TedG

Pot meet kettle.

1) Yes, it says to make medicare advantage the default enrolment option. I don't see any issue with that. 2) There is nothing in the doc about raising the retirement age. Do you agree that the doc does not cut social security as you said in a previous post?

The dems can start with themselves.

There is always Finland.

The US does not need missiles in Ukraine.

It's an accurate reply to a post.

There was never an agreement of the sort. Russia did agree this in the 90's To achieve the aims of this Act, NATO and Russia will base their relations on a shared commitment to the following principles: development, on the basis of transparency, of a strong, stable, enduring and equal partnership and of cooperation to strengthen security and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area; acknowledgement of the vital role that democracy, political pluralism, the rule of law, and respect for human rights and civil liberties and the development of free market economies play in the development of common prosperity and comprehensive security; refraining from the threat or use of force against each other as well as against any other state, its sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence in any manner inconsistent with the United Nations Charter and with the Declaration of Principles Guiding Relations Between Participating States contained in the Helsinki Final Act; respect for sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states and their inherent right to choose the means to ensure their own security, the inviolability of borders and peoples' right of self-determination as enshrined in the Helsinki Final Act and other OSCE documents; mutual transparency in creating and implementing defence policy and military doctrines; prevention of conflicts and settlement of disputes by peaceful means in accordance with UN and OSCE principles; support, on a case-by-case basis, of peacekeeping operations carried out under the authority of the UN Security Council or the responsibility of the OSCE. https://www.nato.int/cps/su/natohq/official_texts_25468.htm

Finland and Sweden joined NATO.

There is no obfuscation here, you can't accept reality.

What are ‘official acts’ and why are they presumed immune? Return to menu The Supreme Court in a 1982 decision involving President Richard M. Nixon said that the Constitution shields presidents from private civil lawsuits for actions taken as part of their official duties — even those at the “outer perimeter” of their responsibilities. But the court in a 1997 case involving President Bill Clinton said presidents could be sued for private conduct. Examples of exclusive presidential powers listed in the Constitution include commanding the armed forces, appointing government officials and judges, pardoning defendants and engaging in diplomacy. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said the executive branch also has unchallengeable authority to decide which crimes to prosecute. “The President may discuss potential investigations and prosecutions with his Attorney General and other Justice Department officials to carry out his constitutional duty to ‘take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,’” Roberts said. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/07/02/official-act-trump-immunity-trial-judge/

This needs to crash and burn.

The Democrats are attempting to exert influence over the Supreme Court. They believe the Court should simply approve their unwise proposals.

@Jingthing Hit 8

@Jingthing hit 7

Hit 6

@Jingthing Hit 5

@Jingthing Hit 4

@Jingthing hit 3

hit 2

Hit one.

I think we should start with your lie about Social Security. I searched for Social Security, here are the hits.

Project 2025 does none of the above. You are lying.

The POTUS already has this power.

You don't support the war, but you excuse Putin's war on Ukraine.

There is so much Putin propaganda in this post.