nauseus

The graph title says 'promotional spending' - it does not say spending to control the climate change conversation. After 2015, oil prices and revenues dropped like stones, so your 200 million/year after that is just plain guesswork.

An important note attached to but not revealed next to your epa's beautiful pie: Carbon dioxide (CO2): Fossil fuel use is the primary source of CO2. CO2 can also be emitted from direct human-induced impacts on forestry and other land use, such as through deforestation, land clearing for agriculture, and degradation of soils. Likewise, land can also remove CO2 from the atmosphere through reforestation, improvement of soils, and other activities.

That I replied to a post mentioning this supposed 4 million years does not mean that I agree with that number. I was not replying to you anyway and your "explicitly referred" line is just more nonsense. Furthermore, while a ship may be able to navigate across previously impassable regions within the polar circles, that does not necessarily mean that the entire polar region will be ice-free.

I didn't say 4 million years ago. Nothing to do with shipping and I was not talking about threats. Why not try and sell gibberish this somewhere else?

It doesn't matter does it? "Unprecedented" means never done/known of before and in this case that is wrong.

This "unprecedented" claim is false. The poles have been ice-free before. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18949-the-history-of-ice-on-earth/

Good luck.

You said "Ukraine. Interest on Trump debt". Now you say that Trump’s 2017 tax cut and the lack of any serious spending restraint helped both the deficit and the debt soar, but don't mention Covid, or Biden's total lack of spending restraint at all. Away with you, varlet.

Because you assign all debt to Trump and total Ukraine funding is still less than 100 billion.

You keep making false claims.

by all accounts ????

In the BBC now: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-europe-65818715

Eh?

What you don't include is the fact that in China the amount of power provided by coal is still increasing.

Yes. It's Bean not Been.

Right. Is that why the uncomfortable truth is that Joe is so very popular right now. Not. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/biden-approval-rating/

Looks like "most of us" haven't seen the polls! Topic is about Joe - not FDR - no comparison in any way.

Just a scorned RINO. She'd have to flip to get any votes at all.

For luck?

Let's hope he doesn't make a nasty mess trying.

Like the hairs on his legs?

I didn't see snow in the forecast.

Are you fit for the job? Watch me! Well we did and so the answer everyone really knows is confirmed.

and a few slips along the way...

PULL! BANG! Where's that damn dog??