The Cyclist

How many times do we need to go around this house ? I am not saying that Pension is taxable in Thailand. I never have done, and never will do. Filing and taxing are 2 different things. Here is my view / current understanding ( Yet again ) Therefore

This will be comedy gold. Explain how the above is Over to you.

My bad, I didn't see that And yet again, Section 40, Part 1 of the RC, makes clear that Pensions are assessable. And this is the part that you are not getting. A DTA does not say that a particular pension escapes Thai Tax Law, rules and regulations. It says that it is only taxable in Country X, Y or Z. If you can show me a DTA that says different, I might listen If you can show me in the Revenue Code where as a ax resident I do not need to declare my Government Pension, by filing a tax return and having it exempt from tax by dint of a DTA, i might listen. Until then, I will go with my interpretation/ understanding, and my local Revenue Office can make a decision on whether it needs to be declared and filed on a tax return. Not some anonymous pixels on the internet.

How does " We " equate to being self centered ? Something else you didn't really think about before hitting the keyboard. Give it a rest.

Lefty code for Rapists, drug gangs, and other petty criminals.

For the brain dead that walk amongst us. Can I just point out that above is sarcasm. Based on reality

I dont think the original poster of that particular comment has been back to correct anything. And as you didn't make the comment, you are no position to correct anything.

Ahhhh Ok, got it Hi Gant, keep panicking.

What has that got to do with the price of cheese ? Why would I pay an agent when I can go to a Revenue Office, that I pass 3 days a week, file a tax return, pay no tax and get it for free ? You didn't really think that one through, before rattling the keyboard, did you ?

What other sh** was in that chicken Trump gave him, other than the chlorine ? Fatboy shouldn't have ate the seconds 😀😀

I have already told you. Your non-assessable does not interest me in the slightest. I will work with non- filable. Less than 60 / 120 / 220k Baht, or Pre 01 Jan 2024 Savings.

What is your issue ? What difference does it make if I have filed a tax return or not ? Does that make my interpretation of this omnishambles any less valid ? You will have to excuse me if I do not hang onto your definition/ description of non Assessable / Assessable income, which I think is wrong, as I have laid out in the post above. Yes, I know my pension is only taxable in the UK. As a Thai tax Resident, and it is over the filing levels of 60 / 120 / 220k Baht. Section 40 Part 1 of the Revenue code tells me it is assessable income, and I should file a tax return. You howling about " Where on the forms can you do this " is something that you will need to ask the RD. Somebody posted 2 days ago that they filed at a Revenue office, paid no tax and came away with a no tax to pay certificate. So it is clearly something that can be done at a Revenue Office, but not online. And as I remarked at the time of the posters comment. That certificate is something that we are going to need going forward.

Likely true ? Possibly, but I doubt it. This is my take based on the video of the Revenue guy and the post made yesterday by @Guavaman No need to file - Income below 60 / 120 / 220 k baht filing limit, or pre 01 Jan 2024 Savings ( Good paperwork required ) Assessable income, tax filing required - All incomes above the 60 / 120 / 220 k baht filing limit, which will then be split as 1. Exempt taxation due to a clause in a DTA, clause in the Revenue Code, or a specification of certain visas. 2. Subject to tax less TEDA's 3 Subject to tax less TEDA's and Tax credits. One of the 1st things to come out of the Revenue guys mouth was, the rules apply to everyone, Thai and foreign tax resident alike. So yes, we foreign tax residents have DTA's. Not one of those DTA's allow us to ignore, or give an amnesty to complying with Thai Tax Law.

I've never returned anything, and by the same token, never had a need to complain. What is the point of anything ? Comes down to personal preference, nothing more, nothing less.

Is that the best you can muster ? Weak, feeble and embarrassing.

Yep, that is a face that says " Where do I get me some of that stuff " 😀😀

Really ? What does this say, taken from the post by @Guavaman on the previous page Try getting your head around that concept. Non - Assessable is not a concept within the Thai Tax Code. Exempt, for the purpose of tax calculation is a concept within the Thai Tax Code. Likewise, so is the concept of Tax credits. So take your ' Duh ' and poke it.

My money is on frequent visits to a mental health establishment, from now until the next trial 😉😉

Deflection ? Eh, the topic is about the Southport attack and changing the Laws around terrorism, is it not ? Therefore, on behalf of all the sleeper terrorists and would be Jihadi's flocking undeterred across the Channel. I would just like to take this opportunity to thank Starmer, and the band of useful idiots, spouting hot air about changing laws, and not taking direct action to impede our travel across the Channel. Not much point in changing terrorism Laws, when sleeper terrorist and would be jihadi's are still coming across the Channel. Or are you one of those that mentalists that think that they are all Law abiding, genuine asylum seekers ?

Starmer stating, means Jack Changing Laws means jack When you have 40,000 fighting age males flocking across the Channel, who could not care less what Starmer states, or what Laws he puts in place. So until Starmer puts a plan in action to halt the Channel hoppers, he is doing nothing more than adding to Climate Change by spouting hot air. How is that you cannot understand that simple fact of life ?

What I support, or do not support regarding changing the Laws around terrorism mean nothing, when 40,000, mostly fighting age males are flocking across the Channel on an annual basis. Terrorists do not care what the Law says. So when Laws and actions are put in place to stop the boats bringing around 40,000 fighting age males across the Channel, I might start believing that something more than soundbites is happening. Until then, it is nothing more than hot air adding to Climate Change.

Hilarious The video is all over the internet, his words and action are crystal clear. There is nothing that anyone can say that would prejudice the proceedings.

Your valued input is appreciated.............. By somebody, somewhere, I just don't know who or where. I was merely pointing out that changing the laws or the definition of the Law, means the square root of nothing, when you have around 40,000, mostly fighting age males, of unknown backgrounds, flocking across the Channel. If you want to stamp out complacency, stopping that is your starter for 10. But that would be far beyond your level of intellect.

Better start making magic wands. Unemployment ticked up yesterday to 4.4%, and will continue to rise if Reeves does not reverse her budget raise of Employer NI contributions and reducing the NI threshold by nearly 50%.

According to Starmer Really ? How many years have lone wolf, mental health, stabby stabby, vehicle borne killers been wreaking havoc across mainland Europe ? Nothing new whatsoever. And while your assessment is probably close to the mark, in terms of monitoring, manpower and resources. It is meaningless whilst about 40,000 per annum are flocking across the Channel. And lets not forget the army of Human Rights Parasites that will go above and beyond the call of duty, to prevent anything that is ' Proactive '