rwilem

I think for everything one does at it immigration they want a copy of the front page, and copy of the current extension.

And were apparent to anyone following the 2020 campaign. The eventual commander-in-chief' was a 'gaffe-in-waiting', thus the remote, work-from-home (basement Biden) campaign, limited appearances, interviews, etc. Now it's becoming clear the lengths to which WH aides, Doc Jill and others went to conceal Biden's ever-declining capabilities from the public at large. But they all knew all along, Joe was gone. https://nypost.com/2024/12/19/us-news/white-house-aides-hid-bidens-apparent-mental-decline-from-day-1-of-his-presidency-explosive-report-reveals/

Absolutely. There is a lefty-oriented echo chamber already on X, a remnant of the Dorsey-run site. Still relevant, active, free to do it's thing. Musk liberated X, allowing for alternate views by lifting the censorship. Result? Real competition of ideas in the marketplace expressed on a major social media platform. Who would want to be against that? Lefties had so enjoyed the heavy-handed censorship of the earlier twitter, leading them to a false belief they were right, and owned the market with their views on political and other issues. Not so fast, it turned out. At least since Musk acquired it, that is. And now with the '24 election/rejection of the dims and Harris in the books, and their utter shock of Trump's victory, one of their scapegoats to explain it is X. Just another moment of the "You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!" So now lefties doing what they do best. Flee in the face of truth and reality. Gotta get to a 'safe space'. It does provide a chuckle or two when reading all the "I am/I will be leaving X because.....". If bluesky didn't exist, you'd have to invent it.

Excuse the duplicate posts, some issues with that. Can add, from a GOP staffer, “It’s silly to pretend this is just a skinny CR,” one GOP staffer told said. “It’s a three-month spending bill with ornaments hanging all over it.”

You would hope, but no.

You would hope, but no.

Still burdening others with her 'unburdening'. Kamala's goin' for CA guv'ner, book it!

Acrobat is good, yes, but about a year ago the app required some user permissions. I guess that's so you can edit files? I tend not to use apps, if it can be helped, that require those permissions. To just read and save pdf files, pdf viewer is a basic, no frills option. No permissions requested. Free version does the job. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pspdfkit.viewer

Answer below

Thanks for the update. There are so many different configurations, offers, on these one year sims. I checked my usage for the past several months, using a dtac 30 Mbsp/unlimited, and I usually never even approached 100 GB in a month. Maybe once I had 105 or something. Sometimes 50 GB. So 100 GB certainly will work for me, I think the "20/100" sim will suffice. Even at the dtac advertised 30 Mbps the speed at times was sluggish. On facebook there are ads for 30 Mbsp unlimited one year sim cards, with dtac, True, and AIS priced very low, below 1500, 1400 baht. Was told by a fella working at one of the more established mobile shops at MBK, affiliated with A Lot Tech, that those are scams. Just to put that word out.

Was shopping around as the dtac 30 mbps unlimited one year sim I was using came to its end. Unlimited at speeds such as 15, 20 mbps are not available for both dtac and True. And neither offer a 30 mbps sim, that has passed. The 'sweet spot' (not bad speed and best monthly gig amount at such speed) are probably the 20 mbps, 100 GB sim. That one for both dtac and True are available from sellers at Lazada and Shopee. They don't seem to be sold by the mobile shops, for the most part, but NASA at MBK in Bangkok had a few on their price sheet last week, so it seems like they're available 'over-the-counter' there. (Sorry, don't know about AIS, but it's likely to have the same.) The 20 mbps, 100 GB sims are being priced around 2100-2200 baht, a little more or a little less from some of the Lazada and Shopee sellers. There are 'flash sales' which can knock a few hundred baht off the price for the True sims.

Trump had a final total of 55 counties that flipped for him in '24, after having gone for Biden in '20. Kamala did not get a single county flip of the more than 3140 counties! Not one. That had not happened in almost 100 years! In 1932 incumbent Herbert Hoover, in the midst of the great depression, was the last presidential candidate to not flip a county.

It's where the election was won. A clean sweep for Trump. Just unthinkable if not unbearable to Kamala supporters who assumed her and Walz winning as a matter of course. But in the wake of the Dems loss, their own insiders revealed Harris didn't have a shot at winning. The money quote: "Several campaign advisers for the Harris campaign admitted on the Pod Save America podcast, that “internal polling” showed that Harris “never took the lead over Trump.” “We didn’t get the breaks we needed on Election Day,” David Plouffe, a senior Harris campaign adviser stated. “I think it surprised people because there was these public polls that came out in late September, early October, showing us with leads that we never saw.” Translation: When Plouffe says they didn't get the breaks they needed on election day, assume he's referring to whatever number in the millions of 'missing ballots', ones that Joe Biden scored in his 81 million votes total in '20. The Dems simply could not cheat enough this time around in the circumstances of pandemic-free election. They still cheat, but Trump's turnout and votes total was indeed, 'too big to rig'. That basement Biden out-perfomed the first POC female prez candidate, and her 'joy and vibes' campaign, has to be galling for the Dems. And with the the regime media promoting non-stop all their anti-Trump narratives and all their biases on full display, no wonder the result was such a shock to the system for those who were drinking that kool-aid.

Get 'em before they're out the door, the line's over there. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14159181/biden-aides-mulling-preemptive-pardons-anthony-fauci-liz-cheney.html

A gun possession conviction. Pleading guilty to tax evasion. Contrary to Dems and regime media claims of 'Hunter's being targeted' those two cases were cover--'throw 'em a bone'--under the guise of continuing to try to keep the wraps on Joe's corruption, and that of the Biden crime family. https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/ There are links to many financial transactions of influence peddling from the investigation. Why does Biden's blanket pardon of Hunter starts from Jan. 1, 2014 and covers an 11-year period?! Joe and the entire family were involved in it. There were 173 bank transactions that were reported as 'suspicious activity', but treasury looked the other way. Elements of the intel apparatus worked with Hunter! Brother Jim should have some 'splaining to do, but he's not talking, and is probably wondering when he's gonna get his pardon. There is an overwhelming amount of factual evidence, and in the public domain, for anyone who cares to look, exposing the Biden crime family corruption. The justice department, prosecutors, regime media, politicians would rather cover it up, ignore it, dissemble and lie about it. Even RINOs are loathe to go pedal to the medal on this; most are already captured, compromised and controlled, and benefit from the system as is. Pelosi, Romney and Kerry's adult offspring--and probably more from the 'representatives' who are supposedly serving the people--have had, and perhaps continue to have--involvement in schemes in Ukraine. The dirty not-so-little secret is that it's a financial free-for-all, all funded by the U.S. taxpayer. A money-laundering, resource gobbling operation for the U.S. "military industrial congressional complex". (Yep, that's the term Ike had written for the warning in his farewell speech, but somehow he omitted saying the word 'congressional' when he delivered it.)