rattlesnake

I have the original copies of our Thai marriage certificate and of my son's Thai birth certificate, on which I am named as the father. Based on the replies in this thread, it seems this will not be enough and that my wife needs to obtain a Power of Attorney from the Thai Embassy in Paris, France.

Thanks for the replies, PoA it is then!

Cheers, I will use that too.

This happened to me once with my son, when he was still a toddler. The IO stamped his French passport when entering Thailand, we never even noticed, but upon leaving again the following year, he showed up as being on major overstay on the computer. Fortunately, the IO understood immediately what had happened and corrected the information "manually" in the system, so there was no problem. He just reminded us to always enter Thailand on the Thai passport (and check that the IO is indeed stamping that one).

Thanks Richard, I will see what other people have to say, but if there is any doubt, we will play it safe and my wife will go to the Thai embassy (fortunately she is in the Paris area) to obtain the PoA.

Yes, he always enters Thailand using his Thai passport.

I appreciate that, and can honestly respond that it is reciprocal.

I will be travelling from Thailand to France with my 12 year-old son in July, for a few weeks. My Thai wife is already there and will not be coming back to Thailand in the meantime. My son's Thai passport expired last year (we simply completely forgot about it), but his French passport is valid. I am thinking of not doing anything, based on the assumption that it will be no problem to leave and return to Thailand on an expired Thai passport, provided the French one is valid. Is my assumption correct? In any case, if I were to renew his Thai passport myself without my wife being present, is this easily done, or would she need to provide some paperwork such as an authorisation/proxy obtained from the Thai embassy in Paris? (This is an avenue I would rather avoid if possible). Thanks in advance for your insights.

You are mistaken in your assumption that I avoid mainstream content. I don't, in fact I follow it just as intently as I follow fringe content. I reject nor adhere to neither blindly, I try (as difficult as that is) to look at things as objectively as possible. My various interactions with a multitude of people has led me to conclude that perhaps my "difference" (for lack of a better word) lies in my willingness to entertain the notion that mass-scale deception is absolutely possible.

I agree. This is about Humphries, not Rogan. As for the rest of your post, thanks for the reminder on the official version, that is useful indeed.

Some compelling facts from Dr. Suzanne Humphries, regarding “polio”: First off, polio never actually disappeared. According to Dr. Humphries, “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well.” What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.” Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts – everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.” Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus – or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was – the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said. But it gets worse. The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.” According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters – and a whole lot of propaganda. She was recently on Joe Rogan's show:

I look forward to observing your learning curve:

Reminds me of a topic last year about Peter Hotez writing a book on "why so many people don't believe in 'science' anymore and what 'we' can do about it". There is nothing you can do about it. There are more "conspiracy theorists" each passing month for a reason, and those who are stuck in their default position of perceived superiority, trying to attribute this to some passing societal malfunction are going to become increasingly dissatisfied. Truth is an unstoppable force, like a plant growing under concrete: it is a slow process, but the concrete eventually cracks open.

Of course.

So is this: Stars Photoluminescence 3.mp4 Stars Photoluminescence.mp4

Yes, I recommend watching American Moon.

Also refrain from stooping to the abysmal level of insults, as it says a lot more about you than anything else and does lasting harm to your relevance.

Great, so everything should be just fine, then. I will gladly admit any mistake of mine if applicable.

RFK broke this issue down recently in an interview. The first three sentences are pretty self-explanatory. Let's pick up this discussion in a few months. “None of the vaccines that are given during the first 6 months of life have ever been tested for autism—the only one was the DTP vaccine.” “And that one study that was done, according to the National Academy of Sciences, found that there was a link.” “They threw out that study because it was based upon CDC’s surveillance system, VAERS, and they said that system is no good.” “That begs the question, why doesn’t CDC have a functional surveillance system?” “We’re gonna make sure they do have a functional surveillance system.” “They don’t do pre-licensing safety testing for vaccine. They’re the only product that’s exempt. So what they say is, if there are injuries, we’ll capture them afterward.” “But they have a system that doesn’t capture them.” “In fact, CDC’s own study of its own system said it captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “Why have we gone for 39 years and nobody’s fixed it?” “We’re gonna fix it.” “We’re gonna have gold standard science … we’re gonna publish all of our datasets, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna do replication of all our studies, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna publish our peer review, which CDC has never done.” rfk jjt.mp4

One example of many, from 2009. Trust Th€ $ci€nc€™. Pfizer to Pay $2.3 Billion for Fraudulent Marketing American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. (hereinafter together "Pfizer") have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice, to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products, the Justice Department announced today. Pharmacia & Upjohn Company has agreed to plead guilty to a felony violation of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act for misbranding Bextra with the intent to defraud or mislead Pfizer has agreed to pay $1 billion to resolve allegations under the civil False Claims Act that the company illegally promoted four drugs – Bextra; Geodon, an anti-psychotic drug; Zyvox, an antibiotic; and Lyrica, an anti-epileptic drug – and caused false claims to be submitted to government health care programs for uses that were not medically accepted indications and therefore not covered by those programs. The civil settlement also resolves allegations that Pfizer paid kickbacks to health care providers to induce them to prescribe these, as well as other, drugs. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history

I understand where you are coming from.

Metals in vaccines cause autism: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763 http://vaccinepapers.org/high-aluminum-content-autistic-brains/ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17300950 Govt studies: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23609067 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377033 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24995277 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19106436 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21299355 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21907498 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17674242 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15780490 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16870260 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19043938 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12142947 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675092 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25198681 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17454560 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3878266/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3774468/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173748/

This idea of "genetic inequality" is part of the problem. So many people are told that the reason they have debilitating diseases is because it's "in their genes", which amounts to telling them it's basically their own fault. The next step (already pushed by some leaders such as Trudeau) is euthanasia, i.e. the "culling of the weak".

It can be summed up in one word: poisoning.