usually be the kids that were picked on, the dweebs and goody-two shoes. Never liked heavy metal or the try-hard 70s voices.

Well, the winners wirte history. It's always been thus. Trump is the winner. The left are the losers.

Yah, I think Mercury had a very distinctive voice, and very high energy and intense. So that's why you can only take Mercury in small doses. Elvis however seems actually more of a middle of the road singer, inbetween the screaming intensity of hard rock but not as tedious as pure easy listening. As a result you can listen to Elvis almost ad infinitum, for all eternity almost, because he also varies his repertoire greatly. He can do soft and sweet and close to hard rock intensity even. That's why I almost see Elvis as the ideal. Whereas the hardrock and voices of the 70s are a bit too try-hard.

One has to admire the attention to detail of Preisdent Trump. No loose ends are left untied. Excellent point. A bit trite for the left to complain of history re-writes when they've spent decades doing just that. Including tearing down art.

How is doom a risk? The Netflix scenario some have painted is that AI models will themselves want control, will create their own models.However, does this not require conciousness? How can an AI model be conscious of itself?

Errrr, no. Kaliningrad, formerly Koenigsberg, rightfully belonged to Germany,.

Well, I love the confidence.

Are you in all seriousness suggesting Sweden is the greatest country in the world?

Wow. Just. Wow.

Swissie gets it.

I'm an Asus Fan too, but Lenovo are worth a look. Their Thinkbook is acclaimed as the best business laptop.

No worries.

That was not my writing, do not attribute to me.

I wish you were right. Sadly, if you look at the figures in the law for instance in the UK: "Women accounted for just over 52% of practising solicitors, with the gender gap was much bigger at student and entry level. Women made up two-thirds of law graduates and 64% of newly qualified solicitors." https://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/nearly-two-thirds-of-new-solicitors-are-women-as-gender-gap-widens So with two-thirds of law graduates now being women and 64% of newly qualified solicitors being women, it is just a question of time before they will take over the legal profession. They have progressed. And this is reflected in very senior female lawyers having worked and lobbied for criminal laws more favourable to women, employment laws more favourable to women, family laws more favourable to women. We see the same trend in medicine btw: https://www.gmc-uk.org/news/news-archive/more-female-than-male-doctors-for-first-time-ever-in-the-uk There too women will take over. And we already have medical research disproportionately geared towards women's health, not men's health. Whether or not the new female partners in law firms, and new doctors, will be as good as the male doctors were, that's another question, but there can be no doubt that the feminists have started to fashion society in their favour. That's why I think rigorous anti-feminist action would be required to restore the more desirable, from our perspective, ascendancy of men. The vote for women is relatively recent and clearly things have not got better with women having the vote. From electing Adolf Hitler to providing some of the worst politicians we've ever seen, women have not greatly improved society. The opposite is the case, bar a few exceptions. I would completely agree with increasing the voting age. I also think additional voting weight for owners of property and parents of children would be justifiable. As it is the system will go to hell, there is no doubt about it. Not enough children being born to replenish the workforce, the taxpayers keeping all systems alive. Economies and the state will die, unless women go back home and have children. For that they need to have a reason, ie a man has to be able to make their life better financially than they are able to fashion it.

Great artwork, can one buy the print anywhere?

Not with more discerning minds, like the one addressing you now.

Of course Trump is not a dictator. The OP is making a rather amateurish atempt at agitation. If he had been familiar with Carl Schmitt's definition of "dicatorship" he would know that as regards a sovereign dictatorship it would involve the dictator not being bound by the existing constitution at all and seeking to overthrow it and establish a new one. The sovereign dictator would then be seen as the embodiment of the constituent power, capable of creating a new legal order from scratch. This is so far removed from the actual situation in the US with Trump that it's not even worth entertaining this notion seriously.