nauseus

Just keeping up-to-date with the recent Dem tactic of word juggling. Real lame nonsense.

Ah, I see you latched onto BBK B's post now. The GOP said that the transcript is not not ready for release - if it's not final then it doesn't formally exist - Raskin has to accept that. I'm sure the GOP won't rush to help him now.

Well I just pasted in Democrats claim the GOP is withholding evidence contradicting claims in Hunter Biden probe and searched it again. The original link (AP) is still top but nothing from MSNBC, NYT and the rest of the MSM group as they are generally accepted to be. So your "all over" description seems all wrong.

I didn't claim that at all. Talk about making things up!

Maybe it doesn't even exist? This story is not pushed by most msm.

No. You used the bias word. Not me.

Just for him? Right.

There were two links. A pity that you cannot cite properly. Even so there are several series of incrementing numbers in the court text thing. Very confusing. Ridiculous back.

Why insert all the numbers? That just makes it more ridiculous.

Well make your mind up!

Yes, so far, that is what it is.

The obstruction now alleged by the IRS WB's. More on the way. We must be patient.

What is laughable is the notion that a misbehaving DOJ would necessarily stop that behaviour under a new president. This alleged obstruction apparently started under Obama, in any case, with Joe Biden as VP.

You just used the word bias three times when it was not used in the order for the investigation. This is what it said: The Special Counsel is authorized to investigate whether any federal official, employee, or any other person or entity violated the law in connection with the intelligence, counter-intelligence, or law-enforcement activities directed at the 2016 presidential campaigns, individuals associated with those campaigns, and individuals associated with the administration of President Donald J. Trump, including but not limited to Crossfire Hurricane and the investigation of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller, III. This was not specific to any "bias" that may have been held by the DOJ. The main complaints were against the FBI. But carry on making things up. Happy Hour soon. TGIF.

I remember it but you seem to miss the point of it, which was to investigate allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 election and any links between Donald Trump and Moscow. Not very relevant here at all and was critical of the FBI more than anything else.

He didn't say that.

Never mind no there there or no here here. You continually ignore the probability that the "grounds" have been slow to emerge due to obstruction, slow-walking and lack of action by the DOJ, whether under Trump or Biden.

Or......they thought they would bundle up all the charges together in return for immunity from anything else that might come up.

A bit like the responses from the DOJ, FBI, DHS and the WH press secretary. Yah? ????

Because obstruction and slow walking are the likely reasons why evidence is lacking.

A DOJ change of tack with less obstruction and slow-walking.

He was just restating what he had said already. Of course, Politico create a headline to try and say something different.

Yet.

No. It doesn't and I didn't. However what I did say is this: The WB claims concern alleged suspicious transfers from at least five foreign countries to various shell companies that Hunter Biden is allegedly involved in, with other Biden family members also likely to be implicated. Who was president, when, does not change anything. If Joe Biden is involved then the highest rank he would have had would have been VP. We will have to wait and see.

That seems to be the DOJ and FBI ploy.