rattlesnake

I definitely agree. This rejection seems to occur only in the context of Covid/vaccination refutation, which, in a way, is tacit admission that this is a taboo issue. I don't recall there being the same stringent requirement for other societal issues (e.g. nobody says one needs to be a firearms expert to formulate an opinion on gun control…).

Of course the measles didn't help, however we don't know what main factors led to this unfortunate outcome: she died of respiratory failure after having been given the wrong antibiotic, that much is certain. On a macro-level, three deaths is statistically insignificant and can't reasonably be used as a basis to draw conclusions and/or principles. I have no problem with my posts being seen as conspiratorial, but in this instance, it led to a misreading and erroneous conclusion. It isn't the sole reason for my stance, but it certainly didn't help… To be honest, I don't recall the details, I just know some doctors (not all of them) backed my sister in her decision to not give him any more jabs, and she managed to get the required paperwork, though it wasn't easy and as I said, she still is regularly "pushed" to reconsider. Well that's where my conspiratorial mind kicks in… The VAERS system is notoriously flawed and doesn't catch most injuries. In any case, the vaccine industry is worth hundreds of billions, can I imagine inconvenient stats being left aside? Yes, I certainly can. A 2025 study, 22 years after this one, will be welcome.

"Anyone", not "everyone". Her four siblings (not three, I made a mistake in my previous post) did not catch pneumonia – though she did – because of a multitude of factors which neither of us know. Portraying her pneumonia infection solely as a consequence of her unvaccinated status is the result, as pointed out previously, of a bias in favour of vaccination. You are reading and interpreting according to your predisposition to see my posts as conspiratorial. In this case, if you look at the paragraph I wrote, it is grammatically clear that "they" refers to the media: "Which brings us to a fundamental issue: why did the media claim this child died of measles? Because they are pushing a specific viewpoint. If they were pushing for the opposite viewpoint, they would give lots of visibility and credibility to studies such as the one below, which gives credence to the notion that measles spreads among vaccinated people." This is the point I was making: conversely to the above, if there was an endeavour to demonstrate the opposite stance, it would be done just as compellingly, with no shortage of material to support it. The video below presents a dissenting viewpoint. On a personal note, my own nephew (UK-based) was hospitalised in a critical condition after taking the MMR vaccine (causation acknowledged and vaccine exemption issued by the NHS, though my sister still gets regularly harassed with "encouragements" to jab him), so when Polly Tommey says you can die from it, I know she isn't kidding. RFK recently said “We don’t know the risks of many of these products, they’re not adequately safety-tested": is it really rational and reasonable to simply retort that he is nuts and that his current position is the result of some eccentric mishap? Could it not be that there is perhaps some truth in all this? If I was a pro-vaxxer, I would take a step back and give this some serious thought. MMR Vaccine Dangers-VEED.mp4

Her three siblings, whom it is reasonable to assume are also unvaccinated, also caught measles and recovered with no problem. This child caught pneumonia (which anybody can catch, regardless of any vaccination status) and died because of medical malpractice. She did not die of measles, unlike what the media have reported. Which brings us to a fundamental issue: why did the media claim this child died of measles? Because they are pushing a specific viewpoint. If they were pushing for the opposite viewpoint, they would give lots of visibility and credibility to studies such as the one below, which gives credence to the notion that measles spreads among vaccinated people. In the "Background" section, the first sentence is de facto an opinion, the second sentence is factual. Outbreak of measles among persons with prior evidence of immunity, New York City, 2011 Background: Measles was eliminated in the United States through high vaccination coverage and a public health system able to rapidly respond to measles. Measles may occur among vaccinated individuals, but secondary transmission from such individuals has not been documented. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24585562/

Here is an interesting take: Expert Medical Record Reviews Of The Two Girls In Texas Who Purportedly Died of Measles I have long reviewed medical records of patients harmed by poor medical care. Here, I present clear evidence of what actually caused the 2 girls deaths in Texas. It wasn't measles. Not by a long shot. https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/my-expert-review-of-the-medical-records?triedRedirect=true&sfnsn=mo

Here is a case study for you, Stiddle, and I am interested in knowing your take on it: When he was still a little boy (about four if I recall correctly), my son was hospitalised because of "the flu" (at least that is what they called it) which he caught at school. During his hospital stay, he passed it on to me and I spent the entire day in bed feeling terrible, typical "flu" symptoms (no energy, just getting up to walk two metres to go to the toilet was an epic quest, aching everywhere…). Anyway by the end of the day, we both felt fine again and went home (so my son had been ill for about 30 hours and I for about 10 hours). My question is, if the flu virus doesn't exist, what did we catch? The transmission factor is undeniable so it was definitely something.

I doubt it would be worthwhile or productive to continue this debate now. If RFK does what he has promised he would do, we can pick up this discussion in a few months. The MMR vaccine is particularly problematic. A CDC whistleblower leaked information to Steve Kirsch about the irrefutable link with autism (pasting the article below for the users who are interested), but this is just 'crazy conspiracy theory' of course… https://kirschsubstack.com/p/over-300-pages-of-evidence-from-the

There is no spike in measles, though there have always been sporadic outbreaks. There was one measles death between 2006 and 2015, and two between 2016 and 2025. This is a very weak case to make from a pro-vax viewpoint.

And that is the very inconvenient truth: unvaccinated people are in stellar health.

And the injected substance de facto enters the bloodstream regardless, as we are made of blood. It just isn't injected directly into the bloodstream because, supposedly, doing so would increase its chances of being destroyed. First up: unlike the layer of fat just under our skin, muscle has an excellent blood supply to help disperse the vaccine, says Joanna Groom, an immunology researcher at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute. […] A vaccine injected directly into the bloodstream, on the other hand, is vulnerable to destruction. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2021-01-08/covid-19-vaccine-injection-upper-arm-muscle-deltoid-immune/13031918

But anyone with a modicum of honesty will acknowledge that the substance of the message conveyed in that meme – regardless of what one ultimately concludes – raises an issue worth debating, because it is grounded in reality. And that is what memes are: a medium, or a tool, and as with all tools, what matters is who is wieding it and what the intent is. (I'm in my mid-40s and off the top of my head, I must have had about 4-5 vaccines when I was a kid and probably 4-5 boosters a few years later, so that's approximately 8-10 doses.)

Let's have a look at what the CDC says: 90 doses (of 17 different vaccines) in total for children. From birth to 6 months, I counted a minimum of 17 doses. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf

That would definitely be a positive development.

That's great, it won't be missed!

I find the confused emoji says "I am dumb" more than anything else, in most cases. Now that we have a couple of new ones, I wonder hom many hearts I am going to break.

Thanks for the reminder of the official cover story / sales pitch. I look forward to seeing the truth unfold.

Yes, that seems to be the consensus indeed.

He was talking about chlorine dioxide and he was right. The idiots are those who bleated the media's lies about it without checking the information independently.

Excellent stuff, will follow closely.

You should read the article. One of the benefits of actually acquainting oneself with a subject matter before speaking is that it precludes one from making gross comprehension mistakes. Red Phoenix is not complaining, he is saying this is good news.

Tenpenny supports Trump, so she would be on board.

My understanding is that it is leaving Thailand with the expired Thai passport which can be problematic. To be honest, I'm sure I could probably go to France (and back) using the expired passport, but I am not willing to risk encountering an overzealous airline staff member and/or IO and miss my flight…