nauseus

By some...

The observation?

I think that the real "evidence" would be good to see but I guess that is unlikely to happen. However, if Iran is truly building a bomb then is it worth the risk of countering that possibility with inaction?

The claim that prompted me to cite the RAF was this : Wars have never been won by creating no-fly zones, having air superiority due to 'modern air power' or obliterating countries with bombs and drones alone. A direct result of the Battle of Britain being effectively won by the RAF, was that Hitler abandoned his plan to invade. Instead he sent his armies east. After initial success against Russia, the German axis was stopped before Moscow, then slowly ground down around Stalingrad, and by early 1943 it was depleted so much that retreat was the only option. The Germans never really recovered after that and with the USA now involved, they were done. So, in this case I would say that the war was won due to the RAF victory domino, because if Germany had occupied the UK, then the British would not have been able to fight in North Africa and Americans would not have had the UK to use as a staging post to use as a launch pad to send their army into continental Europe.

Yes they have. The precedent was set in 1940 by the RAF.

From the link below I guess that there are monitoring authorities ... and monitoring authorities. It must, at least, be possible that Iran blindfolded the IAEA by strictly limiting where it could inspect. https://www.hudson.org/national-security-defense/seven-myths-about-the-iran-nuclear-deal

MA4GA

An exciting life indeed.

Sounds like a terrible experience.

No idea what that mean?

How about Beer Time?

The statement is false as is your claim. Greenwich is presently on GMT. BST starts on Sunday in Greenwich and the rest of the UK. Better alert GG.

Starmer seems to blame all shortcomings on previous governments - well if that was true and known they've had at least enough time to organize enough money and effort to remedy to ready a couple of destroyers! The defence investment plan was nearing completion? What happened? Did they stop work on that too? Starmer can't even accept responsibility for sending Mandelson to Washington!

Nah. Just a show-off bore.

The US took in over 100,000 Jewish refugees during the war years. While it should have been more, other countries were reluctant to take any.

Typical diversionary blame-game rubbish spoken by tea lady Rachel, from Accounts .

Terrible. Poor bugger. RIP.

Why should I go back and read more BS?

You realized you messed up when you suddenly introduced Korea and Japan as exceptions. There are more than that but I refuse to be lured into your bait bin.

Never herd of it.

Not to worry. I would start a training scheme.

It's more of an opinion. And I'm sticking with it. You are the expert at baselessness, while never properly explaining or demsntrating anything yourself.

I think that you are wrong about the level of homogeneity in "most Asian countries".

Well you started it!

I think that's enough "reading" for today.