Stiddle Mump

The above simply is not true. Isolation, as is purification, is quite specific word. There is no isolation what-so-ever in the two above examples. The nearest any white-coat has come to isolating a virus was Dr Enders in 1954. If you read through the methodology section of his paper, you will see that the 'isolation' he speaks of is nothing of the sort. But that experiment led the way for virologists ever since in lab procedures to find viruses. Nature is everything. We are nature.

Any paper that points to that Sir? If that were so, the parents would show different characteristics from, say 70 years ago, til now. Interesting. I'll have a read up.

Oh no they have not. Porkies all around.

There is so much in the bible that we don't fully understand Sir. How many of us go through life claiming we know something without having ever given it any critical thought? Proverbs 18:3 says, ‘If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame’. Daniel Roytas set aside his ‘common knowledge’ to truly explore the premises and history surrounding contagion, and came out with a completely new outlook on the subject. Anyone interested in developing a richer understanding of this topic owes it to themselves to read this book.

Afraid so. I detect a touch of rudeness in your post Sir. Not to worry. Read Dr Roytas book and report back. Nature has the answers.

You are completely missing the point of the book Sir. You have googled 'can you catch a cold' and are simply copying and pasting. The book examines experiments to establish pathogenicity, or otherwise, down the decades. As has been posted earlier; over 20 such sturdies were done, and well documented I must add, by the US Navy. They are a matter of record. Read the book why don't you. ""An incredible, thorough exploration of history that will make you question everything you thought you knew about infectious diseases, health, and the human condition. This well-researched book, with over 1,000 references, provides valuable insights to help piece together the intricate puzzle of why we experience illness. A paradigm-shattering, must-read for those trying to determine the truth and acquire a healthier and happier life!""

You are backing a loser. I think you should quit this nonsense. Dr Roytas' book examines at least 20 US Navy medical experiments. They are a matter of record. Nature has all the answers.

Don't agree with you Sir. Are there any experiments that show the isolation of a virus, and show it can cause disease? If you do some research you might think differently.

Even if it is documented that the US Navy did the experiments?

Dr Roytas is not spreading nothing. The book is about the 100s of experiments that intended to show, or otherwise, that pathogen viruses exist and cause disease. Many of the experiments were done by the US Navy. You are creating confusion among the AN members. www.CanYouCatchaCold.com Nature has the answers.

So Sir; quoting from a best selling book that a Doctor has researched for 5 years and documented 200+ human transmission experiments is just waffle is it? ''The claim that colds and flu are contagious, may be one of the greatest ever blunders of medical science. Prepare to be shocked as this book brings to life the buried data that can no longer be ignored.'' None so blind as will not see.

There ya go again. You are backing a loser, and you know it. Big claims from you, but no evidence. My take; viruses might exist, but are undisguisable from decaying cell debris. They are inert and not pathogenic. You say they are; then produce the evidence. Why don't you! To quote a passage from Dr Roytas' book. ''The claim that colds and flu are contagious, may be one of the greatest ever blunders of medical science. Prepare to be shocked as this book brings to life the buried data that can no longer be ignored.'' Is he wrong? A man that has just published a best seller? www.CanYouCatchaCold.com and has documented over 200 research papers and experiments during the last 100+ years. We are nothing without nature.

You are not talking straight Sir. You have posted waffle and nonsense. Simply parroting MSM rubbish. Show where a virus exists firstly. Show then evidence that an illness can be passed from one to another. Can't rubbish nature with me and get away with it.

You are talking like a confused person. It is you that is making the claims that pathogenic germs /viruses exist. Where is there any evidence? 100s of years of research eh! Point me to a paper then. Of course germs are real. Who has said otherwise? Pathogenic germs are a new argument however. Show where they are capable of transferring illness from one to another causing the same illness. Stop the waffle. Stop the nonsense and point to a paper, anywhere, at any time that shows pathogens exist. In Dr Roytas' book he closely examines past studies, many by the US Navy Medical. Take a read Sir. Plenty of evidence is out there. By the way Sir your examples '',,,,Measles, HIV, Covid, Flu?'' are not caused by a virus, and the symptoms of them are not pathogenic. Nature has all the answers we seek.

I too have had access to electron microscopy. Although not in the last 30 years. Where is there a paper that shows, in humans, that a pathogen can be passed on from one person to another?

Never mind posting nonsense. Where is there a paper that shows a disease, caused by a virus, can be passed from one person to another?

Absolute anti-science nonsense. Where is there one paper that shows that? You are posting anti-nature stuff.

Viruses may exist as a form of cell and tissue debris. However, IMO, there is no such thing as a pathogenic virus. It may well be possible to transfer viruses from one person to another, but do they cause sickness? I say no! However; show me any experiments that show they do and I'll eat my words. Dr Roytas' book 'Can You Catch a Cold', researches over two hundred papers to get at the truth. This is analytical research looking at hard science. Not like your anti-science stance Sir. Made up nonsense from the white-coats. The evidence for there not being a pathogenic virus is there for all, and yourself, to see. None so blind as will not open their eyes. Observing nature would help you. I reckon the onus is on the person making the claim that pathogenic viruses exist, to present the evidence. Not see any yet. Love nature. Love yourself.

I'm here for three things really Sir. If you are not willing to take on board what I'm saying; well good for you. It's OK. Firstly; I'm encouraging people to do their own research. Plenty out there that tells a different story to the main line. www.CanYouCatchaCold.com Secondly; to help people. Even the vaxxed who have bad effects. You are forgiven. Thirdly; and perhaps most importantly. To love and appreciate ourselves as an integral part of nature. We are much a part of nature as a owl, flower or a storm. Without nature we are nothing. The white-coats would have us believe they can alter it, improve it and better it.

It's just a giant money spinner. Of course the money accumulated by Big Pharma trickles down through the regulatory authorities, the universities and to individual white-coats. They all support the vax programme. Been going on since the Rockefeller days over 100 years ago. Listened to a Dr Tenpenny interview last week. While she is fully supportive of Kennedy's work she emphasises that the politics are the progress stumbling block. Heads can roll - as they already have - but Big Pharma has political people in its back pocket. I'd like to see Dr Tenpenny on the advisory board. Along with Dr Kaufman. The US is one of the sickest- if not the sickest - countries in the world. The parents are so brainwashed they continually allow the white-coats to inject poison junk into their kids; 30+ times before many can even walk. It's sad. The US should be leading the way instead of falling over themselves to hurt the future generation. As for the white-coats; they should hang their heads in shame. Hopefully their walking-the-log days are to come. We are nature. Nature is us.

I think over 30 jabs are given before the toddlers are 18 months old. No vax is safe. No vax is effective. No vax is necessary. All simply anti-science. Dr Kary Mullis was right about the fraudulent Fauci. Spelt out by Kennedy and Mikovits in their books.

If you think giving 90 jabs to kids before teen years is good then you are smitten. Vaccines are not only anti-science, they are anti-nature.

Climate Change will be the reason for the big divide. The final, and deciding reason, why the west has to curtail the rest's ambitions. The UK and US leading the charge.

Let's here it for the humble pineapple. Agree with the IO. Very easy to grow.

Well, I love it here. Don't think there is a better place to be in the whole world. Beautiful nature. Beautiful people. Beautiful life.