JonnyF

Who knows? There hasn't been a trial yet. From the message it sounds like consensual sex without a condom.

So if he creates his own version of YouTube and posts a video, that is proof that he hasn't been cancelled? ???????? You're on top form today Chohmpherh. Good stuff ????

Is that the best you've got? ???? I wasn't looking for a quote from one of your fridge magnets. You won't answer because you know I am correct. Answering truthfully would highlight that. The BBC, Channel 4 and YouTube are cancelling him. They are all left leaning. https://www.forbes.com/sites/evangerstmann/2021/03/22/what-is-cancel-culture/?sh=18e7a4c9bd55

Possibly, but that's not how I read it. When a girl inists I wear a condom I'm thinking sex is on the cards. As would most men. Here's a crazy idea. Maybe a trial would be helpful to establish what happened before we ruin his life by canceling his life's work?

No to what? To sex without a condom? When a girl insists on a condom, it suggests she is consenting to sex. Or was she insisting on a condom before they started doing the laundry?

Answer the question.

Sounds like an argument over a condom. Like she asked him to wear one and he refused, or maybe secretly took it off during the act. This is why it's a good idea to have a trial in a court, rather than by social media.

You don't think the BBC, Channel 4 and YouTube are left leaning? Or you don't think they are cancelling him?

Let's add the BBC and Channel 4 to YouTube. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12535315/Russell-Brand-removed-BBC-iPlayer-sex-assault-claims.html Funny how the cancellers are always left leaning.

Nonsense. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/01/13/reaching-net-zero-would-cost-taxpayers-twice-much-no-10s-estimates/ Support? How does one support a policy without voting for them? Are you implying I stand outside Number 10 Waving a Tory scarf and chanting "There's only one Rishi Sunak"?

Wait until they see how much it's going to cost them. You think Sunak is rolling back on this because he thinks it's a vote loser? https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/public-support-majority-net-zero-policies-unless-there-is-a-personal-cost PS I don't vote Tory, but nice Strawman. Bravo.

He's certainly not wasting any time trying to extract every last Baht from the population. I'm guessing he had a bit of a shock when he was allowed to have a look at the books and saw how much has been stolen from the country since 2014. Now he's in a panic trying to make sure the place doesn't go down the pan. After 9 years with the snouts in the trough, the carcass has been stripped to the bone and tax payers are going to be fleeced to pay for it.

An excellent article on the absurdity of Big Tech deplatforming him. https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/09/19/big-tech-must-not-be-judge-jury-and-executioner/

This will form part of his next manifesto. At least I hope it does, because it will be very popular with the electorate who are sick of the green agenda and being forced to accept a lower standard of living at a higher cost to appease the doomsday cult of climate alarmism.

They voted for the Conservative party Chomhpherh. We don't vote for "the president" in Britain. You're not in Kansas anymore. Heat pumps are extremely ineffecient at very low temperates typical of a British winter. Plus they cost thousands to install. Same as EV's reduce petrol bills. As long as you have 20 grand to buy one. OK for you sat in your ivory tower preaching about the cult of climate alarmism, many people don't have that kind of money to waste on the folly of net zero. Good job Rishi.

Or don't hold the 'wrong' views. Or don't get accused of something from 20 years ago.

Of course not. The issue is having your ability to support yourself and your family removed before you've even BEEN investigated. But you already knew that...

It's a scary thing. All you need now is an accusation and your ability to support yourself and your family is removed within days. Welcome to 2023. Trial by social media. Guilty until proven innocent.

Indeed. A great tool. But when you look at the profile of the owners and the culture within the company it becomes all too clear why they are canceling people they disagree with. They're a bit like Twitter before Musk came along.

I think he's saying Masterson was guilty so Brand must be guilty as well. Another poster knew he was guilty "just by looking at his face". Another is denying YouTube cancelled him over this. I think your expectations might be too high given the type of posters on this thread. ????

#believeallwomen was a ridiculous concept. Because of course, women NEVER lie ????. I can't stand Brand. Just his voice winds me up, the dropping of the T's in every word is enough to make me switch off. But canceling him before he's seen the inside of a court is absolutely shameful behaviour. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? YouTube have essentially removed his ability to support himself on the basis of an unsubstantiated claim. Contemptible. If found not guilty I hope he sues them to oblivion.

Good move by Sunak. Nobody voted to be poorer. The obsession with net zero is just making people's lives miserable.

That's not really how they do it here. They make blanket laws that in effect cover everyone. Then they selectively apply it to the groups that the law was intended to apply to. Keeps it simple for them in terms of drafting the law, and also keeps their options open if they wish to apply it to more groups in the future they don't need to amend the law. There is no way they are going to apply this to Brian Smith from Rotherham and his meagre pension spent in the bars of Pattaya. I'd expect a clarification/reassurance from them pretty shortly. Misunderstood this blah blah misinterpreted that blah blah.

YouTube for starters. https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-66851698 Deplatforming him and taking away his living before he's even been before a judge/jury. Cancel culture at it's finest. Once again by lefty bekind tech billionaires. You must be loving this.????

If concerns over his behaviour were not based on morals, what were they based on?