thaibeachlovers

My point is as always I don't trust scientists that depend on having the correct explanations to secure their funding. At any mention of human caused temperature rise I stop reading.

Are you?

I don't care whatever excuses you come up with. Biden, IMO is the worst possible president and if it takes Trump to give him the order of the boot, then so be it. Plus it'll be so entertaining seeing the snowflakes crying on U Tube.

That's not my recollection. Sessions recused himself because of something to do with Russia, and was only sacked after the mid term election. Trump should have sacked him soon as he recused himself.

There is no profit in peace, but perhaps they can see that the Ukraine war is almost done so no more taxpayer largesse there, and perhaps another starting in a different part of the world and want to be ready to profit from it. Just saying.

I think he misses the point of it all, which IMO has been to enrich the weapons manufacturers ie the 1%.

Well, it's great to see someone that actually understands war is saying it's over, all bar the shouting. I especially like the bit about The Western defense base is pathetic. That's what I've been saying on the forum on the threads about NATO. Far as I can see, for whatever reason, Europe, including Britain have been emasculating their military ever since the cold war supposedly ended- idiots.

The squatters are the illegal israeli settlers stealing Palestinian land, and the Palestinians own the land in the west bank and Gaza, not the israelis. Do try and get it right

There were 2.3 million in Gaza before the israelis killed over 30,000 of them. Are you saying the 10 year old girls that got bombed to death were involved in October 7 and deserved to die, or are you saying all Gazans are terrorists, and deserve to die, or are you saying, oops, 30,000 Gazans should have moved to those safe zones the israelis keep bombing? Either you are OK with killing little children or you are not. It doesn't matter where they live. How many children can the israelis kill before you consider them to be the bad guys? Is it the actions of good guys to fire into a crowd of unarmed people trying to get food because they are starving?

Funny way of having peace and quiet then. Perhaps they want the peace of the graveyard. If you are correct, then israel will never have peace, and will always be afraid of the Palestinians ( with good reason after killing over 30,000 of them ). Small boys will grow up waiting till they are old enough to join whatever organisation is fighting israel. Welcome to the forever war. Israelis should listen to their prophets. https://www.gotquestions.org/sow-wind-reap-whirlwind.html Hosea 8:7 makes the enigmatic statement, “For they sow the wind, and they shall reap the whirlwind.”

It is warming, but you can't prove that we caused it.

You really are hilarious. You completely made up what the thread is about and thought you would get away with it. To be precise the thread is about scientists freaking out and ocean temperatures, not about human produced carbon dioxide. Scientists Are Freaking Out About Ocean Temperatures

Could be a problem in a country with a high rate of obesity. Just too fat to know. Apparently many women don't have regular periods so missing a couple might not be worrying.

As long as he is against genocide I'm for him.

error

Did Gordon ever smile? At least he got his just rewards for wasting 6 billion quid on the NHS ( which went for more managers- my department got 2 more of the wastes of space ) when the voters dumped him.

Any reason why they shouldn't? As long as it's votes and not bullets It's OK in my book. I hope it might make some politicians think before voting to send bombs to israel.

No I really didn't. I don't keep up with all the trendy sayings as there are so many of them. However, while I won't use it myself on this forum, I'll be muttering it every time I see that man mentioned.

Excellent post. Worth more than a like emoji.

I've seen plenty of threads on AN go off into the weeds, but diverting from "mob rule in Britain" to the best fish and chips in Thailand has to win the prize.

That's not the correct question IMO. I think the real question is would any of them commit a terrorist attack if they had the opportunity?

I agree with all of that EXCEPT the rant about Brexit. Best thing to happen to Britain since the EEC decided to go political IMO. IMO the EU is a vile organisation with a cabal of decision makers that answer to no one. They can't even secure their borders- useless pack of wombles.

You are so funny, really. I've often said I don't support Trump except that he's a less bad option that Biden ( or HRC ), so I'd vote for him on that basis. I said I'd vote for a rock over her. I've even said ( I guess you missed it ) that I'd support Bernie over him ( shame that he got back stabbed by the swampy people ). If the Dems put up a competent candidate that wasn't corrupt, and was able to unite the country, and had a decent foreign policy ( one that didn't involve giving lots and lots of bombs to kill children ), I'd be for them, boots and all. It's a bit different now, given all the political shennanigans by the Dems and fellow travelers weaponising the ?justice? system to bring him down. I don't like crooks and bullies in the establishment, so I'd like to see Trump be able to take revenge on them by winning. So, I guess, in a way I am a Trump supporter, but not in the way you mean.

No idea what "let's go Brandon" means so it can't be very insulting. I've never said that trump has class, whatever you mean by that, but I prefer him to Biden in every aspect. I can't think of a single thing that Biden has that makes him a suitable POTUS, and many that make him unsuitable. Trump wasn't suitable either, but he wasn't picked for being "suitable". He didn't get to bring the corrupt establishment down last time, but if he has another chance he might, so worth voting for, IMO.

Ooh that's going to annoy the Trump haters, 55555555555. I didn't think there was immunity for presidents, even during their time in office, but I guess it explains why Nixon wasn't tried as a war criminal for the illegal invasion of Cambodia ( and Bush the younger for that matter ) or Reagan for the Contras.