-
Posts
9,853 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Georgealbert
-
Can I get a loan?
Georgealbert replied to AsparrownamedJack's topic in Jobs, Economy, Banking, Business, Investments
Do you have the chanote/land documents or are they deposited with the ‘government loan’? Without them the Kai Fak loan arrangement does not even seem an option. I think getting any formal loan seems very difficult, given your updated/full information disclosure. Please don't let pride over it being family land lead you into an informal/high interest loan, as you seem to already facing legal action and don't need further problems. Can only wish you luck. -
Redundancy Lawyers
Georgealbert replied to josephbloggs's topic in Jobs, Economy, Banking, Business, Investments
The chance to negotiate a better deal seems a good start, but if that fails I still think legal action would cost more in his time, money and effort than it may be worth in the end. Challenging a global company is never easy, but he should know the background on how the company operates and conduct their business and what sort of reputation they have. I know a few people who have been in similar situations and have been very stubborn in chasing a better deal, and in all but one case, the finally outcome was no better than the original offer, but in reality it was worse in wasted time, effort and cost. Wish him luck. -
Redundancy Lawyers
Georgealbert replied to josephbloggs's topic in Jobs, Economy, Banking, Business, Investments
He seemed to have pi##ed someone off along the way. I agree with FritsSikkink, seems the company is following labour laws. How long had he worked for them? “An employee terminated without a valid cause as stipulated by law is entitled to receive the following severance pay: 30 days’ wages where the employment period is at least 120 days but is less than one year. 90 days’ wages where the employment period is at least one year but is less than three years. 180 days’ wages where the employment period is at least three years but is less than six years. 240 days’ wages where the employment period is at least six years but is less than ten years. 300 days’ wages where the employment period is at least ten years but is less than twenty years. 400 days’ wages where the employment period is twenty years or more.” -
Redundancy Lawyers
Georgealbert replied to josephbloggs's topic in Jobs, Economy, Banking, Business, Investments
This maybe a starting point ,for your friend. Sounds more like the other 2 directors staged a take other, are they Thai? Seen that happen to a few people. If the friend has no large investment to lose, can’t see them getting a better offer, without encountering large legal fees, and then no guarantee. https://thailawyers.com/thai-laws/thai-labor-law/ Hard to believe a MD who could not find their own lawyer without asking a friend to seek help on an open forum. -
555555555 You so busy posting multi post on threads here everyday. Why post this comment, adds nothing to the thread. I think my favourites are all bias, based on the types of music I like. Yardbirds, Clapton, Beck, Page. Who, Townsend. Muddy Waters B B King Being tone deaf does not help.
-
Why would anyone want to risk it? With the tightening up of all visa/extension requirements, I think it is best to avoid any overstay. It just means planning and following the law. I have never overstayed and also accept responsibility for my life actions, seems some of the visitors of Thailand of not capable of that.
-
2023 confirmed as world's hottest year on record
Georgealbert replied to CharlieH's topic in World News
-
Donald Trump will not speak at New York fraud trial, says judge
Georgealbert replied to CharlieH's topic in World News
555555, so you got nothing, as expected. It is a hot day, don't get your neck sunburnt, any more. -
Donald Trump will not speak at New York fraud trial, says judge
Georgealbert replied to CharlieH's topic in World News
55555 So funny to be lectured by a Trump fan and then called ‘woke’ and told it is just me trying to deflect, when you post offered nothing to the thread. I stated facts, not some made up BS. Try reading the articles not just the headlines, or do you have the same attention span of your hero? It also shows a lack of intelligence and imagination to have to result to trying to use ‘woke’ claim. Maybe shows that you are too arrogant to see your own ignorance. Have a good day, I have fair better thinks to than read BS. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/01/10/trump-not-allowed-make-new-york-fraud-trial-closing-argument.html -
Donald Trump will not speak at New York fraud trial, says judge
Georgealbert replied to CharlieH's topic in World News
Trump is already trying to use it and has asked for the closing arguments to be delayed. Nice try at a bit of deflection. -
You really do try to make things as difficult for yourself as possible. Your posts show problems with hotels checking in/bookings and money transfers, wise, moneygram, western union and you were scammed. Try to keep life simple, if you not just really a troll.
-
Clever but Sloppy Tax Changes
Georgealbert replied to chai333's topic in Thai Visas, Residency, and Work Permits
Please have a look at this thread, for some facts. -
Do not think AXA has an age limit on travel insurance. Price seems to be based on where you want to go and duration of coverage. Have booked travel insurance with them a few times, all done onlne, but never had to make a claim. Try this link for a quote. https://direct.axa.co.th/TA/CoverageOptionPlan
-
Prince Andrew 'spent weeks' at Epstein home - witness
Georgealbert replied to CharlieH's topic in World News
‘A court, in determining whether the defendant is guilty of the offence charged may draw such inferences as appear proper from evidence of silence in certain circumstances.’ From this link. https://www.hse.gov.uk/enforce/enforcementguide/investigation/witness-inferences.htm This link is from the HSE, as in the UK, not only the police are trained and use The PACE Act 1984, which determines when and how a warning verbal caution is used. It will be up to the judge, magistrate or jury (depending on which court the case is heard) to determined what to make of a silent/no comment response. Section 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. The chances of silence/no comment helping the case is going to be rare, it will just make the officer doing the questioning work harder on the evidence. Some evidence will have already pointed to the offender, or the verbal caution is not required for a witness statement. Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 is only relevant to Uk. PACE Act 1984 is only relevant to England and Wales. -
Prince Andrew 'spent weeks' at Epstein home - witness
Georgealbert replied to CharlieH's topic in World News
It is only the King that cannot be arrested, and has sovereign immunity. Since 1967, that exemption has been written into more than 160 British laws to grant sweeping immunity to the monarch. All the other members of the Royal Family can be arrested, unless they are with him, the King. The laws also states that no arrests can be made in the monarch's presence, or within the surroundings of a royal palace. A royal palace is one that is used as a residence, such as Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace, regardless of whether the monarch is actually living there at the time. Arrest and questioning has to follow the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, and there is no exemption that Prince Andrew could use, other than stated above. -
Yes, he would make a perfect Dunning Kruger research candidate. I believe he is still trying to climb to point 1, and is never going to get there. He lacks the critical thinking and intellectual abilities to reach point 1, because his alternative reality, is the empty echo chamber, where only his opinion is right, and facts, the truth and others who do not agree are placed on ignore.