Cameroni

That was seriously funny, thanks for sharing that story. If you seriously think an entire school class of 13 year olds is engaging in anal sex covertly, though, maybe you need to dial back on the porn a bit, lol.

If you don't like that university, fine, a 2014 study2 of CDC data from 2006 to 2010 found almost identical figures: Ages 30-34: Among women, 22% had 0-1 partner, 31% had had 2-4 partners, 25% had had 5-9 partners, and 22% had had 10+ partners. https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/the-ideal-number-of-sexual-partners-for-men-women#:~:text=A 2017 survey of 2%2C180,average of 8 sexual partners. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795598/ So again, about 20% women have more than 10 partners, 80% don't. Hyper-promiscuity is just not the norm. If you like hyper-promiscuous women, okay, up to you, but it really is not the norm, it's a bit odd. I don't have an obsession with "purity", not even a little, but when you choose a relationship it would be wise to choose carfefully and indications are that hyper promiscous women make poor partners. From her endorsement of Kamala Harris it would appear they also make poor political decisions.

I don't denigrate women at all. I'm saying those women who choose to have more than 10 sexual partners are a minority, and if Swift had 12 she doesn't make good decisions. It's not a likeable trait in a woman, sleeping around, but I'm not saying all women do that, 80 percent don't.

I don't think so, and I don't think your friend with over 100 sexual partners is typical. "Married men and women are remarkably similar in their levels of sexual activity before marriage, with 1 in 5 reporting only one lifetime sex partner (20% of men, 19% of women), about 1 in 3 reporting 2 to 4 sex partners (35% of men, 33% of women), about 1 in 4 reporting 5 to 9 sex partners (23% of men, 25% of women), and the remaining 1 in 5 reporting 10 or more sex partners (22% of men, and 23% of women)." https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-report-finds-link-between-strong-marriages-and-sexual-restraint-during-the-dating-years-301802184.html#:~:text=Married men and women are,%2C 25% of women)%2C So whilst there are women who do opt to have more than 10 partners, they are a very small minority, roughly 80% of men and women have less than 10 partners before marriage. Interestingly the same report also found: "Married men and women who have only had sex with their spouse have a nearly 45% chance of reporting a very high level of relationship stability in their marriage, compared to only 25% of married individuals with 5-9 lifetime sexual partners and only 14% of married individuals with 10 or more lifetime sexual partners. In analyzing the overall trendline, for every additional lifetime sexual partner reported, the probability of the individual being highly satisfied with their marriage decreased by almost 4%, the probability of their marriage being highly stable decreased by 6.5% and the probability of their marriage containing high levels of sexual satisfaction decreased by 4% in comparison to individuals who have only had sex with their spouse. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-report-finds-link-between-strong-marriages-and-sexual-restraint-during-the-dating-years-301802184.html#:~:text=Married men and women are,%2C 25% of women)%2C So yes, while there undoubtedly are women with 100, even 600 male sexual partners in the case of one Australian famously, the very vast majority of men and women, 80 percent do not go down this route. Indeed, the more sexual partners, the less relationship satisfaction and stability can be predicted. Maybe that's why Taylor Swift feels so bad about her own promiscuity, rather than moral concerns, she can feel her own dissatisfaction with her own life.

There is something such as innate morality. Taylor Swift regretting her own behaviour and saying that her promiscuous behaviour makes her feel bad, sad even, is clear evidence that embarking on such a path causes the woman herself great pain and regret. It is not a source of happiness for her clearly. And I very much doubt it is a source of happiness for Travis Kelce, to know that 12 previous men, probably more, have fornicated with his girlfriend.

That's laughable. Putin can't even occupy all of the Ukraine, much less Europe, Poland, Germany, Sweden etc. This is just hysteric misinformation. Russia's economy is smaller than Texas, it could never occupy Europe in its current state, indeed part of the reason why the USSR broke up was that it was unable to occupy all of Europe economically speaking. However, Russia does have over 5000 nuclear weapons. And if Harris supports Ukraine and causes Russia to use nuclear weapons we will all strongly regret Kamala Harris ever getting in the White House.

No, the fact that Swift herself can feel the wrongness of her own behaviour just confirms that it is indeed wrong. To have 12 exes, probably more, is not something any female aspires to, nor anything any man would deem desirable.

Yah, yah, yah, the tiredsome old every time you negotiate you're Neville Chamberlain, everyone we don't like is Hitler. But the fact is Kamala Harris' outright support for Ukraine could draw the US into a real war with Russia and thus unleash a nuclear war. How much better if Trump just withdraws the funding and ends the war, thereby making the whole world safe again.

Glamour just reported on Swift's interview with Ellen De Generes, so it's on video, Swift herself lamenting her own behaviour. ""This makes me feel so bad about myself. Every time I come up here you put a different dude up on the screen. It just makes me really question what I stand for as a human being. There's never been two guys on the screen two visits in a row. It's sad." https://www.glamour.com/story/do-you-think-you-have-too-many So Taylor Swift basically agrees with me, her promiscuous behaviour is sad and a real problem. It certainly makes her feel bad about herself.

The situation is somehwat different here, Putin has enough nuclear weapons to incinerate the US, UK and indeed the whole planet. Goading Russia into using nuclear weapons is the worst possible policy for the planet, Kamala Harris could kill us all.

Oh really? "Taylor Swift has been riddled with accusations of being promiscuous and ridiculed for her long list of ex-boyfriends." https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/us-celebrity-news/taylor-swift-shuts-down-slut-30988281 'It's shameful and sad that a hyper-promiscuous, childless woman (Taylor Swift), aging and alone with a cat, has become the heroine of a feminist age,' https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-12843445/Taylor-Swift-fan-shuts-troll-wholesome-story.html And of course it's an issue to Taylor Swift herself, witness what she said herself about her own promiscuity: ""This makes me feel so bad about myself. Every time I come up here you put a different dude up on the screen. It just makes me really question what I stand for as a human being. There's never been two guys on the screen two visits in a row. It's sad." https://www.glamour.com/story/do-you-think-you-have-too-many So, it's an issue to many people, including indeed Swift herself.

Unadulterated rubbish and complete and utter lies. Looks like you're confusing Biden with Trump.

Thank you so much. However, her 12 exes are a real issue. Me being a supposed "incel" is not.

Not at all, Kamala has made it very clear she will be a strong backer of Ukraine. The possibility that she will involve the US in a nuclear war with Russia is very real and a serious concern. Voting for Kamala Harris could be voting for the end of the world.

Nonsense. the British pioneered bombing civilians in the middle east in the 1920s. "Writing in 1921, Wing Commander J A Chamier suggested that the best way to demoralise local people was to concentrate bombing on the "most inaccessible village of the most prominent tribe which it is desired to punish. All available aircraft must be collected the attack with bombs and machine guns must be relentless and unremitting and carried on continuously by day and night, on houses, inhabitants, crops and cattle." "The Arab and Kurd now know", reported Squadron Leader Harris after several such raids, "what real bombing means within 45 minutes a full-sized village can be practically wiped out, and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured, by four or five machines which offer them no real target, no opportunity for glory as warriors, no effective means of escape." In his memoir of the crushing of the 1920 Iraqi uprising, Lieutenant-General Sir Aylmer L Haldane, quotes his own orders for the punishment of any Iraqi found in possession of weapons "with the utmost severity": "The village where he resides will be destroyed _ pressure will be brought on the inhabitants by cutting off water power the area being cleared of the necessaries of life". He added the warning: "Burning a village properly takes a long time, an hour or more according to size"." https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/apr/19/iraq.arts

I disagree. Business failures and bankruptcies are just par for the course in business, some ideas fail, others succeed. But those are business matters. To enter into relationships with 12 males shows Swift passed from man to man like a monkey swings from branch to branch. Such monkey branching is far more of a concern.

Why don't you go ahead and prove the premise that only that is true which is proven with evidence, using evidence, then?

"The belief that only that is true which is proven with evidence, is a belief that cannot be proven with evidence". Friedrich Nietzsche.

Every time anyone watches this clip you make her video more popular and make her more money.

Harris is doing worse in the polls now than before the endorsement. So looks like Swift's endorsement indeed turned people off rather than helping Harris.

The quote does not claim that the British practiced carpet bombing in the Middle East before 1937? I didn't realise you have problems reading, Brian. Lol.

Upper Silesia was of course another travesty, with the Treaty of Versailles calling for a plebiscite, then when the majority voted to remain in Germany rather than honour the plebiscite result instead Upper Silesia being carved up. Not on voting lines either, cities where the vast majority had voted for Germany (32 of 35 cities voted to be part of Germany) fell to Poland and so did 2/3 of industrial territory and 4//5 of natural resources. Not that Poland was able to do much with it in the 40 years that followed, but that was the reality. The British and French had supported this carving up of Germany purely for their own policy reasons, as they thought it would facilitate weakening Germany. In reality it faciliated Adolf Hitler. In particular the Upper Silesia plebiscite was a major grievance in Germany which led to the rise of the far right.

False. The British pioneered carpet bombing before 1937 in their colonies. Conventional raids, however, proved to be an effective deterrent. They brought Sheikh Mahmoud, the most persistent of Kurdish rebels, to heel, at little cost. Writing in 1921, Wing Commander J A Chamier suggested that the best way to demoralise local people was to concentrate bombing on the "most inaccessible village of the most prominent tribe which it is desired to punish. All available aircraft must be collected the attack with bombs and machine guns must be relentless and unremitting and carried on continuously by day and night, on houses, inhabitants, crops and cattle." "The Arab and Kurd now know", reported Squadron Leader Harris after several such raids, "what real bombing means within 45 minutes a full-sized village can be practically wiped out, and a third of its inhabitants killed or injured, by four or five machines which offer them no real target, no opportunity for glory as warriors, no effective means of escape." https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/apr/19/iraq.arts

No, a sensible negotiator with a lack of ideological blinkers. Everybody said Trump will push the nuclear button when he's president. Instead he diffused the North Korean situation skilfully, brought arabs and Israelis to the table. He used America's influence credibly and skilfully on the internationally stage. Harris, however, will unleash World War III with her rabid support for Ukraine.

If you read the post you know Harris supports mandatory buy-back of guns.