Stiddle Mump

Can't help my name boss. Fortunately i can read.

Indeed! And I'll tell you why they are. Too many have been sipping from the gravy trail, and that is about to end,

Of course they don't. How can they? But they do cause suffering and maybe death. There is no such thing as disease. Illness & sickness, for sure; but not disease.

Might have done the same as my mate in Nong Khai, Gave the lady 500 baht to squirt it in the bin, just to get his ticket.

I did a wrong un earlier. Sorry boss. Wikipedia. If you want to learn about the Lesser Spotted Field Toad, Wikipedia is your place. But anything that 'could' be controversial gets quickly politicised. I used to update some Wiki pages, mostly on sport, especially football, swimming and triathlon, but other topics too. I updated the Richie Allen Show, because someone had stated something that I knew was not true, and within 10 minutes it was changed. I contacted Richie and he said 'Let it go' and 'don't bother'. This has happened a number of times. Now I can't be bothered with the platform. Although, as I say, for lesser things it is great. There is a huge number of people out there, some probably paid, to stop any semblance of the truth recorded on Wiki. George Galloway tried to find out who was rubbishing his Wiki page a few years back.

He is a well respected white-coat. He has had 100 books published. But whenever his research is mentioned, certain members want to rubbish him personally. And your post shows that its not just members. Talk about shooting the messenger.

Great topic Red. The dam wall is cracking. Kennedy is bringing 'truth' and 'transparency' more out in the open.

Read his paper. A couple of bits worth considering: The methodology. He did a control. The summary. He said that the control yielded the same result. The conclusion. That the control yielded the same result has to be considered in drawing any evaluation. And, ever since, it was this experiment that has become the gold standard way of finding a virus. Virologists don't bother with the control though. Wonder why?

Not sure what this actually means. Do you mean 'clanger'? There is CDC, FDA, etc. but the IRL? Hope Kennedy can put them straight.

Not the PCR again? RIP Kary.

Wow! Good job the Ruskies don't know where the factory is!

Overtecnologicicized. Same with my Lambo. They did a wrong-un when they stopped cars being able to start with a starting handle.

Post any old tripe to protect the vaxx; why don't you Sir. . It's all a con. Good to see some on here (AN) - who were originally unsure - did some research and now have doubts about the whole charade. and once awake they don'tgo back to sleep. It's a house of cards, built on quicksand. Can Kennedy bring it crashing? Fingers Xed.

I can remember him (The Don) saying. "People have to get their shots. This thing is going around."

I don't agree with you Sir. There are times it's advisable to wear a mask. I wore one myself many moons ago when visiting a wood yard. However you stated 'uninfected'** & 'infected' The context you put them it in is incorrect. And 'll explain why. Studies have shown, many by the US Military, that infection cannot be passed on, from one to another, in the way you suggest. Dr Vernon Coleman. Actually I know him, and have shared a platform with him; many moons ago. TV cameras there too. Well he resigned due to a difference of opinion with the GMB. He would not disclose a patient's personal info to the patient's employer. But whatever you Googled about Dr Coleman. You are simply shooting the messenger; as usual. Dr Coleman has dozens of studies about masks on his www. www.vernoncoleman.com ** What is an uninfected person? A person who is well? Or. A person that sees through all the nonsense? Or; both perhaps? No! Must be the former as an awakened person wouldn't catch something that don't exist.

Direct effects! PREP Act still active.

Is that why 1 in 33 US kids are autistic?

Try 'one of the biggest hoaxes of modern science'. There is no; ',,,successful aspect of it.' They are seen as the poisons by the body. Which they often are. They cause immense harm, suffering and deaths. And make a lot of people wealthy. Wealthier than what they already are. Just pure greed. When the dollar lining white-coat's pockets comes before health something is very wrong with the system. Hope Kennedy can sort things out, for the sake of the little children.

Do you not know about procedures Sir? There are certain steps in lab-work. Find the virus in some's mucus. Isolate the virus. Then show that it can cause what was claimed on the first place. The white-coat virologists, which is nothing but a fraud, don't even attempt that. For a couple of reasons. Another story, another time. Except, that after you vaccine a population against a pathogen, fatalities drop from 100 thousand per year to 10 per year. Not bad for a virus that has never been shown to cause anything. Untrue and simply nonsense. In fact I'll call that part of you post; monumental humbug. A walk in the Black Forest might work wonders for you Jack. Nature has the answers we seek.

Give the gal a break. she is 5 months preggers, has no dosh. Could spend the prime years in the monkey. She needs our empathy and help.

My opinion on viruses is this: Never, has a virus been isolated** and been shown to cause anything. Except fear. Show me a paper where it has, and I'll read it. And if no virus! What are vaxxes for? Dr Enders was a Nobel Prize winner; was he not. And didn't he show that it was the procedure that caused the breakdown of the petri dish soup. It's all in his paper. Why not read it. ** If an entity is not isolated, it cannot be shown to cause anything. Nature has the answers we seek.

Big Pharma money is King. For the present. Go Kennedy go!

Dr Vernon Coleman has listed many studies on mask wearing. www.vernoncoleman.com

You can assume what you like. That's OK. Early days yet Gamby. I'm here for the long haul. Trying to get AN members to open their minds. I'm confident in my ability to fight my corner on various, but related health issues. I'll list some below, and you can choose one and we can debate. #1 We have lost touch with nature. #2 There is no such thing as a pathogenic virus. #3 Illness is not infectious. #4 Diseases do not exist. #5 We, humans, do not have a 'immune system' but a defence system. #6 'Cancer' is the body protecting us. #7 'We are what we eat', and our food is not as nutritious as it should be, and once was. #8 Nature is only interested in two things; survival and reproduction. #9 Vaccines have never been 'safe' & 'effective' under any circumstances. #X Plumbing and waste disposal had more to do with eliminating illnesses than any vaccine. #11 Our bodies will self-heal given the tools. #12 The way to the body is through the mind. #13 #14 Vaccines are one of the biggest frauds of modern times. #15 Covid was a 'deep state' operation and was planned from 2017. #16 If you are sick; go seek out a medical expert. Don't forget a big bag to carry the pills back. I'll not mention 5G or EMFs generally being detrimental to human, and animal health, as that maybe considered slightly off topic. So! There yer go Gamby. There must be one or two that you don't agree with, and could highlight for debate. I'll open a new OP. Foot note: My dissertation at Uni was on running. Nature has the answers we seek.

OK. And I promise I'll not use Google or ask anyone. Let's start with Nature. We are Nature. Nature is us. The very earth that we live on gives us everything we need. Earth, wind and fire. The earth gives us food, The wind brings water and air. The sun is the fire. Everything, yes everything, we see or make comes from the earth. Nature is all. We humans have over the last 150/200 years gradually, lost the essential traits of what it means to be human. We appear to have dumped our spirituality. We have lost our reason for being on the earth. We have lost ourselves. Also, importantly we have lost the nutrition in our food, especially minerals, that were once there in abundance; A good deal of these losses were, IMO, due to enforced education. Some due to industrialisation/modernisation. And much due to the health industry being hi-jacked by Big Pharma and big money. A major turning point was the birth of the FED. Suddenly, real power was in the hands of money people. Industrialisation, the motor car, the need for oil and energy transformed the following years. And Public health was not to be left out. During this period 1900 - 1920, nature based health gave way to financed health systems. Of course there was not so much dosh to be made from nature, as there could be from selling drugs; often from the left overs of the oil and chemical industry. Medical schools, linked to hospitals, were being funded by the money people who really didn't care about health; but they did care about making money. During this decade, doctors, who were based in natural healing, were labeled quacks. And to this day the term is in common use. Also during this decade many more viruses were 'discovered' in humans. (The first was Popper's polio experiments in 1908), Suddenly there was a new kid on the block. The virus. Although a scary, invisible enemy had been about for decades. But, Popper nailed it by injecting a soup directly into monkey's brains. It gave the desired result and this method became the standard way to find a virus, for some 40+ years thereafter. <Snip> Forward to 1954, and Dr Enders experiments with measles. Popper's way of determining whether a virus was present in a sample died a death. There was a new proven method of isolating a virus. And quickly vaccines followed. More to follow. I'll leave it there for now, as it is a huge topic; in fact a book's worth. But I'll welcome any questions.