jonclark

EC should be sacked (and probably jailed)- If he is ineligible why did they let him stand in the first place?  - If they are not checking the qualifications and eligibility of MPs prior to an election they are guilty of gross negligence. Have they checked the qualification and eligibility of all other MPs' before the election or not? If not why not? 

I mean Pita has been a sitting MP in parliment since the 2019 and the EC and (now) opposition MPs never once questioned his eligibility in the previous 4 years. He has had these 'shares' in a now defunct company (its now Thai PBS not iTV which is the 'dead' media company), which disappeared and was wound up back in 2006/7. 

6 hours ago, Captain Monday said:

This Englisher is a fool who should be scorned and ridiculed.

 

I would have thought that the seller should be named and shamed or are we just going for the old cheap shot of victim blaming? 

Urine contains the waste products of metabolism. Urea. Sticking it back into your body after it's been removed just means you have to work your kidneys harder to get it out again.  Seriously,bodily wastes do not improve health.

Lets see what happens when the law suits start to pile up for the government as legal businesses are shut down.  And lets not forget MFP - like PT are part of the reason that the use of cannabis is so widespread - They never turned up to vote on the cannabis bill in early January - whcih has created this mess. And now they act like its someone elses fault. 

1 hour ago, AndyFoxy said:

I've got it, but you expect me to do your job for you? Seems like you can't face the truth or you've smoked too much and motivation levels are low. ???? Have a nice day and goodbye.

I do not expect you to do 'my job' but it is a fair expectation to ask you to support your, as of yet unsubstantiated and fake claims, that cannabis is "dangerous and addictive" Your refusal to substantiate your claims, can lead to only one logical conclusion; that this refusal is an admission on your part that your claims are 100% fake. Thank you. 

Peace Bro. 

44 minutes ago, AndyFoxy said:

If you can focus long enough, I suggest you do some research.

So you cannot support your own comments about cannabis being "dangerous and addictive" with evidence then? Well that's a bit embarrassing for you isn't it?

Next time I respectfully suggest you refrain from commenting on topics you clearly know very little about and let the big boys talk amongst themselves. Have a nice day and goodbye. 

16 minutes ago, AndyFoxy said:

I think cannabis is more dangerous than sex, although I abstain from both just to be safe.

Well at least we can take comfort from the fact that your genes will not be spreading any further in the human population. 

 Seriously prove cannabis is dangerous and addictive - you said it as a statement of truth in your previous post, so substantiate your version of truth with evidence...otherwise you are just presented unsubstantiated opinion as fact.  aka Fake news. 

I think Foxy will reply along the lines of i don't have time / need to prove myself to anyone... or not reply at all... 

33 minutes ago, AndyFoxy said:

Addictive and dangerous.

Just like sex eh? Highly addictive for some and so many dangerous life threatening conditions that can be caught...and still our population continues to inexorable rise. 

I think sex is more dangerous than cannabis - prove me wrong foxy? 

2 hours ago, Don Chance said:

This is the problem they are tells lies to get marijuana  decriminalized.   Same in the west, people believe marijuana is somesort of medicine. It is just a drug to get high and very addictive for some people. It is not an answer to life.

TBH social media is highly addictive and in Thailand we see record numbers of internet addicts - records indicate that one average Thais spend 8 hours a day (33% of their daily lives) blankly looking at a screen looking for life's answers - Maybe social media could be classified as a narcotic as well, as it is clearly highly addicitive to Thais.  Or will that be overlooked? 

Obvioulsy the answer is yes it will be overlooked, we will allow Thai people to continue with their social media addiction as this additiction generates a wonderful, large and continuous revenue stream for the mobile operators and their powerful mates. 

Why should the alleged high levels harm and additiction from cannabis consumption be singled out as a single overriding factor to re-classify cannabis as a narcotic. If addictive properties are the benchmark that Thai society uses to determine whether an activity is narcotic in its effect then lets at least be consistant in it application. Or  - and this is real pie in the sky thinking - lets provide clear eduction and resources so that people can make informed decisions on what constitutes a healthy lifestyle  - which as my old gran once taught me  - too much of a good thing, becomes a bad thing.  

Drug use is a social not a criminal issue. People take drugs to fill a void in their lives (not because they are weak or bad). Drug addicts - ranging from smokers, to alcoholics, to yaba junkies are all similar in that they have voids that the drugs fill to greater or lesser extents. Labelling a drug user a criminal only increases their social isolation and stigma. It does not promote and provide avenues to a better more managed life, but reinforces their isolation and hopelessness through social stigmatization. 

Thailand has always walked a diplomatic tight rope balancing historical alliances with Chinese influence.  That balancing act has become more difficult with Chinese expansionism and Thailand reliance on China for tourists, funding of infrastructure projects and closer co operation. Eventually everyone slips on a tightrope.

2 hours ago, AndyFoxy said:

One thing I find interesting is cannabis users are all "peace man" or "it doesn't make one aggressive man". But looking at the responses from the pro-marijuana crowd on here tells me they are actually quite aggressive and not that peaceful when someone doesn't agree with their drug habits.

I think you're equating disagreement with aggression which it isn't. Everyone is entitled to push back and speak their mind especially on a forum like this. Doesn't mean they are aggressive. They may upset you, but that is not aggression. 

6 hours ago, AndyFoxy said:

You don't believe marijuana is a gateway drug? Many people started with marijuana, only to move on to harder drugs later.

I do think it is a gateway drug, in the same way that Cigarettes' are - I mean if you gonna smoke something first its got to be cigarettes' hasn't it given their wide availability and cheapness, after that well a drink would b nice to have with a smoke, and then maybe some weed, (cause I had a drink and am feeling experimental). Obviously this doesn't apply to everyone but we clearly need to protect the weakest and most vulnerable in society so we must ban all gateway drugs.

Often we talk about the dangers of drugs and addiction and the need for banning and enforcement of rules and punishments. But the most addictive 'drug' is not actually a drug, it's  social media. Social media creates huge mental health issues amongst the young, is a hot bed of crime and fraud and there is a very large body of evidence that indicate that unregulated social media use does increase suicide like behaviors. Any addictive behavior supported by evidence that leads to death in some instances - ban it right now. 

Right now where did I leave my skins?