rattlesnake

Shout-out to Andrew Bridgen, who will be remembered as the hero he is… hopefully in his lifetime.

That immediately reminded me of Terminator 2. "I need your clothes, your boots… and your vaccine passport."

The notion that "inflammation is the culprit" is shared by many and most probably correct. Therefore, a transparent and independent assessment of the recent dramatic increase in heart attacks should take into account all potential inflammatory factors. According to a September 2022 study (see below) by Cedars Sinai hospital in Los Angeles, heart attack deaths across all age groups have become more common in the U.S. since Covid, with a sharp increase in the 25-44 age bracket. Dr. Susan Cheng, a cardiologist at Cedars Sinai and co-author of the study, rightly stated that “Young people are obviously not really supposed to die of heart attack. They’re not really supposed to have heart attacks at all.” Covid infection is cited as one of the potential causes, which seems reasonable. Excess risk for acute myocardial infarction mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.28187 However, according to another peer-reviewed study published this month in Immunity, Inflammation and Disease, young adults who received a Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine showed elevated spike protein production a year or more after vaccination, which is significantly longer than the spike protein is said and expected to remain in the body. Participants exhibited elevated levels of multiple proinflammatory cytokines – the proteins which help regulate the immune system – signifying a persistent immune response to the messenger RNA. Altered Circulating Cytokine Profile Among mRNA-Vaccinated Young Adults: A Year-Long Follow-Up Study https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iid3.70194 This ties into a flurry of alarming medical research, which culminated recently with a call for a moratorium on the Covid shots following another peer-reviewed study citing “serious safety concerns” and potential long-term risks (see below), adding to the list of scientists and organizations that have supported halting the mRNA vaccines – including (among many others) Florida’s Surgeon General, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Doctors for Covid Ethics, Americans for Health Freedom and the World Council for Health: Pfizer/BioNTech’s COVID-19 modRNA Vaccines: Dangerous Genetic Mechanism of Action Released before Sufficient Preclinical Testing https://jpands.org/vol29no4/oldfield.pdf Now of course, if one chooses to refute and discredit the above, it is possible. Semantics, when used skillfully, can prove very effective in arguing just about any point, especially when one uses the reverse process of starting from the desired conclusion (e.g. "data shows vaccines are overwhelmingly safe") and building the argumentation from there. But I will make a couple of observations: 1. The fact that data still keeps appearing on the nefarious effects of the vaccine is not the result of an unfortunate mishap, nor rooted in some quirky social media-driven trend, nor the endeavour of discredited scientists motivated by non-scientific goals. No, the answer is much more straightforward: the reason why this isn't going away, three years after the end of the Covid crisis, is because there is something there. It's as simple as that. 2. It is easier than one thinks to let oneself be subjected to ideological denialism, a mindset through which one is so convinced one is right that rather than simply looking for the truth and taking data at face value, one adopts an 'upstream reasoning' process and embraces the conclusion before looking at the information, which can lead to major gaps in the dialectic process. I believe this could be what led you, in your above response, to go as far as citing dehydration as a possible reason for the spike in young cardiac deaths, without even leaving any space for the possibility that this could be at least partially caused by the vaccines.

Badass.

Incorrect, our ranks are growing fast, hence the threads such as (I am paraphrasing off the top of my head) "Conspiracy theorists, why so many and what can we do about them?" or "Why do people not follow science anymore?", etc. Anyone still pushing the controversial and unethical Covid jab is living in a dangerous and nefarious bubble. The medical profession has been seriously damaged these past five years, and it will take time to build back trust in it. Fortunately, there still are thousands of good physicians (those who were "discredited by the medical community" – a fancy synonym for "excommunicated").

Exactly.

Exactly. Their parents are criminals. I don't see a problem and it's not the US taxpayers' problem.

Indeed. "Peer-reviewed" ultimately just means a bunch a guys publicly took a cohesive stance. And in perhaps the most corrupt and influence-peddling systems ever to exist, well, let's say that stance is of limited relevance to say the least.

Point b) is erroneous, c.f. Suzanne Humphries and the demonstration that pesticides = "polio" symptoms.

Others here disagree with you and think we are a danger to society (a problem to which a final solution should ideally be implemented)…

It is definitely a systemic issue more than anything else.

Terrible situation the powers that be created for you and so many other people. The world cannot rest until justice has been served.

Looking forward to more AI-aided "debunks"

And the premium increases, along with convoluted messages to explain that they are basically going bust: too many claims. But I am sure a certain tall person in the city of angels will have "fact checks" to explain everything (phew!).

Hopefully indeed.

Often more for "specialists". I know a cardiologist in France. Time spent studying: 10 years… with often a lot of debt accumulated in the process, as banks lend to medical people more easily. By the time these doctors enter the professional realm, they are in their 30s, with high mortgages to pay and a decade of "systemic training" in the brain, which leads them to rely on higher authorities as a compass for their information on what is good or bad, with little to no personal initiative involved. This is usually combined with the social prestige and overconfidence of being "those who know". No system produces 'Good Germans' more effectively than the medical system as it exists today.

There is a borderline oxymoronic contradiction in the terms here: you claim adherence to McCullough's work stems from ignorance of the version given by institutionalised bodies. It is, in fact, the opposite: everbody knows the official information about him. Taking a step back nonetheless in order to assess facts independently, without being susceptible to influence peddling, is what "doing your own research" is. It stems from knowledge, not ignorance.

Were they healthy?

The (not so) subtle art of inversion… Here is the reality below (though some will argue with a straight face that this is Covid-related and that it would have been so much worse without the jabs). Why heart attacks are striking young people … It means that one in five heart attack patients are now younger than 40. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-14631987/Cardiologist-truth-young-people-heart-attacks.html

You know it is, that's why you said it. I recommend Peter McCullough's Spike protein detox programme (c.f. relavant thread).

Other self-explanatory credentials from outlets hardly anybody listens to anymore: - "Debunked" by factcheck.org - Called "a dangerous misinformation spreader killing Americans" by ABC News "experts" - "Discredited by the scientific community" according to Yahoo News

You should check out Suzanne Humphries' take on that, i.e. the pesticide connection. Also, what is your view on vax-induced polio?

You are making the big mistake of assuming I am religious (dichotomic thinking which flaws the premise and therefore the subsequent reasoning). I am not. I see dogma and intolerance in both religious and atheist types, though the latter are more prone to it in my experience.

As far as I am concerned, I would have no choice but to accept it, whether I liked it or not. The truth is the truth.

And some physicians who have been 'blacklisted' from the medical community – always 'for good reason' of course – should be invited at the table, if only to disprove what they are saying.