rattlesnake

Please explain this: Top Two MMR-Vaccinated States Lead in 2025 Measles Cases https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/top-two-mmr-vaccinated-states-lead

Ah, my apologies, the Owl and the Stiddle are sometimes mistaken for one another, as they share a couple of distinctive traits…

Thank you for your patience and willingness to stoop to these abyssal depths of mediocity and ignorance. I know several people who have unvaccinated children, i.e. they never received a single shot, and who are all in stellar health. How does that fit in with the statement "You're alive because of the vaccines you did get, not despite them. So yes, you’re a piggybacker and would be dead without past immunisation"?

Thank you for confirming we would die if you had it your way – you are not the only participant of this thread to have eugenic penchants towards the Dirty Parasitic Antivaxxers. However, there are two contradictory recurring statements on this forum regarding these weaker elements of society. So which one applies? Please choose one and be consistent. 1. We are "piggybackers" who are still alive because we benefit from the herd immunity the other responsible folk created, i.e. it is possible – albeit selfish and irresponsible – to be unvaccinated. 2. We would be dead if we had not been inoculated as children, i.e. it is not possible to be unvaccinated and failure to abide by this principle entails certain death. This is a fundamental contradiction which an enlightened, tertiary-educated mind can't tolerate, I am sure. Looking forward to the clarification.

Top bloke indeed and fit as a fiddle at an age where most people have a long list of ailments and associated medication. Whatever he's doing, he's doing right.

I found the recent episodes with Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Dr. Mary Talley Bowden to be very insightful indeed.

This is the most pro-foreigner government I have seen in my 15+ years here. Inundating the country with farangs.

I would be interested in seeing uptake statistics.

Would you mind expanding a little on that? Did you suffer adverse events, or do you have a reason to be wary? It is my understanding that these vaccines are safe and effective, and that smart, educated people follow the science and choose inoculation.

We are the weak elements of society. Lacessit thinks eugenics is the best approach to deal with us. What are your insights?

Just when I thought I couldn't be more in awe, you reveal your secret weapon and actually read my mind without me saying anything… I am checkmated (not that I have the skills to play chess, as you of course know, but I am merely trying to match your grandeur…).

Of course not, which is why frequenting people of your ilk is so insightful. Please continue posting your intelligent, educated insights for the greater good.

Buy you are here to explain them to me

I agree with your interpretation. Saying that vaccines are not properly studied after having previously stated they were is an admission of having lied, rather than failure. Nothing new from the pharmaceutical cartel, though. They did not fail in their endeavour, in fact they succeeded spectacularly. The good news is that proper studies are underway.

The paper is from NEJM, which a prominent pro-vaxxer of this forum has cited as a quality, reliable source in this very thread. If you guys actually put your money where your mouths are, you would read and assess it dispassionately, instead of coming up with increasingly convoluted (and quite frankly, amusing) reasons to preemptively dismiss it. As for media coverage (or lack thereof), you should definitely be asking yourself these critical questions. I'll let the Secretary of Health and Human Services explain it to you. Oh but wait, he's 'insane', isn't he? Can't watch that then, can we? Let's stick to typing "Are vaccines safe?" on Grok! "All the major institutions of our society have been captured by the (medical) industry. […] They advertise because they wanna control the content. If you look at Anderson Cooper or Lester Holt or Jake Tapper, their paycheck is being paid by the network but their salaries are actually coming from pharmaceutical companies, and they know that. And they know that they've got to toe the line and they've got the frighten us about infectious diseases. They've got to make us all comply with the pharmaceutical mandates, and they're not giving us real news. They're not asking the questions that they ought to be asking. There's no skepticism. And if you look at these new shows, like twenty years ago, they were saying, yeah, there are problems with vaccines or these other drugs. They will never do that today." kennedy big pharma controls media.mp4

Is that the same Pfizer which was fined $2.3 billion for marketing a drug with the intent to deceive and mislead the public? Just checking as it is my understanding we are into "reliable sources" on this forum. Pfizer Hit with Largest Criminal Fine in US History https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/pfizer-hit-with-largest-criminal-fine-in-us-history/

Just create an NEJM account and read Dr. Stanley Plotkin's paper, which reveals the critical failings of vaccine safety studies. Or have a look at this summary below. And as you are clearly a critical thinker, ask yourself why this paper is not covered by maintream media, taking into account the billions in fines the pharmaceutical industry has paid over the years for crimes ranging from misleading consumers to hiding data or influence peddling for their benefit.

Ask your fellow educated, science-abiding, high-IQ member @Lacessit if NEJM is a trustworthy outlet: I sympathise with your predicament. I appreciate just how daunting the prospect of assessing information independently must be for you. But I gently and respectfully urge you to give it a try. Just take baby steps at first.

Same conjecture and scientific qualifications as the ones you religiously follow when they say what you want to hear.

The critical thinkers who actually apply the scientific method understand the implications… and those who are trapped in a turmoil of ego-driven denial purposely don't.

The link is in the article I posted, but here you go. You need to create a free NEJM account to access the full paper: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2402379

“… prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes [and] follow-up durations” and that “there are not resources earmarked for postauthorization safety studies.”

Scientific data is increasingly indicating that the Covid shots actually impair the immune system. This should be of interest to you: A new study titled, Post-vaccination IgG4 and IgG2 class switch associates with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections, marks the seventh study to show an increased risk of infection after mRNA injection while also revealing the likely underlying mechanism behind this phenomenon […] These findings suggest a potential association between IgG4 induction by mRNA vaccination and a higher risk of breakthrough infection, warranting further investigation into vaccination strategies to ensure sustained protection. https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-study-covid-19-mrna-injections

This should be of interest to you: After decades of aggressively promoting vaccines of all kinds, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the world's leading vaccinologist, is finally coming clean about the fact that vaccine safety has never been robustly studied as he has long claimed. A paper he co-authored that was published in The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on July 6, 2024, reveals that no vaccine has ever been properly studied either before or after their release. https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-07-18-pro-jab-apologist-admits-no-vaccine-safety.html

Is that the same Lancet which published a fake paper in order to eliminate HCQ and allow the Emergency Use Authorisation of the mRNA shots? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/04/covid-19-lancet-retracts-paper-that-halted-hydroxychloroquine-trials