Jump to content

thaibeachlovers

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    69,863
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Everything posted by thaibeachlovers

  1. Took me a minute or two to understand that rear is not the word you intended to use.
  2. That's a very bizarre thing to say.
  3. Well said. Some people are just not inclined to put in the effort to learn how to do it properly, and prefer to blame something other than their lack of competence for their failure to please. Don't even need a hard on to get her off. Women's erogenous zones are not like men's- contained in one tiny area- they have more than two.
  4. Getting a woman off isn't about being hard. Read some books about how to do it properly, look at porn for handy hints, just stop blaming erectile dysfunction for failure to please.
  5. Any man that can be fooled by a fake one needs to find out a few things. A fake is nothing like a real one.
  6. Some things can't be faked. Try learning stuff. If a guy can't get his partner off he isn't doing it right. Don't blame age- it's a chemical reaction to stimulus, end of.
  7. If the problem is erectile gaining libido without the ability to use it would be cruel.
  8. Agree, but Thailand was a close to Paradise as I'm ever going to find on this rotten world.
  9. That's not normal, especially as you are sometimes "interested". However, take advantage of it. You'll be wealthier if you never have the urge again, as long as you don't keep supporting a woman without any benefits. I'd have been better off if I'd lost "interest" at 20.
  10. Women disagree with you. Both mine decided that they could cut me off that sort of thing and I'd still be an ATM. They were wrong.
  11. You seem like the sort of person the so called health industry loves, as you help make them rich with their BS alternative therapies. I also contributed till I woke up and realised it's all smoke and mirrors. Cialis works, and I had zero side effects. Giving it a go doesn't mean you have to continue if there are side effects. Of course, you could just buy her a rabbit for Christmas and live a lesser life.
  12. Many men think their new woman is "perfect" That rarely turns out to be true either.
  13. Well, if you don't want to explain your strange post I'll good you into invisibility. You'll probably think that is good too. Bye.
  14. Sooo, adventure tourists going to a live volcano have to be "protected" from any possible harm. What BS! NZ has IMO become the ultimate nanny state- where did it all go so wrong? IMO it comes down to whether the tourists were advised of the risks and signed that they accepted the risks. If they did, they have no right to expect protection from any and all risks, beyond reasonable precautions. NZ used to be a country for real men, but that was long ago.
  15. I'm at a loss to understand your point. Heard what before?
  16. Just curious. Is not trying to murder someone going to result in severe enough penalty that they have to load the charge with miscellaneous extras? It's like the hate crime is more heinous than attempted murder.
  17. Goodness me, one would have to have been living in a cave on a desert island since 2016 to not know that he is a jerk. He's not going to win based on being a nice human being. He's going to win because she failed to stop the illegals, she is a warmonger, and she has no policies of her own. Plus, she speaks weirdly.
  18. If Harris suffered half the attacks Trump does she would have never come out of her bunker till it was all over.
  19. Is your nickname for Trump "arris"? I agree with you if it is. She is a right nutter IMO.
  20. The election looks so close that even a few votes could be the decider, or a few less votes for Harris- same result. I'm sure there are a few out there that didn't know before that have not yet voted.
  21. global peace. They seem somewhat stupid then. He started no new wars first time around, ergo the world was more peaceful during his time as POTUS. Harris was VP while 1 major war started and another conflict started that looks like expanding into a full blown M E war. Both only continue with her full collusion and support. So a man that started no wars vs a warmonger, yet the Economist claims he is a threat to global peace. Can't make stuff like this up.
  22. They will also know what sort of underhand methods her supporters resort to against him. Another frivolous lawsuit isn't going to lose him any votes- devious so called news organisations cheating to protect her probably will.
  23. In a crazy world the one thing we can be 100% certain about is that billions are being spent to develop autonomous fighting machines. Humans are great at inventing new ways to kill each other- ways to live in peace and harmony not so much.
×
×
  • Create New...