Stiddle Mump

Great pics kwonitor. I will say, a couple of the images are similar to what I've seen under the microscope. Some look like drawings. You would think that knowing all about these images - especially the ebola one - they could gather together enough of them together to isolate, and show the scientific world what they have done. Not yet! And not likely to either.

Not only that Rattles. The pro-vaxxers have almost certainly had the clot shot. And probably more than one. Dr D Cahill reckons they will have serious effects with 5 years. There are things they could do to ease their suffering, when it does arrive, but they have to swallow some pride and be more humble. Or it's ???? Anyway! I don't like to see suffering so they know where to find me.

You obviously don't see things as he does. He has had many peer reviewed papers published though.

Best not to waste your time then Sir. The best pic I have of the viruses is the ludicrous varient of the original. That's Fred in the centre. And his girlfriend Mable is just behind getting stuck into some tasty cells. She's a real greedy pig.

You are wrong Sir. Electron microscopy cannot distinguish a virus from other cell debris. If you have a pic that can show as you say; please post it.

We have an electric vehicle. Don't dare go anywhere where it might need charging. 30 km round trips max.

Of course they should be stopped at once. They should never have got started. But covid, and the only cure, was like a giant snowball rolling down a mountain. i'm well aware of Dr McCullough. I applaud his action on the horrific killer jabs. He certainly has some pull among the alt science (truthers) group, But I don't agree with him on the one fundamental theory. And I'll say why. '''Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits.''' There are NO benefits to taking a covid jab. What's the point of any person taking this toxic filth into their body to cure, or lessen the effects of, or whatever, of something that does not exist? This is where the good Doc and me, part company. Basically; is it true, that viruses exist? Peter McCullough obviously thinks so. I say NO they don't. There are far simpler reasons why we get sick, and viruses are not on the list.

Best to take a small generator, and a few litres of fuel, on any trip where you might need to charge up.

Nothing I post, whether it is on this thread, or the cancer one I recently opened up, is false. The two threads are linked by the word 'cancer'. We need debate on this topic. I do know what I'm talking about Sir. There is no evidence that a virus called 'covid' ever existed. For that matter; any virus has existed. And if no virus ever existed; what's the point of vaxxes? Can't you see that it's all made up nonsense. As for the second group being awake, well some are certainly more awake than the sheep who simply believe, without question, what is coming out of someone's mouth because they are wearing a white coat or on the BBC/CNN. I've said it before, but it's worth saying again; most white-coats either don't know what they are talking about, or they have taken a few bob to shut up and do as requested. Or,,,,! Let's wait for Epstein;s client list shall we?

At the right time, that lake is beautiful, Before the whole area was carved up, and before Udon was developed: Nong Han was the major admin district. Stonking pics Chris.

I don't agree with you Sir. People in the second group (as you say) are generally awake to the nonsense, hoaxes and frauds in the scientific world. I can tell you now; no-one has died from covid. It never was dangerous, cause it don't exist. And IMO, not vaccinating yer kids, is a giant step forward for ensuring their future well-being. '',,,virus causing the next pandemic.'' Turn the television off Sir. Stop watching that endless propaganda. Dear me! Get with nature I say. It has all the answers we seek.

The way the body behaves is fundamentally to protect itself, and if compromised, to do what is the most efficient, and safe route, to get back to optimal heath. Fevers, sore-throat, bad belly, prolonged bouts of sneezing etc. They are all tools that our bodies use, to rid itself of undesirable entities. A tumor is the same. The body is sometimes unable to rid itself of a toxin, so to stop it running riot, it is captured, coated in protective substances, isolated it, tucked away, and removed gradually, if need be. Unfortunately; if the same toxin keeps breaching the defence system, the tumor will grow. It might even get its own blood supply. But again, that is to allow the body to eliminate it. The principle of the body doing what needs to be done, in order to protect itself, is with us all he time.

Let me progress. Can cancer be a good thing? Well, if you see the body as only interested in a couple of natural things, then yes, it definitely can. If you are a believer in conventional medicine; then no. The fundamental things that the body strives for are 'protection', 'survival' and 'reproduction'. Everything that happens inside us goes towards our well-being. It protects itself, so that it can survive to reproduce. The essence of nature. So where does cancer fit in? It's a toxic world out there. If the body is subjected to prolonged toxicity, or too much in one go, the defence/maintenance (immune?) system might become overwhelmed, and decide that it cannot eliminate the toxin through normal methods. So what does it do? it coats the entity, isolated it, and tucks it away. Maybe not out of harms way; but where it can do least harm. With a view to rid itself of the entity ASAP. Which it normally does. This method of protection is a way of the body limiting the danger of the toxic element. So I say yes. There are times when a tumor is used to protect the body itself.

There is a Samsung repair centre just south of Udon City.

Maybe not all; but are some a blessing in disguise? Let's discuss.

Can 'getting' cancer ever be a good thing? Not all; but are some a blessing in disguise?

You re bang on the money as usual GG. I'm not against balls though. We have all played with them at some time or the other. What I dislike more than anything is those men swinging on the hoop after they get a score. But, it's not just ball and hoop stuff. No! I don't like to see men doing synchro swimming. And as for ladies boxing; just forget it. I want ladies doing stuff that nature intended. Like having babies, cooking and needlework. If they must do sport then a competition where ladies clean a dirty oven could be good. Or putting washing on a line to dry. Not just speed, but artistic merit taken into account. We seem obsessed with numbers, measurements, time and balls. I'd like a return to nature. The sporting world needs a revamp.

Because GG is addressing the pressing issues of the day. Just who is interested in; man sees woman in sugar field who looks like his wife. Wife says it was not her. I think an award is appropriate. Bring back 'poster of the month'.

Anyone swinging on the hoops should be lebotinized. Only thing to compare with that despicable act is footballers jumping on each other after a goal. Actually GG, I'm in tough with The Don's team. If you have no objection, I'll put you in the frame for the 'Sport Commom Semse' post. And why we are on the sporting warpath; what about that ridiculous padding all over the body in American football. A load of Nancy Boys they are.

Good for you to highlight this GG. I personally think that American Basketball is a waste of space and for anyone who watches it; a waste of their time. There are three things that could be done immediately for it to be a decent sport. 1 - Make the net just one metre high. Help the height chllenged people. 2 - Make the net 10 metres high. That would stop all that dunking and ridiculous swinging on the hoop. 3 -Put strings across the pitch at 1.75 metres high. Put bells on them, Any player who runs into one, and rings the bell, get sent off into the sin bin.

Big bed too. Big enough for three. Great pics Chris.

Guess it was. Plenty of Nobel awards seen ridiculous to me. Not just in a dubious medical field, but across the board.

The theory behind all vaxxes, is that they promote a 'positive' response from the body. The 'positive' bit, is so that (theoretically) the body will adapt to what has just invaded it. And stop the thing, that is being vaxxed against, getting a foothold in the future. There is also the belief that the jab in question, can lessen/dampen the illness symptoms. If of course one already has them. Or likely to get them. The negative effects of the jabs range from a sore arm to death. Obviously not so well celebrated as the positive ones. The body sees the jabs as a violation of its defence, and takes appropriate steps (if it is able), to rid itself of the injected toxin. What does the body do with the toxic entities? Can they cause cancer? Questions for another time with those.

What's going on at Pride Park? Right down there with the other relegation clubs. 7 league losses on the spin. Bundled out of the FA Cup by a mid-table 3rd string club. Rooney was an unlucky manager for The Rams. They could't overcome that points deduction. Could they get him back?

Dear me!! Couldn't be more wrong if I'd tried. Cherries were well beaten on all accounts. Let's hope they don't lose sleep, or heart, over this result. After all, they were playing perhaps the best the in Europe. Cottagers winning at Toon? Forrest hitting 7. Wow! They don't call it the best league in the world for nowt. I like the English lower divisions too though. Another team hitting 7 was the Peacocks. My team, Orient, went down at home. Well played Garry Gunner.