JAG

No, he admits to living on B700 a day.

Duplicate post.

I doubt it really crosses their minds, let alone giving them cause to think about it. I say hello, occasionally lend a ladder or similar, and occasionally hire one to work in the garden or other odd jobs. I am a retired teacher, and am occasionally asked to help out in the local school. Cue the inevitable hysteria about work permits...

Fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down! Mind you, 'tis one of the best impressions of a bulldog chewing a wasp I've seen for quite some time!

Questionable? Cash on delivery is a long standing practice!

No-one denies that some British people can be silly, make mistakes and make foolish statements at times, which of course are magnified by "social media". You are, I understand from Scandinavia (Sweden)? It must be a great relief to know that the Nordic gene pool does not allow such things to happen!

In my experience at my local rural hospital you will be able to see a doctor within at most 3 hours of presenting yourself, and the hospital has a small laboratory capable of testing and quickly diagnosing the prevalent local diseases, which include scrun typhus.

Well of course if the post is to go to a General it will no doubt go to a consumate ptofessional and universally highly regarded officer, one with extensive operational command experience, who has led troops in conflict zones, probably with a couple of gallantary awards, a couple of tours with "special forces" under his belt and experience of managing and balancing the complex tactical, technical and logistical demands of modern high intensity war fighting. On the other hand...

Of course not!

Lost cause I am afraid. How long before he really turns on the media and his political opponents? Not long I suspect: precedents are being set, masked unidentified "Federal Agents" operating with no apparent accountability, troops deployed on the streets at his command, concentration camps being set up. Perhaps a year? Enjoy the media satire while it lasts, sites like the one above, "Diaper Diplomacy", will be amongst the first to go.

The Lancet should really "get with the times". These are poor, brown, foreign people. Diaper Donnie simply doesn't care!

Not a hope in hell. The Army is firmly back in charge.

There is no "new line of thinking", since when did the military and ultra nationalist dinosaurs think of anything new or innovative? The thinking is you had your vote, you had a - "sort of" elected government for a couple of years, now we are back in charge to put everything back to the way it was.

Eau de didn't quite make it to the toilette?

There is much in what you say, although I find the thought that the creature is anybody's "wet dream" deeply disturbing!

It must be so, I have it on impeccable authority that it was in one of the encrypted files on Hunter Biden's laptop!

What about the watches?

Partially digested...

Expended a lot of blood and treasure in two wars (Iraq and Afghanistan) in which we fought alongside your (s-hole) country at your request. Only to see you spectacularly bug out. 636 of our servicemen and servicewomen died fighting alongside yours. Not too bad for a s-hole country I would suggest!

Magnificent? They waited until the Israelis had done the really dangerous bit, dismantling the Iranian air defences and command and communication networks, then bimbled in at high altitude, dropped their bombs and bimbled off again. It was a display of the unparalleled technology owned by the US Air force, but hardly magnificent!

Eau de diaper?

Ofcom is simply selecting a jolly handy stick with which to bash GB News.

In fact, why not just go and see a doctor?

Umh, nor was the guy before him. If you may remember he (the guy before him) stopped an election because he didn't like the person and party which was winning. He then ruled as head of a Junta for 9 years. The principal achievement of that junta was to introduce the current constitution which is being exploited to attempt to remove yet another elected (although flawed) government. These "constitutions" are hardly the sacred documents they are held up to be - there have been 20 in the last 90 years! Nevertheless the present government was "elected" according to the principles stipulated by the current constitution.

There are occasions @JonnyF when I find myself in limited agreement with some of the points you make in posts, on some aspects of UK domestic politics; but this is simply one of the most asinine things I think I have ever read in a commentary on North American politics!