- Popular Post
-
Posts
3,051 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Posts posted by MikeandDow
-
-
12 minutes ago, fondue zoo said:
Anyone else hear that they've evacuated the above ground floors of the Chaeng Watthana Government Complex in Bangkok in the last 30 minutes?
Sinking and or leaning.
UPDATE
The cracks and tilt were present before the quake, everyone back to work. You do you Thailand.
https://world.thaipbs.or.th/detail/evacuation-at-government-complex-as-building-shakes/57048
-
5 minutes ago, Yagoda said:
So blatantly photoshopped its pathetic. Where do you get that? Source?
I depise the Chinese but hate even more folks who screw up our fight with BS
think you are wrong go look other news you will see same columns
https://world.thaipbs.or.th/detail/contract-for-state-audit-office-construction-under-scrutiny/57041
-
2
-
-
14 minutes ago, TorquayFan said:
Gott - it would be amazing if the concrete supports did not have reinforcement steel as usual ! Quite unbelievable !
Armoured steel ? Never heard of it, except in military applications.
IMO, unlikely that the concrete was below spec.
We'll see . . . .
Why would u say its unlikely the concrete below spec ?? it would be one of the main reasons along with the reo, if you look at the picture on other post you will see lots of reo but unkown if meets spec
dont think the public will ever find out the reasons big cover up as normal
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Slowly leaking out , Industry Minister Ekanat Promphan, after inspecting steel samples collected from the construction site, refrained from making accusations but commented, “Just seeing it left me stunned.”
if a guy who is a politician can see this it must be bad !!
-
3
-
2
-
4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 minutes ago, Gecko123 said:"attempting to smuggle"..."the culprits"...
pretty strong language considering no one knows the motive for why the records were being moved. For all anyone knows at this point, they could have been protecting them from the elements, or making sure they were preserved in order to prove no wrongdoing on their part. Let the laugh emojis roll in, but it's true.
You can wake up now!!
-
4
-
1
-
1
-
14 minutes ago, Drumbuie said:
CREC has seven decades of experience of building railways, smoothing gradients, tracklaying etc - but no experience of building high rises.
Contracting them was a bit like asking a bus driver to tailor your suit.
CREC was the company whose railway tunnel collapsed last year in Nakhon Ratchasima. Some of their officials were caught yesterday trying to remove files from the Audit building site.
What iam reading from the news is that some of the documents were requests for Inspections, normally you dont request Inspections, what i think is the wrong terminology has been used here, my bet is the documents were NCR reports ( non comformace reports ) which are used to list defects found and to be addressed by the contractor
The question has to be asked Why was CREC even on a tender list for the project if it did not have no experience of building high rises
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, dinsdale said:Cover up by CCP and Thai officials. Obviously there was sub-standard construction quality. Big kickbacks involved with this one.
But ! But! this project was supposed to be a star! No coruption on the project !
-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
What is amazing is how did they get this design approved ?? did anybody do due diligence on this !!
-
1
-
2
-
2
-
6 minutes ago, HampiK said:
So far I know, all building higher than 15 meters had to be build earthquake proof since 2007.
In 2021 it was increased to build more safe.
So a Building from 2022 (Which is taller than 15m) has to be earthquake proove. Or in that case should have.
My room has 2 cracks in the gypsum and unfortunatelly 1 50cm crack over a door frame at a inner wall. Else I can't find any cracks. But yes, there are other rooms which showed more cracks inside the rooms.But to be honest as I never encountered anything similar to this event before it was really horrifying and I hope I never have to encounter something like that again. I also not knew before if the buildings were even likely build earthquake resistant or not!
You did not answer the question ( as far as you know ) There should be approval cert or paperwork attesting to the fact ?? but the problem is how do you know ! answer you dont know !! coruption is rife in thailand its easy to get approval when the baht is king!
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Tropicalevo said:The consortium that won the bid were instructed by the government to reduce the initial quote by some 258 million baht.
(According to a previous report here on AN.)
I'd wager that the savings were not made by reducing director's salaries or the amounts in the brown envelopes.
It will be savings by reducing quantity/quality of the raw materials.
You buy cheap you get cheap !
-
1
-
9
-
3
-
1
-
- Popular Post
Think every one knows the answer ?? but will it see light of day No,! swept under the carpet, will be forgotten next news cycle, You buy cheap you get cheap!!
-
2
-
7
-
1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
-
TAT Quality Tourist,
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, josephbloggs said:
Yes, apart from the second picture which looks bad. I have always said we need to see which buildings fare well and which don't - there are bound to be bad performers. We will know after all inspections, but on the face of it this one did badly - whether that is a support column for the building or not I don't know. Do you know?
I'll spell it out again: Bangkok did well as a whole. One building collapsed. One. Out of the thousands of high rises one collpased and it was still under construction. I am sure there will be some that will be condemned, but I think not many. Whether the one above will be one or not I don't know.
But people posting ceiling tiles, wall tiles, superficial cracks and crying foul against the whole industry are nothing more than bashers. As if "earthquake resistance" should mean no cracks or wobbly false ceilings.
If you think Bangkok did well !! go tell it to the familys of the dead!!
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
4 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:
Ha ha ha ha! You're a quality manager for the construction industry, of course you are! That is why you have posted nothing but nonsense in all these threads.
You have never seen a building code that allows for superficial cracks after a moderate earthquake? Really? Tell me what does DPT1301/1302-61allow for after an earthquake? What level of damage does it say is reasonable? It is there to maintain structural integrity after a quake, not to protect paintwork and ceiling tiles.
You are a funny man Mr Quality Manager.
That is a Thai standard and i dont work here in the Thai construction Industry thank god ! more in a western style industry were they have safety and quality and now you are changing its superficial cracks instead of cracks you need to be more specific when posting
-
1
-
2
-
1 minute ago, Nick Carter icp said:
False ceilings moving isn't a problem , neither are cracks in the walls.
The problems arise when the structure is compromised and the building may collapse
cracks in walls need to be Inspected to determin the extent, are the wall load bearing ?? by saying they do not matter can only be determined by a structural engineer and you are not that !
-
2
-
-
- Popular Post
40 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:
I wish people would stop posting these kind of things. Ceiling panels and wall surface cracks are absolutely to be expected and are accommodated under the latest building code.
If the condo is taking extra precaution until there's a full inspection then good for them - none of those look structural to me.
My kids' school evacuated on Friday. Nobody has been allowed back in since - all belongings are still there - until they can have an official inspection and sign off even though there is no visible damage other than superficial. School is closed tomorrow while the inspections happen. I applaud them for their diligence.
Ceiling panels, tiles falling off, or wall cracks are not serious issues. Those buildings took a huge jolting! Where do you draw the line? Is wallpaper peeling allowed? Doors needing realigning?
I'm not saying there are not shabby buildings in Bangkok that will be in trouble, but none of those pics look like it to me, so what is the point of posting?Its called a Forum people post there opinions it maybe in your opinion Ceiling panels, tiles falling off, or wall cracks are not serious issues. but if you are not a strucural engineer thats all it is your opnion
cracks are absolutely to be expected and are accommodated under the latest building code.
I am a Quality manager for the construction Industry and I have never seen a building code that allows cracks i think i would have to call that BS
-
2
-
2
-
Welcome change !! just now have to police the change,
-
1
-
-
43 minutes ago, stevenl said:
Example of your thai bashing. Many more in this and other threads.
If you think that telling the truth is Thai bashing and stating facts and you are Uncomfortable with that tooo bad
stop trying to be a mod !! move on
-
2
-
-
26 minutes ago, Mike k said:
That space can be used for Hvac duct work, wiring, plumbing and sprinkler systems
That is correct interstitial space is used for that, but they were building a table top design no steel beams required it is a well know fact that table top design is not quake proof, its very unstable its isimilar in design as the twin towers without the center steel core, the question that should be asked is who approved this design as the building code requires quake proof buildings after 2021 and table top design is not quake proof.
The whole Project was doomed from the start the contractor who won the bid ITD-CREC was the cheapest therefore can be reasonable assumed cheap materials to be used,
contractor ITD-CREC not very successful in completing projects on time, Safety and quality very poor, have several disaster already, very courpt company, it is obvious no due diligence was carred out in awarding this project to this company not only is the contractor resonsible for this disaster, the Thai goverment has to bear some responsibility for awarding the contract without due diligence.
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, jacnl2000 said:
Agree with previous poster. Given that the China Railway Engineering Corporation (CREC) with a history spanning over seven decades has worked in earthquake-prone regions before, it’s expected that they would have experience in implementing earthquake-resistant designs, including a comprehensive understanding of constructing on soft clay substrates, utilizing various ground improvement methods to ensure structural integrity.
Sad that the current situation unfortunately cannot be undone, but that doesn't mean we can no longer share nice moments with each other in Bangkok's highest tower. My apologies to Oliver Zipse for covering his BMW X7—guess even a luxury SUV needs a little privacy sometimes.
A picture of shaky buildings perched on a wobbly jelly cake, topped with cherries, is far from reassuring. Concept of unforeseen seismic activity might be introduced—when the intensity or characteristics of an earthquake exceeds previous expectations or building standards. It was an exceptional heavy one shaking up the design book.
Well why?? this so called expert company! building a Table top design building, when a table top design is well know not for unstable soils and not earthquake proof !! its because Its Cheap !!!
-
13 minutes ago, scubascuba3 said:
Apparently all buildings completed from 2007 are earthquake proof
A better word is Unknown the almight baht can buy u anything untill All the buildings are Inspected to the relvent codes it is Unknown
-
7 minutes ago, lordgrinz said:
So, the BBC says this was a "flat slab" design, "which is no longer recommended in earthquake-prone areas". Pretty close to the same idea for the World Trade center buildings, to maximize open floor space by removing inner support beams.
Yes read the same, guess the guy who approved the design should be a bit worried !!
-
1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:
So no then, as expected.
Just rant, shout and Thai bash - your modus operandi.how is my post thai bashing, telling you to read the news, sorry if you are dislextic you need to medicate
-
1
-
1
-
Chinese Men Caught Removing Documents from Collapsed Building in Bangkok
in Thailand News
Posted
Cement Grade
Compressive Strength (After 28 Days)
Applications
Key Features
33 Grade
33 MPa
Plastering, masonry work, low-strength concrete
- Suitable for non-load-bearing structures
- Economical for basic projects
- Less commonly used today
43 Grade
43 MPa
Residential buildings, precast concrete
- Versatile for medium-load structures
- Commonly used in residential and commercial projects
53 Grade
53 MPa
High-rise buildings, bridges, heavy structures
- Ideal for heavy-load and high
-rise structures
- Gains strength rapidly - Requires careful curing
Grade 53 should have been used I do not know what the project spec calls for
the thing i can tell you the chinse are in the dark ages when it comes to curing cement they still use bedding straw insted of a curing agent, any how the cost difference between grade 53 and say grade 33 is substantial, once cured the strength can easly measured using a glegg hammer