sirineou

What you mean "What?" You said "The Judge's comment that DA Willis displayed a “tremendous lapse in judgment” could still take a part in any proceeding. " This was taken out of context. The context was in the appointment , which you failed to mention, and not on her judgment in the case. which is what one would infer from your reply. I am sure it was unintentional and i should not had made the "Conveniently" comment , but not the less factual. You are stating the obvious. Obviously it was available since he used it. But that was not my point. Not sure what that means, if you would expand a bit more perhaps I could comment. A minor inconvenience for who? and why?

You need to stop thinking

I am sure , what initially ignited was the petrol part.

I am sure it was a consenting relationship. Because when the boy asked if it was OK, the horse said Neyeaaa.

Suffering from dyslexia . upon reading the story I was relieved to find out that the crass was not with a ferry or in a ferry .

A foreigner would not be usund a flip flop.

He was more than that, he was the one with the presidential power of life and death. In appointing the attorney!! In fact I quote, "Judge McAfee clarified that while there's no evidence of an actual conflict resulting from the relationship, the appearance of impropriety could compromise public perception of the case's integrity. " which you conveniently left out from your above opinion. I agree with Judge McAfee 100% ,and have said so from day one, that the prosecuting attorney should had been removed from this case . With him there , even if the trial was 100% fair,(which will be) when trump is found guilty in the end, it would had given his apologists something to hug their hat on. Behind the prosecuting attorney there is a whole team, I am sure one of them can take over, if not plenty of other attorneys that can easily take over. To all the trump apologists, notice that trump is not dying to have his case heard and his innocence proven. Delay . delay . and more delay. Why? because he knows that which we all know, and is hoping for a political change that would provide a political solution to his problem rather than a legal one. He is indeed a "bilko artist/ coup leader " and there is only one place appropriate for him and it is not the White House, but it is the big house. Sadly I am afraid he will not serve one day of his life in jail. Jail is for the poor and powerless. Ways will be found for him to stay out of jail and a final decision delayed until after he dies, which I am sure everyone , including all the spineless so called republicans, hopes will be soon .

everyone should be burning her books, Nothing that popcorn trash . The movies were OK for children but IMO her books only value other than lite entertainment would be the warmth they provide while burning.

I am more interested in Buddha's reaction.

Who could possibly attain you eloquence and remain mortal?

So now that we looked at what you said then , let's look at what you are saying now. "No one is forcing them to be something they ain't. " Perhaps not now, but it did back then , and if the magamorons have their way, they will again. "If they were born with a penis they are a man and a woman if they weren't. " That is absolutely not correct. What is it that makes you a man or a woman, is it a penis, ar are there other characteristics. some of them mental. "During early development the gonads of the fetus remain undifferentiated; that is, all fetal genitalia are the same and are phenotypically female. " https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222286/#:~:text=During early development the gonads,same and are phenotypically female. so at some point of our life, we were all female. then we differentiated to either Female or Male "The male and female human fetal external genitalia start out at the indifferent stage (8–9 weeks' gestation) and grow differentially into a penis or clitoris, which are fully formed by 17–18 weeks gestation " https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6234077/#:~:text=The male and female human fetal external genitalia start out,gestation) (Figure 8A). It is theorized that at that period the the body differentiated into either male or female but the brain did not, " t is believed that during the intrauterine period the fetal brain develops in the male direction through a direct action of testosterone on the developing nerve cells, or in the female direction through the absence of this hormone surge." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21094885/#:~:text=It is believed that during,absence of this hormone surge. This is a very cursory explanation allowed with thin the limitations of this forum. I ams sure you don't want to read a 50 page abstract. But I hope you got the point i am trying to make. Simply having a penis does not make you a man or a woman. I realise that there are certain limitations to a Transexual. such as sports competition, because even though she/ he might have the mind of a woman, he/she still has the body of a man, and having a physically stronger male body , compete in a female venue is simply unfair. The same applies to a female who tranced into a male , My daughter who is not trasexual but always very competative ( top athlete in multiple womens sports) on time told me she wanted to play football (American) she said the school team accepted girls, so I went to meet with the coach, daughter with me. I asked , "s it true you have girls in the team) he said "Yea , we had one last season" Oh great I replied " How did she do" "She got hurt he said." I never applied any limitations in my daughter, I enabled her to pursue her dreams to the best of my ability. A really remarkable person working on her bar, and the top case manager at the second largest legal firm in Florida. (Proud Daddy ) But no way would have allowed her to get hurt. If I had my choice I would not allow a son to play american football. So even with in gender considerations there are limitations. I

I will look it up for you because that's just the kind of helpful guy I am. actually it os very easy to do. There is a function on the right left corner of the quote you are responding too That will take you to the quote that is responding to the previous quote In this case what you said. So let's look at what you actually said. "I wasn't aware that "trans" even existed in the 1930s. It certainly didn't in NZ when I grew up decades later ." "It certainly didn't in NZ", "didn't' meaning axist. I'm sure there were some of that attitude in society, but they kept their druthers to themselves. " Then you backpedal and say, "I'm sure there were some " from these two contradicting statements I am inclined to concluded that transexuals in NZ are like Schrodinger's Cat . "but they kept their to themselves. " Because their "druthers '' is a "preference " something that they had a choice, some times they prefered to be transexual, be ostracized from "Normal" society. And other times they did not. "Such was the invisibility of "trans" that some first became aware it existed when the Kinks' song Lola became popular in 1970. " And that my friend is the definition of a compromised life. To be invisible, keep your head down , don't be an Uppity <deleted>. Apologies to my black friends I am sure you recognise the reference.

again Not towards them. Why you like foreigners acting supperior to you? When you stop laughing , I will explain it to you What is pathetic is me trying to talk logic with you

Not at all , we are not talking about Thais we are talking about Farangs who want to become more Thai. Do you agree that people do not like those who act supperior to them? If you do and you want to be liked . then don't do it. The Op wants , (at least fakes that he wants). to accepted by Thais and assimilate. Well if that's true then he can't act supperior to them. The fact that Thais feel supperior to others in immaterial. In fact if what you say about Thais is true, the OP would score points with Thais if he also thought that Thais are supperior to others and showed it.

two wrongs never made a right

I am reminded of the claim that there are no gays in Iran. All these exual deviations always existed,and everywhere. they are part of being human. It is just that in some places and as some times it was suppressed and swept under the rug. Forcing people to be something they are not is IMO the worst crime against humanity.

absolutely right It is renewable, but certainly not "green" all you have to do is look out your window to see the effects of sugarcane farming.

He might be better off if he sat down.

Why are you now a worse Thai person? To do that you need to understand it more. you will never become 100% Thai . Imposible . Understand the culture, dot feel supperior , only different. There is no such thing as a supperior culture. Some cultures are better at some things and worse in others. and other cultures are better at other things and worse and better than other . A superiority complex that many expats seem to have is simply Ethnocentrism. This superiority complex of expats manifests its self in many small ways and some big, and Thais know it. No one like a better than thou person. Thai culture is what works with in the different dynamics of this society Same as your culture back home , and is dynamic. As conditions change so does culture adjusts to compensate. You certainly should. please take pictures and post , we all need a good laugh. why don't you now? Anything you study makes you a better person. But if I was you, I would start by studying myself, if you do it honestly you might be surprised what you will find. "An unexamined life is not worth living" it is simply a waste of time and skin." You did not think I could improve on Socrates? did you? well how do you like them apples?

Foxes are smart, they would never fall for it,

Sorry my stupidity offended you I will try not to bother you with it. By the way it was a very good question that you would not answer because if you did it would lead you to the inevitable conclusion. And my mom always said you can lead a donkey to water but you can not make him drink, In the deficit issue, which it was you who decided to interject yours in, Based on the fact Biden has been much better.

Not sure why you need to call what I said nonsense, and not only nonsense but I am spouting them It is bad enough to be talking nonsense, but to be "spouting" them? I must have reached a new low. So let's talk nonsense. Did you or did you not say "Are you claiming that Biden didn't "boast about running up the deficit? " To which I replied , trump run up a much bigger deficit. decided to make an equivalency argument . that they are both the same. I showed you that they were not the same and that the person you supported was much much worst and that . at least on the deficit subject I would chose the one that did the least harm. and then you tried to deflect , and on and on So obviously you cared enough about the subject to insert yourself in a conversation about the deficit as it relates to Biden and trump is it possible that the enemy of your enemy is a worst enemy? or are you saying that your enemy is the US. and you support anyone who will destroy it? Could you please define me what "Woke" means to you again not a very smart reply. Because , trump is 77 years old, , no spring chicken. so the age thing applies to both. So I get it . you don't like Harris. and you are afraid that if Biden died, Harris will become president. So let me ask you this? what would happen if trump died? Do you know who his VP would be? how do you know if his VP would be any better? Talk about nonsense!

Thank you for your concern. Your advice is noted and will be given the attention it deserves. Ahh, so you are saying a president can not go to jail regardless of what he does. Interesting .

Inserection is a catch all term and can be accomplished in different unlawful ways by different people. A leader can instigate an Interbeton, and his followers comite different criminal acts to carry out the inserection those people were charged with the criminal acts they commited , Most were charged with braking and entering, some with attempted murder , others with impeding a law Office from doing his job etc. The list is long . I am trying to phrase this as politely as I can but only someone with avery poor understanding of the issue would buy the assertion that they should had been charged with inserection. I am not going to litigate the case with you. The cases were already litigated, a jury of their peers heard the facts and found them guilty. Then perhaps you should be staying out of these discussions, Why don't you google it, Research it and when you know more, come back? You obviously heard it some place, so it must have been reported, unless you came upon this information by divine inspiration , why don't you provide a link to a report about it so that we might know what you are talking about and how it supports your assertions, as it is I have no idea what you are talking about. or how it relates with what we are talking about.

I am reminded of the story of the snake and the otter at the river. The snake asked the otter for a ride across the river on the otters back to which the otter asks " are you crazy. you will bite me and I will die" the snake replies " no I will never do that because if I do we i will sink and we will both die. Ok agrees the otter. "this makes sense. hop on. " in the middle of the river the snake bites the otter , and as they are both drowning the otter asks. "Why did I do this? now we will both die" to which the snake replied "its my nature, as much as I tried, I could not go against my nature " Perhaps in that story is your answer.