kevozman1

Western Leftists are more than delusional. In an actual civilized society they would be paraded to the town square where poles, ropes and whips had been placed, and after an day's worth of action a more wholesome society could continue to operate.

Just a low IQ list compiled by some herp derp cretins, nothing to see here. Especially Geneva and Amsterdam. I am sure those highly visited cities rank alongside others in the world where kidnapping and being deleted is common.

Ridiculous. Replication is the biggest form of flattery anyway. No to mention aren't a lot of people in that region heavily linked with Khmer people?

15 hours ago, WDSmart said:

Yes, in my book, I propose a one-woman, one-child policy. But even if persistently implemented, it would take about 360 years to reduce the human population to about 10% of what it is now. I think such a population size could exist on Earth, employing all our technology to provide everyone with a "comfortable" lifestyle. But, I don't think we have that long, so even that will not work.

In my book, I say we are already "over the cliff" on this degradation of the Earth, and even if we were to try to reduce our pollution and destruction, which we've shown no intention of doing, we will not succeed in preventing the eventual and now inevitable extinction of most of Earth's lifeforms, including, hopefully, our own. 

If you truly believe that last sentence then you can do the right thing by reducing the burden on earth by one.

I have to say when I have stayed in Thai family areas (outside of tourist/expat places) my experiences have been overwhelmingly positive. Everyday Thai people are good and it's comfortable to live around them because they have a good balance between keeping peace and letting people live their life. Just take other societies in Asia, Japan would be hell for me with the highly restrictive way of living, but somewhere like the Philippines is too chaotic. Thailand gets it about right. I probably would have had serious issues if I spent more time in the tourist ghettos. I just don't like a lot of the Thais who work around tourists, their attitude, and Thais are masters at reading body language, eventually the friction would boil over and I am not a cowardly character so it wouldn't end up well (mostly for me I would imagine).

Your avatar is a of a dog breed known for having respiratory issues wearing a mask. We already know you leftists are not good people but hey this is the internet, but just behave yourselves in the few hours during the week you leave your apartments to go to your local Starbucks. Some of us have lost our patience with your type.

Another reason why Thailand is going to become a dated society. Going forward when people start to become more selective on travel destinations, and it's already happening, less people are going to see a society where attacks on mothers, old men and foreigners is somewhat accepted as an appealing destination. They need to start getting the ropes and whips out and teaching these boys a lesson, or the country will be reduced to just being BKK as a hub of transport to safer and better places. 

Mostly it's about replacement/setting up a caste system. Western countries have placed half of their industry in Asia (mostly China) between 1980-2010. What has happened in places that 'require' foreign workers is that the existing population don't want to work around a bunch of desperado browns and blacks who are only there to send money home to their lame family in Nigeria, India or the Philippines, so they sold up and moved to rural areas, took early retirement, went on welfare, or moved abroad. That's the reality. People can spin whatever fictional tales about it if they want.

5 hours ago, zz4096 said:

 

Where did all these pussies come from? I'm starting to think they're putting something in the water.

Yes a lot of it is due to diet I believe, and why do the people running the show want a mass of pussies/cretins? Easy to control. It's what Modern Liberalism was about from its inception in the mid-60's in the West, I could see how people fell for it back then + 3-4 decades of things being fun and positive. If people haven't started to see what's going on especially in the last decade and piece things together then you're a zombie. For those paying attention, there are probably another 2-3 decades of this crap in the West, and it's already in other regions at lower stages.

Most politicians are not that great actors, and usually not that good looking either. If they are good actors and good looking then they could get the Tom, Cruise or Brad Pitt type gigs instead of Hollywood for ugly people (the politic charade) to entertain grown children/Peter Pans.

14 hours ago, wavodavo said:

Hey everybody Boby Boy Smith is back again WOW !!

Excuse me?

I get the feeling we wouldn't agree on much, but I agree with you on this one. The way it's so open in Thailand has never sat well with me along with the full-moon party degeneracy. As for the demographics? Well if a large amount of South Asians and/or Sub Saharans turn up somewhere in numbers then 9/10 it's a wrap for that place. An ancient Hebrew saying goes, and i'm paraphrasing: 'Always bring in the Ku<deleted>es to <deleted> up the <deleted>able'.

8 hours ago, transam said:

Yes he did, but most of his pretending to be a tough dictator has backfired, about turns in abundance....🤔

Crazy stuff for a President of the USA, embarrassing too........😬

You are correct in saying 'pretending' as he is an actor. All of these politicians are. I call it Hollywood for ugly folk. If Trump was a bit better looking and a bit of a better actor he could have got the Tom Cruise/Brad Pitt type gig, but anyway don't let any of that bamboozle you from the reality that Modern Liberalism is still in full swing in the West and nothing much has changed.

14 hours ago, ronnie50 said:

No. The American police were the first in the democratised world to become militarized. More Americans in prison per capita than any other country - many for petty offenses. The US is basically a police state and has been for 20-30 years now. It's true police in other western countries have followed that path unfortunately. But they haven't privatized their prisons to make it profitable to jail as many as possible.

I just looked up incarceration per capita and the US isn't the highest, but it's right up there towards the top to be fair.  The US could look into other forms of punishment such as reintroducing the bullwhip or cat o'nine tails along with a reintroduction of Christian morality (not the cucked out modern version) or Islamic morality. The whole West needs it, but some of the States in the US are resembling Sodom and Gomorrah at this point. At least in places such as Thailand they keep the degeneracy to pockets and the overall society isn't too degraded.

24 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

One should be careful with such comparisons. India has 1.4+ billion people. Because of its sheer size, it has a population of wealthy and financially well off people that is far larger than the total population of Thailand. It has approx. 165 billionaires (USD) and tens of millions of people with more money than brains. Much of the Indian population may still be living in poverty worse than that of Thailand's, but they are not the people who visit Thailand. It is the nouveau riche aggressive and rude Indians who visit. Thailand is relatively inexpensive, and has a culture that is less difficult than western cultures.  The high end Indians who studied in the west, and worked in the west typically have more refined  preferences than visiting Pattaya.

I am not even talking about just the ones in poverty.. I mentioned the average because it puts things in perspective for the public at large - the vast majority of them are broke compared to Westerners. There may well be 1.4billion Indians, but there are what.. a billion Westerners probably (?) And way more millionaires and billionaires (who like to meet up with the rest of international 1% who do not congregate in Thailand). 

Moreover, for an Indian to visit Thailand doesn't mean they need much money at all by any standard. They get a visa on arrival, can get a 3-4 hour flight for probably 100-200USD, stay in the crappiest 400baht a night guesthouse for a few days, get a couple of beers at 7/11, and honestly judging by most of the Indians I see visiting Thailand that's the gist I get. It's like when you see a European backpacker with dreadlocks and those elephant pajama bottoms they like to wear, you know they are slumming it, I kinda put Indians and those guys in the same bracket. So sorry but that is what I see.

46 minutes ago, JackGats said:

As though you didn't know that the emphasis was on Indians in Thailand, not on Indians in the slums of Calcutta. Indians are now big spenders in Thailand.

The international 1% don't really come to Thailand, and outside of that 16kUSD puts someone in the top 5% of Indian salaries. That's peanuts for a Westerner. Also in my journeys around Thailand I am not seeing evidence of these Indians in Thailand whether BKK, North Thailand, or along the western seaboard, but you know what maybe they have started to go to Pattaya in the last 8 years since I was last there. Not sure it aligns with what people have told me but hey, I don't know.

12 minutes ago, zz4096 said:

No I don't, it's racist. I went to that stadium on Rama IV about 28 years ago, Ratchasomething. I went to the ticket booth and saw a sign in Thai with the numbers in Thai script. 200 baht. So I handed them 2 reds but they refused to take them.

 

Told me to fk off and go to another ticket office where the price was 1,000 baht. I was a backpacker with limited funds, not a two week millionare. That would feed me for a week. They can shove their Muay Thai where the sun don't shine.

Although I will say back then.. and I may be being a little generous here.. that they wanted to give you a VIP seat. The stands back then were quite wild in Muay Thai, and a random foreigner could get some problems. Thesedays it's much more docile.

4 minutes ago, zz4096 said:

No I don't, it's racist. I went to that stadium on Rama IV about 28 years ago, Ratchasomething. I went to the ticket booth and saw a sign in Thai with the numbers in Thai script. 200 baht. So I handed them 2 reds but they refused to take them.

 

Told me to fk off and go to another ticket office where the price was 1,000 baht. I was a backpacker with limited funds, not a two week millionare. That would feed me for a week. They can shove their Muay Thai where the sun don't shine.

Yes they are notoriously scammy at stadiums/events, happened to me years ago. It's a big reason why Muay Thai never took off, and now it's mostly known as something people incorporate into MMA gyms. Without trust people lose interest or don't invest, don't promote. It's the adage of most people in third world countries that they will take 1,000 dollars today rather than 10,000 in a year.

1 hour ago, JackGats said:

Farangs in denial. Flying half-way round the world to speak broken English with post-menopausal women in beer bars.

Unlike some other posters you may to used to having low IQ or emotional conversations with, that's not going to happen to me. You said 'Indians have WAY more money than 'Farangs'. Meanwhile the average salary in India is 300-400 USD, less than the average Thai. So instead of getting in your feelings like a like a little girl, explain your claim.  

7 hours ago, JackGats said:

You should know what is going on.

 

Indians have WAY more money now than Farangs. Even unemployed Indians do sex tourism in Thailand these days. 

 

Muslims? The crowds disgorged by flights from the Middle East outbid and outspend Farangs. So do Russians and sundry Asians. Those guys regularly pay up to 10 thousand Baht for short time.

 

Farangs invent stories of Indians gang-banging beach road girls for 800 baht a session, stories of Korean being popular because they're quick and small. Farangs are in denial.

Indians don't even have more money than Thai people. I wouldn't say you're in denial, perhaps delusional or low IQ or salty about Europeans?