Cameroni

Provided the girl is in the desirable age, good looking, not mentally ill, fat or has some other affliction that drastically lowers here sexual market value, then you will always pay. Always. The only exception is older women, ugly and fat women, the mentally ill, in other words, women who have an extremely low sexual market value and have to resort to male sexual strategies like providing resources. It happens but is quite rare. Johnny Depp and Amber Heard had a genuine relationship, but he still had to pay. Elvis and Priscilla had a genuine relationship, Elvis still had to pay. Sinatra and Ava Gardner had a genuine relationship, yet he still had to pay. This is how the world has worked from the beginning of time, women provide sexual access in exchange for resources. And as Casandra Ventura made clear in the court case du jour, it is still the case today. Anyone who claims they don't pay is either a liar or just an idiot, usually the former.

It's hilarious, isn't it? Elvis Presley, Frank Sinatra, Johnny Depp...they ALL had to pay for their girlfriends and wives. And they were the most desired celebrities, fame and good looks. But when this topic comes up on Aseannow there's always one or two jumped up clowns who claim they don't pay. So Elvis, Sinatra and Depp had to pay....but you don't? Lol. Hilarious.

Another one. Lol. Do you believe your own bs? Cause I know I don't. i never said being good looking and the ability to earn a good living are mutually exclusive. I said that if a woman is paying for you, then only because she has low sexual market value. If she is good looking, you will pay for her, whether she makes a good living or not. Always assuming you are in a long term relationship and not a two or three meet Fbuddy. I'm the ugly one? I'm better looking than you will ever be. I'm as pretty as it gets. But I still have to pay. Like you. And that other charlatan. Because that's what men always have to do. So stop lying. Nobody believes your bs.

Lol, spare me your bs about "game". You are clueless. Game is only to get into a relationship. If you just know "game" you are just incapable of retaining any girl long term. "Game" is only the entry ticket, once you are in, you are paying. Whether you like it or not,. Unless you date only ugly women, women over a certain age or who have mental issues, ie women with very low SMV, those may pay half their share, or even all of yours. But for the vast majority and normal relationships, where good looking women are involved, the guy will pay, one way or the other. It has always been this way, for thousands of years. But of course you're special and you don't pay for girls. Lol;. Pull the other one. Even if she likes you, that just means you get in. For a long term relationship, you will pay. Stop lying. You don't pay, lol. Sure you do. Like everyone else. You pay.

In your dreams. You're just another fake charlatan who claims he doesn't pay for his girls. You're lying, and we all know it. Girls "on your phone", shows you're not even getting what the subject matter is, we're talking about real relationships. Not a girl you met two or three times.

You don't "buy" a girlfriend obviously, she's not yours. But her liabilities are yours, so if she needs money for family, for her medical treatment, for food, shelter, etc, then you have to pay for it. They do, but women who have money stilll will seek a partner who improves their lives financially, they will date up. It is very rare they will do what men do and take on a liability. If they pay for dinner, they are investing in a relationship with you, because they know your resources are substantially greater than hers. No, that's not how the world works, and I doubt that's how your relationship works, your gf paying exactly half of your expenses. Unless she's ugly as sin, and is trying to keep you with a male strategy of resource provision because her looks are that bad. But generally speaking, with better looking girls, a man will pay for her as a general rule. Women grant sexual access in exchange for resources. This is how the world works and has always worked since time immemorial.

So that would not make the USD/THB the "paradox" but the GBP/THB etc would be the paradox. However, this mystery is also easily solved, since comparatively the UK is in a considerably worse economic shape than most would have expected the UK to be in, whereas Thailand is still doing relatively well. After all Thailand's GDP growth rate is 1.9% and the UK's is 0.3 %. So Thailand is performing substantially better economically.

That's irrelevant, he;'s not buying a used scooter, he's talking about paying money for a girlfriend. If the girl were a true girlfriend, then money would be no object, as she'd deliver a whole lot more than sex, such as emotional support, household services and much else besides. If she were a true girlfriend, he'd have to support the family, pay for her if she got very sick to ensure she survives. She would be his walking liability but he would take it on regardless because of the benefits she offers. However, in this case she is obviously trying to take financial advantage of the OP. So one can discount the notion that she is a true girlfriend, she is the classic gold digger. Not true, Chuando Tan is fighting off the 20 year olds with a stick, depends what the man looks like and what his resources and social standing are. Also not true, even with money, you will find that women are highly selective with long term relationships, you would still have to offer a certain level of attractiveness for some girls. Others yes, they will do a hairy obese 280 kilo walking manpig. But not all gold diggerts are so devoid of standards, the better looking a woman is generally the more likely looks will also play some role, you still can't look repulsive. Even if you wave 30000 baht around.

Kid Cudi was lied to by Cassie Ventura, who told him she was no longer Sean Combs' girlfriend, when in fact that was not true. The verbatim transcript of his testimony: Steel: You told this honorable court and this jury, that she played you? Mescudi: Yes. Steel: She played you and you had no clue? Mescudi: No clue. https://mediatakeout.com/kid-cudi-speaks-full-testimony-transcript/ So Ventura saw two men at the same time and told both she was not with any other man, and only loyal to him.

It is only a "paradox" if you do not understand that the performance of the almighty dollar affects the exchange rate of all other currencies. Once you understand it, it will all make sense. Dollar weak, Baht goes up. Very logical.

This is bizarre. So he had to wait too long for his water and decides to empty it into a cooking pot? As revenge? As far as unpleasantness goes it is real yet tame. Even hooliganism is nicer in Thailand.

Normally yes, but this girl is special and different. The intimacy is amazing too. Did I mention she is amazing? She will stay the course, she does not even care about the money. She brought it up gently and does not push for it. She has not asked for anything else either. Only the 30000 Baht. She is very different. And definitely not using the OP. At all. Because she is special. And amazing.

Because you give her 30,000 Baht allowance every month?

Ah yes, you're being played. Obviously. 30000 is way too high, 8 to 10K would be more reasonable. You don't get a sense of being used, because you've put her on a pedestal and she can do no wrong now. If she cut your hands off, you'd say you didn't really feel a thing and she was just tring to help you save money on gloves.

Yes, obviously not a very tailored reccomendation. Though it should be noted that after the present correction many people do see Gold continuing an upward trayectory. But this is the beauty of the markets, they can always surprise you, and I think you're right, it's good to bear in mind that Gold can go down as well, not just up.

Yup, 2011 to 2015 was a clear bear market for Gold. I think you're absolutely right, investors should be mindful that Gold can go down as well. I quite agree.

You do realise the S&P had a massive drop a few days ago and swiftly went back up to pre-tariff levels? Don't you get tired of crying Cassandra non-stop? Surely the S&P will recover as swiftly as it did recently. How are any wheels falling off anywhere?

Didn't you kick up the same fuss when the S&P corrected, only to find it back to the same level within days? Moody's going from AAA to AA1 does not seem like the end of the world.

I don't need to pay for those, perhaps you do.

I do, I go to shop in Tops in Central. i don't like to take advantage of poor Thai people offering things at below market value.

It's not just vegetables that are very cheap here. In the local market 5 baht for a chicken tender. 15 baht for a cone of ice cream at Mixue or Dairy Queen. 12 Baht for a Snap chocolate bar.33 baht for a pack of minced chicken. Even bread, if you buy a 46 baht French stick at Big C you pay 11 baht per roll. Eggs, 5 baht a piece. It's ludicrously cheap in Thailand. To see Westerners who get good salaries of 2000 Pounds or more or guaranteed pensions, complain about Thai vendors who live hand to mouth in non-airconditioned housing and have less than 50000 in the bank, just trying to survive, is just sickening. I actually feel uncomfortable things are so cheap, because someone is getting ripped off, and it;'s not the Westerners.

To be sure Roosh was persecuted, he was arrested on a flight and denied entry to some country, his social media was blocked. I never read his books so i can't opine, but he certainly came across as a very smart guy with original insights. It was a real shame to see him become a bearded Jesus freak, but given the circumstances understandable I suppose. I think the death of his sister must have pushed him over the edge, they were close. As for Assange and Travolta, look no further than Sean Combs, whose girlfriend of 11 years extorted him for 20 million and is now taking great pains to detail every last of his intimate sexual preferences in order to take him down. It is impossible to overstate how careful you have to be with women. Their deviousness and scheming is off the charts.It is their default mode of operation. As was evident in this Survivor series, where they won, despite a clear inability to survive. Quite unbelievable.

Yes, I did. I would often sit down and think up new ways to organize the books. I had them put in storage like all my belongings before I came to Thailand. I used a thematic system. For instance all the Psychology and Psychoanalysis books together, history together, philosophy, literature, social anthropoogy, music, explorer literature, dictionaries, erotic literature, and so on. Within those categories I would then use a national system, so English history, Spanish history, American history and so on, German philosophy, French philosophy, Indian philosophy, Japanese philosophy etc. Within those sometimes there would be further sub categories, for instance in English literature I would group poetry separately from novels. At one point I got an app that could scan books and thus database them, but it was too much work, I could not keep it up. Too many books. They are still sitting in boxes in a garage in the homeland now. Like you I also would have preferred hardwood cases. But given the number of bookcases I needed and due to the fact I wanted some with doors, in the end I chose the Ikea book cases with doors. They look like wood. I was never that happy with them though, as that Ikea look is too cheap for a proper library. But they did the job and it was a cost decision in the end. From your questions I gather you are a fellow bibliophile?

Even the Dalai Lama gave permission to kill pests and insects. So no issue there.

Oh my God they are the main issue here. I was watching a Youtube channel of some British guy who almost had a mental breakdown because of ant invasion in his house. I almost went the same way.