Jump to content

bluesofa

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    17,908
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bluesofa

  1. I went to Laos on a cycling trip. On my return to Thailand, I knew I should do the correct thing and register having returned to my house, via a TM30.


    Actually, I re-entered Thailand on 10 January, stayed at a couple of guest houses on the way home. Went home, didn’t stay there, but went straight out again to see my wife who was staying in Bangkok, visiting her sister there.

     

    We all came back home to Udon on 19 January. 
    In the afternoon I went to Udon Immigration with the TM30 filled in by the housemaster, along with a copy of their ID and house registration. Very helpful IO there said I also needed to complete a TM28 for change of address. I did that, although I couldn’t work out why I needed  a TM30 and a TM28 on the same day?

     

    While I was there I queried about a new 90 day registration date. He said sure, and just manually changed the date, writing a new one on the original 90 day yellow slip in my passport, which was fine.

  2. 39 minutes ago, nisakiman said:

    I remember reading years ago that someone tested various bottles of Singha and found that the ABV varied between 5% and 9% (not sure if those figures are correct, but it was somewhere around there) depending on the batch. How much truth there is in that I have no idea, but it wouldn't surprise me. They don't seem to be big on QC in Thailand.

    What you've said rings a bell with me too.

     

    Twenty-five years ago in the UK we used to cook and sell Thai food in pubs, just as it was starting to become popular. We also sold to the landlord boxes of Singha on sale-or-return as an additional income for the Thai-night.

    IIRC there was a company somewhere near Slough that had the monopoly on importing Beer Singha and Mekhong Whiskey. If we ordered I think 20 boxes at a time, they would deliver free to anywhere in the UK.

     

    There were regular customers who commented the same, regarding the variation in strength.

  3. 9 minutes ago, tryasimight said:

    As an Aussie on holidays I got adventurous and tried real ale after many lagers in the Uk at the Trip to Jerusalem I think it was called - some castle.

    I think the first was called and tasted like Firkin ELL...then Firk That, followed by projectile vomiting in the main street of Nottingham.

    Never, ever again.

    Nottingham Castle. The Trip To Jerusalem is (supposed to be) the oldest pub in England, started in 1189.

    An excellent selection of real ale in there too. I lived about thirty miles from there.

  4. 1 minute ago, SunsetT said:

    Old Chang was 6.4% and I didnt like the taste at all; too sweet and sickly for me. I like the latest Chang which was originally declared to be 5% but I reckon it was still stronger than most other beers which are 5%, so I stayed with the others which I like as, unlike the OP, I want a decent taste with the least alcohol. Last time I looked Chang was labeled at 5.2% so I was right in that it was stronger, and I reckon that it could be even stronger than that.

    The declared strength against the actual strength. Isn't that one of those TIT situations?

     

    I'm sure I read months ago that the brewer is allowed something like a 0.5% "error" when declaring the ABV.

    Then there's the tax due on different ABVs.

    Hence by under-declaring the ABV by a small amount, the brewer is liable to pay tax at the lower rate. IIRC isn't Chang 5.2% in reality, but declared at 5%?

    I wait to be corrected on my faulty memory.

  5. 6 minutes ago, tinca tinca said:
    4 hours ago, davetrout said:

    Might save some Thai lives on the road 

    NO CHANCE....they can not take their booze  !!!

    While not defending drink-driving in any way, isn't the reason a lot of the population in this region seem to get drunk easily is due to their lactose intolerance - not tending to have dairy products in their diet?

    I'm sure someone better informed will put me straight if I've got that wrong.

     

  6. 4 hours ago, Lite Beer said:

    Used to be a great beer but is now totally undrinkable.

    Did you also notice that the bottles are smaller than they used to be.

     

    Smaller bottles, lower strength and tastes awful but the price keeps going up.

    Try Cheers Extra. 6%

    Chang and also Leo reduced their large bottle size well over a year ago, from 630ml to 620ml. The small bottle/can is still 330ml.

    No idea on Singha though?

     

    Slightly OT, going back 15/20 years ago there was a Thai produced dark beer called "Tai" that I thought was very good. 7 Eleven sold it. It seemed to last only perhaps a year, then disappeared.

  7.  

    2 minutes ago, Rimkok said:
    5 hours ago, bluesofa said:

    Or looking after his commanding officer's senile parents for a year, as my brother in law had to do.

    Hilarious!!

    It doesn't worry me you find it funny.

    I see it as typical of a corrupt society where in this case there are more conscripts than they know what to do with, so the higher layers make use of them, as the conscripts have no option but to do as they're told.

     

    Instead of reducing the numbers drafted each year, giving them more worthwhile training, they just carry on wasting public money, but that what's the government's good at.

     

    In my brother in law's case, he was basically a cleaner, cook and care-worker for them. I remember him telling me every day they asked for exactly the same food. An hour after they'd eaten it they would complain he hadn't fed them - due to their senility.

    They watched the same cartoons on the TV day after day, laughing at them as they didn't remember seeing them the day before.

    He had to wash the parents and perform just about every task for them.

    Still if the commanding officer can get his parents looked after for free, rather than paying, then he's going to do that if he can get away with it.

     

  8. I've been with AIS as a post paid customer for 13 years, no real complaints.

     

    However, if you do decide to move elsewhere, remember that you can take your existing mobile number with you to the new mobile service provider.

    It will cost you 30 Baht and should be transferred within a couple of days. The mobile companies have no option but to accept your request, it is part of the regulations, so if you do want to transfer your number don't be put off by someone telling you it's not possible.

     

  9. 15 minutes ago, BritTim said:

    I agree with you, but I am not sure the law makes a distinction, and think it would be difficult to word the law to allow such a distinction. In the example you give, let's say you use the completed boat for a month, then decide it is not really what you want, and you sell it. Have you at that point retrospectively "worked", even though it was originally personal DIY?

    I was thinking exactly the same thing.

    Even if there was a clearly defined time period from when you completed your personal repairs to when the boat was sold, there will no doubt be someone who might try to take advantage of it.

  10. 8 minutes ago, overherebc said:

    That is now the best post of the thread.

    You're not the only one who can't follow the thread as to what wanting a name and address is to do with not causing trouble?

    I'm completely baffled. Perhaps I should have ordered a bottle of whatever it was that poster must have had to drink?

    (Just my sense of humour!)

    • Like 1
  11. 6 minutes ago, pearciderman said:

     

    Nowhere does any law/rule or regulation mention "depriving a Thai" of a job ! People still post this myth. There is the list of prohibited professions - no mention of Thais or deprivation!

    At the risk of being boring, this is the latest copy I have.

    Not sure if there have been any minor changes recently - there has been talk about some though:

     

    Updated and released Oct 26th 2006 by the Royal Thai Government.

    Annex attached to the Royal Decree
    Prescribing works relating to occupation and professional in which an alien is prohibited to engage B.E.2522

    1. Manual work
    2. Work in agriculture, animal husbandry, forestry or fishery excluding specialized work in each particular branch or farm supervision
    3. Bricklaying, carpentry or other construction works
    4. Wood carving
    5. Driving mechanically propelled carried or driving non-mechanically-propelled vehicle, excluding international aircraft piloting
    6. Shop attendance
    7. Auction
    8. Supervising, auditing or giving service in accountancy excluding internal auditing on occasions
    9. Cutting or polishing jewelry
    10. Haircutting, hairdressing or beauty treatment
    11. Cloth weaving by hand
    12. Weaving of mate or making products from reeds, rattan, hemp, straw or bamboo pellicle
    13. Making of Sa paper by hand
    14. Lacquer ware making
    15. Making of Thai musical instrument
    16. Niello ware making
    17. Making of products from gold, silver or gold-copper alloy
    18. Bronze ware making
    19. Making of Thai dolls
    20. Making of mattress or quilt blanket
    21. Alms bowls casting
    22. Making of silk products by hand
    23. Casting of Buddha images
    24. Knife making
    25. Making of paper of cloth umbrella
    26. Shoemaking
    27. Hat Making
    28. Brokerage or agency excluding brokerage or agency in international trade business
    29. Engineering work in civil engineering branch concerning designing and calculation, organization, research, planning, testing, construction supervision or advising excluding specialized work
    30. Architectural work concerning designing, drawing of plan, estimating, construction directing or advising
    31. Garments making
    32. Pottery or ceramic ware making
    33. Cigarette making by hand
    34. Guide or conducting sightseeing tours
    35. Street Vending
    36. Type setting of Thai characters by hand
    37. Drawing and twisting silk-thread by hand
    38. Office or secretarial work
    39. Legal or lawsuit services

     

  12. 25 minutes ago, stevenl said:

    The question and discussion is about exerting effort in your own house, not in a commercial enterprise.

    Is that for sure - are you certain about that? I don't know if there's an official definition regarding separating home from work (even though you could work at home).

    From what I've read, the decision seems to be always "at the discretion of the investigating officer".

     

    I'm not trying to make a clever point, it's a straight question.

    • Like 1
    • Sad 1
  13. The banking inconsistency here is nothing new. 

     

    As previous posters have already said, it's more or less down to the manager, hence the different answers with the same bank, but a different branch.

     

    Twenty years ago I went into the branch where I had my account and asked for change for the business (20 & 100 Baht notes, 5 & 10 Baht coins, about 10,000 Baht's worth).

    The staff five times in succession just came out with the old 'no have'. Found another bank where I didn't have an account, they were happy to give me change on most occasions.

     

    Eventually went into my bank along with my business partner, and asked for change again: 'No have'.

    We both asked them to close our two accounts (3M Baht in each account), as they were not looking after us. Asked for a bankers draft for both balances and told the staff the other bank we were going to deposit it with.

    Naturally, they immediately said we could have change every day. Too late. Moved banks.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...