Jump to content

jcsmith

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,070
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by jcsmith

  1. The China thing is hilarious since Bolton has revealed that Trump basically asked them for help to get re-elected and got rebuffed. Let's not forget he was praising China when Covid was in the early times. Then when he realized he didn't get his way he's back on the attack. 

    Same with the Iraq War thing. Trump was also in support of it, no matter how many times he tries to make it seem like he wasn't. He pretends that things like video and audio do not exist. 

    • Like 2
  2. 21 minutes ago, scammed said:

    i think he is roughly as detrimental to USA as every president after clinton,

    but not nearly as bad as biden will be

    Okay I'll play along. What did Obama do that was so detrimental to the country? Bush gave us 9/11, and the economic collapse. Trump gave us the largest health crisis in ages, turned all of our allies against us, and was caught red-handed trying to cheat in the election twice, and is trying again with mail in ballots. Obama recovered us from the financial crisis,  and got our economy back on track. What negative things did he have that are on par with those two?

    • Like 1
  3. On 8/25/2020 at 7:42 AM, Mama Noodle said:

     

    We dont know if he was unarmed. He was resisting arrest and going to the drivers seat of his car like he was on a mission though. 

    His kids were in the car. And while it has been reported that he did have a knife in the car, it was sitting in the passenger side panel and he doesn't appear to go for the knife. It's hard to tell what was being said though as the police were not wearing body cams. 

    • Like 1
  4. 11 hours ago, ExpatOK said:

    How about waking up and smelling the coffee and admit Donald J. Trump is one of the best presidents ever?

    He's the least popular president at least in modern history since they started tracking it. If he was even close to an average president that wouldn't be the case. But I'll give his supporters an opportunity to prove that point. What things have happened in his 3 1/2 years as president can you point to in order to make that case? 

    • Like 1
  5. 2 hours ago, nausea said:

    The real problem here is you're setting a precedent. Plenty of guys know lots of stuff - savee?

    Yeah I get it. It's not an easy one. I can understand both sides there. I personally lean a bit more lenient to him, though I do think he should probably serve some time over it. But given what he leaked I think that should factor in and the sentencing should be lenient.

  6. I don't think pardoning Snowden would be a terrible action, to be honest. And this is coming from a person who knows full and well the gravity of him leaking information is (having held one). But it's not a black and white issue. On one hand the leaking itself is a massive betrayal but on the other hand it helped to expose a pretty serious violation of privacy that we might still not be aware of otherwise. He also wasn't putting people in danger or selling secrets or anything of that matter. I personally feel like the best end to the Snowden fiasco would be for the government to give him a deal where he serves a small amount of time for his crimes but I could live with a pardon.

  7. 10 hours ago, simple1 said:

    No, it is not 'one official's opinion', plenty of ex trump administration officials have spoken out against him. So far as I'm concerned trump administration, more accurately trump himself, doesn't have any credibility so far as his domestic policies and his international affairs pronouncements, completely untrustworthy. His appointees appear to have forgotten they are sworn to protect the Constitution, not a wannabe king.

    There have also been quite a few books that are ripe with quotes filled with officials making similar statements about Trump. It shouldn't be so hard for people to accept. The problem is that the people who those books are targeted are the least likely people to read them. Similar to the statements from last night. They might draw in some independents but many in Trump's base are unlikely to ever hear them.

  8. 2 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

    I don't blame Trump for doing that. Why on earth would he give them the rope to hang him ( and that does not mean I think there was any rope in the first place ). It was, IMO, so obviously an attempt to stitch him up that no rational person would willingly co operate with them, even if having nothing to fear.

    If he did not legally have to do more, then he was doing what most of us would have done in that situation.

     

    Where that argument fails is that one can beat the Mueller, Mueller, Mueller drum as much as one wants, but the reality is it produced nothing sufficient to convict him of in the trial.

    With regards to the the interview, he refused to answer, was vague, or lied in some of his responses. Then refused follow ups. I can semi-understand the argument that Trump would incriminate himself of perjury in any interview, but the written responses were responses that his lawyers could review to avoid that. Yet he still refused to respond. Obviously because he was afraid of incriminating himself. That may have been a sound legal strategy, but it certainly doesn't mean that he was innocent. If anything it makes it obvious that he is hiding something.

    There were multiple clear cut obstruction cases, which is what downed Nixon. It was pointless to pursue them beyond what was done though as he was never going to be impeached in the Senate.

    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...