pampal

I am a big fan of TPLINK products, but they are way overpriced in LOS. In China and HK they are at least 50 percent cheaper. So if anyone is taking a trip to these places, it might be worth it to buy there.

The if guards were to shot them, then again it would be Israel's fault for killing innocent people.

After all, it is really the murdered family's fault.

The mother and father are definitely to blame for not protecting their kids and also for putting them in harms way.

Child Protective Services should have taken the children away from these parents.

Supplying security is one of the parents priorities, oh well most parents anyway.

This story is very fishy. Israeli settlers are armed to the teeth and most if not all have served in the IDF.

How can anyone go into their homes and stab them to death?

Maybe the terrorists waited until they were asleep.

Then they should start posting guards

LOL, or may be killers should not be going inside people's home and stab them to death including all the kids. but of course its not their fault its Israel's fault for not having guards.

Then if guards were to shot them, then again it would be Israel's fault for killing innocent people.

Who said Israel is to blame?

Oh yeah, that's right, you did.

Why are you blaming Israel?

I never assigned blame to anyone in my posts. but you have.

So tell me, Why are you blaming Israel?

This story is very fishy. Israeli settlers are armed to the teeth and most if not all have served in the IDF.

How can anyone go into their homes and stab them to death?

Maybe the terrorists waited until they were asleep.

Then they should start posting guards

This story is very fishy. Israeli settlers are armed to the teeth and most if not all have served in the IDF.

How can anyone go into their homes and stab them to death?

^^^^^^^^

Actually in a really sticky situation I would rather have front and rear locking differentials

As far as the Pajero leaning, since I changed my tires and rims, it leans about the same as a sports car.

NO: 1 Very good if off road and you would rather have that, than VSC!!!!!! I dont think so.

No: 2. New tire's wheel's another cost's just to make it handle. The soggy/soft suspension is why it leans. Might feel better but it will still do it. + loss of guarantee, good game A.

Jesting aside. I dont know I'll leave it up to the cleaver peep's, Who will know, but with the set up on the Pajero can it handle VSC. If so why has It not been fitted. Even at an extra cost. Top of the range one with VSC would be the best selling MPV by far.... Even with the crappy HiFi set up.

Would definitely rather have locking difs off road, rather than VSC. VSC kicks in during cornering and slippage on road and is next to useless in mud, I am talking off road. If you can't handle your car on road and need a computer to do that for you, that's your choice.

You can read more about VSC here:

http://www.sonirodban.com/vehicle-stability-control-vsc.html

If the suspension was soggy/soft as you suggest, than it would sag severely when loaded with weight. It does not as I have loaded my PJS with 5 ppl and their gear. On the other hand the Fortuner sags heavily when loaded with half the weight that I put in my PJS. So you second argument is like your first, lacking in substance.

Oh and lastly, the tires that are supplied with the PJS are good dual use tire with a high profile. That is what causes some lean in the corners. But they are great for off roading. You can't have it both ways.

RIP

^^^^^^^^

Actually in a really sticky situation I would rather have front and rear locking differentials

As far as the Pajero leaning, since I changed my tires and rims, it leans about the same as a sports car.

Why the huge gap's . Answer it as a take up for the wheel's on bend's. And boy do they need it as they Pajero lean big time. Not questioning the center of gravity. But to my small mind, lean, less weight on the inside wheel's, less grip. In 08 the Fortuner you had was an early one crap brake's Ect, Ect. I agree with the comment's about the CR-V and there still rubbish.

The huge gaps are for clearance. As any proper multi purpose vehicle vehicle should have. Sadly the Pajero's competition don't offer the same amount of tire clearance and suffer from other short comings. The lack of tire clearance causes problems both off-road and when increasing tire and rim size. But again the Pajero's competition can't compete with the Pajero's off road legacy.

I have a padded SCOTT bike bag. Works great.

Merida is OK, but Trek also makes decent bikes in that price range.

On steep long(paved) straight downhills I have hit the mid 80's and have wanted to but never been able to go faster.

70000 Infected computers is a small number

Latest Mitsubishi Prices

When I go back LA for the yearly visit, I gorge on excellent Mexican Food and visit family and friends. After a couple of weeks I miss my life in Thailand and China. That's the way it is.

My ASUS motherboard has USB3 ports but not of my peripherals are USB3. So waiting for now.

Alot of cyclists pedaling thru Bkk stay in the Khao Sarn area. Lot's of cheap accomodations and they let store your bike for you overnight.

The steering wheel is on the wrong side for driving here.

Intersting first post

By the late 1970s, Iran Air was the fastest growing airline in the world and one of the most profitable. By 1976, Iran Air was ranked second only to Qantas, as the world’s safest airline, having been accident free for at least ten consecutive years. Although both airlines were accident free, Iran Air came second only because of fewer operational hours flown compared to Qantas. Prior to this ranking, a fatal accident occurred on 25 December 1952, in which 27 of the 29 passengers on board perished, when their Douglas DC-3 crashed on landing.

source

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air

The sanctions on Iran have caused the safety rankings of the airline to drop. Iran Air cannot buy parts for their jets and are forced to manufacture in Iran or buy dubious spares on the black market.

Iran doesn't have nukes and denies trying to make them,

So how could they say they will launch their nukes when they deny having or wanting to have that capability.

Interesting how people make up stuff  

Really? Iran does indeed deny its nuclear intent, but then  Iran just wants to spread peace, love and hugs too, right?.

So was this "stuff" made up? Here's just a few of the statements coming from Iran that show a consistent intent to attack.

1, May 2004, Iranian Defense Minister Ali Shamkhani told al-Jazeera television some Iranian generals favor pre-emptive strikes against U.S. and Israeli forces

2. By David Blair, Diplomatic Correspondent 12:01AM BST 18 Sep 2007  The Telegraph

Iran threatened to fire long-range missiles at American targets in the Middle East yesterday as the war of words between Teheran and the West continued to escalate.

A senior commander of the Revolutionary Guard, the largest component of the Islamic republic's armed forces, chose this moment to outline the capability of his country's ballistic missiles.

3, May 3, 2009 German NTV reported on the latest developments in the Iran-Israel tensions: "Destruction in 11 days". According to NTV, "Iran has made its first ever announcement of a concrete objective of the destruction of Israel". The German report was based upon an interview aired on Israeli television with the Iranian leader general chief of staff  Attalah Salihi.

4. ran threatens to attack U.S. interests around the world if provoked - By Bridget Johnson; The Hill - 08/22/10 11:26 AM ET

Iran unveiled an unmanned "ambassador of death" drone Sunday as a senior official warned that any "illogical move" by the U.S. against the Islamic Republic's nuclear program would bring attacks against U.S. interests worldwide.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad inaugurated the unmanned bomber that carries four cruise missiles and can fly up to 620 miles, saying, "The jet, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship."

5. Akbar Dareini, AP, Sept. 3. 2010:

TEHRAN, Iran - Iran's president Sunday called for U.S. leaders to be "buried" in response to what he says are American threats of military attack against Tehran's nuclear program.    Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is known for brash rhetoric in addressing the West, but in a speech Sunday he went a step further using a deeply offensive insult;.  "May the undertaker bury you, your table and your body, which has soiled the world," he said using language in Iran reserved for hated enemies.

My statement was in respect to Iran's consistent statements that it would attack. Ipso facto, that as soon as Iran gains a nuclear weapon arsenal, it will attack.

In your post you claim Iran intends to launch their NUKES. Please include any link you have that says as much. They said they will launch missiles, never have they said they will launch NUKES.

So if you have any links that support you statement. I would love to see it.

But until then, you are making it up.

The question then is, who to cheer for when one wildly unpleasant theocracy takes on another?

The dictatorship or the democracy? Not a difficult decision.

The last time Iran tried for Democracy and elected a democratic leader was 1953(Dr. Mossadegh).

You mean when he was caught fixing the election? That is not democracy.

Who was caught fixing the election?

The US who staged the coup to remove the democraticaly elected leader. And put the puppet Shah on back on the throne.

A major concern with nuclear weapons is who actually has the authority to launch them and the controls that are in place to prevent an accidental launch. Does anyone know what protocol the Iranians would use?

There is almost no strategic value for a country possessing a limited nuclear arsenal compared to their enemy unless the country uses their arsenal first, so not a very sophisticated protocol needed, just the belief of an imminent threat.

The whole purpose of the proposed missile defense shield intended to be deployed in eastern Europe is to reduce the strategic value of nuclear weapons (specifically Iran's or N. Korea's) as a threat to western nations from almost nothing to absolutely nothing.

Achmedinjad and the Mullahs are the protocol, A. is an extremely religious guy and the Mullahs insane. According to the Sunni doctrine. In order for the 5th Mahdi(fifth and last pillar in Islam) to come everything must be destroyed first and this is exactly what will happen when we let these insanity develop.

Ahmadinejad and the Mullahs are not Sunni, they are Shia and follow Shia doctrine and not Sunni Doctrine.

There is no 5th Mahdi. In fact the majority of Muslims who are Sunni don't believe in the Mahdi or Shia doctrine.

The fifth pillar of Islam according to Shia Doctrine is: Last Judgment, God's final assessment of humanity.

The fifth pillar of Islam according to Sunni doctrine is: Performing the Hajj.

Where do you get this stuff from?

Iran says U.S. attack option is a 'joke'

True, but they won't be laughing when one of our closest allies does it for us.

And how long have they been saying that they will strike Iran?

A few years at least. Nothing yet.

I wonder why?

...But maybe the Americans are serious about having a nuclear-free Middle East and they'll decide to launch pre-emptive attacks on its only nuclear state (and, to make matters worse, one with an astonishing history of naked aggression and violation of UN resolutions.)

There is little chance that America will destroy the nuclear reactor in Iran despite the way that the Islamic dictatorship ignore the UN, threaten other countries and subjugate their own people.

Good effort but having an as yet non-functioning nuclear power plant (thanks in part to the yanks, who were remarkably keen on a nuclear Iran until the Iranians had the good sense to kick out their imperial overlords) doesn't make them a nuclear state. But having several hundred nuclear warheads does - and that's exactly what the zionist entity has.

Ok, so the you consider the UN inspectors to be  imperial overlords. That's nice.

The Iranians had made several agreements and promises. They broke all of them. The fact of the matter is that no one would object if the Iranians were not threatening to launch nukes against multiple countries.  If you were a Gulf oil state and the welfare of your citizens was constantly threatened and the major route to sell your oil could be cut off any day by a despot, you might be worried too. If you are a resident of the UK or a country along the missile trajectory from Iran, you might be concerned. After all, Iran has said it would launch its nukes. Has Israel threatened have the heavens rain down the "fire of death" on any country in the EU?

Iran doesn't have nukes and denies trying to make them,

So how could they say they will launch their nukes when they deny having or wanting to have that capability.

Interesting how people make up stuff