nauseus

I'm talking about the timing of availability - not any possible dangers from these vaccinations. 'Highly respected' websites deserve that label if they demonstrate who they are and what they do.

Can't be Joe's fault can it? After all, he said so himself.

No it was not but anyway I was talking about the trend, as I described.

Rising trend since end 2020. Price doubled since Jan 2021. https://www.investing.com/commodities/crude-oil

Thought you would say one for her and one for the wife!

You sure that's all? ????

Why not? They wouldn't let him be on the committee in the first place.

The "suggest" word comes up again in both of these "reports" and your linked sites don't explain who they actually are. But the point is that the vaccines were broadly available during Biden's term but not so for Trump.

Disagree - I think he was so busy on day one he's been exhausted since then: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/01/20/fact-sheet-president-elect-bidens-day-one-executive-actions-deliver-relief-for-families-across-america-amid-converging-crises/ As far as deaths go, I think that the vaccine availability gave Biden a much better chance of keeping the numbers down. Recent waves (4 and 5) were almost as bad as 3 and there is no excuse for those.

Only had to read the first para before the blame Trump game started. Sound just like Joe now.

What facts - like your Covid ones? ???? Illogical captain.

1. From outbreak to now. Biden in power for 58% of that - same ratio but vax effect only really assisting Americans after Biden got in. 2. Irrelevant.

If you actually read the post I was replying to, instead of just rudely interjecting, then you might find the sense that you seek.

Actually it is one of my many strong suits. Do you have any, at all?

Thanks for that.

Fine. New topic then.

Could I "suggest" that suggestions don't work well.

Oops, 58% of that one million have died during the present administration, even after it inherited the vaccines that did not start to become available until November 2020.

Sounds like that is exactly how they are treating it though, eh?

If this is to be a true hearing, rather than an outright prosecution, for a semblance if balance if course. Pelosi & Co are certainly not Trump fans are they?

I'm already out of shape! Looked at links but neither matches what I understood which was that the Republicans wanted to nominate their own people, plus broaden the scope of the hearing. No agreement about this, so Pelosi Inc formed their own committee with 7 Dems and 2 RINOS. The big problem with that is that there will be no cross-examination and witness/testimony selection to give any kind of balance.

sun and eggs work - sunny side up?

Got a good link for that?

The ratings today are relevant to the conversation I was having with someone else. I didn't mention poll results. Try your luck at the next beat.

Your point of view but, looking at all approval polls, that view is not shared by the majority of Americans.