rattlesnake

Here is a case study for you, Stiddle, and I am interested in knowing your take on it: When he was still a little boy (about four if I recall correctly), my son was hospitalised because of "the flu" (at least that is what they called it) which he caught at school. During his hospital stay, he passed it on to me and I spent the entire day in bed feeling terrible, typical "flu" symptoms (no energy, just getting up to walk two metres to go to the toilet was an epic quest, aching everywhere…). Anyway by the end of the day, we both felt fine again and went home (so my son had been ill for about 30 hours and I for about 10 hours). My question is, if the flu virus doesn't exist, what did we catch? The transmission factor is undeniable so it was definitely something.

I doubt it would be worthwhile or productive to continue this debate now. If RFK does what he has promised he would do, we can pick up this discussion in a few months. The MMR vaccine is particularly problematic. A CDC whistleblower leaked information to Steve Kirsch about the irrefutable link with autism (pasting the article below for the users who are interested), but this is just 'crazy conspiracy theory' of course… https://kirschsubstack.com/p/over-300-pages-of-evidence-from-the

There is no spike in measles, though there have always been sporadic outbreaks. There was one measles death between 2006 and 2015, and two between 2016 and 2025. This is a very weak case to make from a pro-vax viewpoint.

And that is the very inconvenient truth: unvaccinated people are in stellar health.

And the injected substance de facto enters the bloodstream regardless, as we are made of blood. It just isn't injected directly into the bloodstream because, supposedly, doing so would increase its chances of being destroyed. First up: unlike the layer of fat just under our skin, muscle has an excellent blood supply to help disperse the vaccine, says Joanna Groom, an immunology researcher at the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute. […] A vaccine injected directly into the bloodstream, on the other hand, is vulnerable to destruction. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2021-01-08/covid-19-vaccine-injection-upper-arm-muscle-deltoid-immune/13031918

But anyone with a modicum of honesty will acknowledge that the substance of the message conveyed in that meme – regardless of what one ultimately concludes – raises an issue worth debating, because it is grounded in reality. And that is what memes are: a medium, or a tool, and as with all tools, what matters is who is wieding it and what the intent is. (I'm in my mid-40s and off the top of my head, I must have had about 4-5 vaccines when I was a kid and probably 4-5 boosters a few years later, so that's approximately 8-10 doses.)

Let's have a look at what the CDC says: 90 doses (of 17 different vaccines) in total for children. From birth to 6 months, I counted a minimum of 17 doses. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf?CDC_AAref_Val=https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf

That would definitely be a positive development.

That's great, it won't be missed!

I find the confused emoji says "I am dumb" more than anything else, in most cases. Now that we have a couple of new ones, I wonder hom many hearts I am going to break.

Thanks for the reminder of the official cover story / sales pitch. I look forward to seeing the truth unfold.

Yes, that seems to be the consensus indeed.

He was talking about chlorine dioxide and he was right. The idiots are those who bleated the media's lies about it without checking the information independently.

Excellent stuff, will follow closely.

You should read the article. One of the benefits of actually acquainting oneself with a subject matter before speaking is that it precludes one from making gross comprehension mistakes. Red Phoenix is not complaining, he is saying this is good news.

Tenpenny supports Trump, so she would be on board.

My understanding is that it is leaving Thailand with the expired Thai passport which can be problematic. To be honest, I'm sure I could probably go to France (and back) using the expired passport, but I am not willing to risk encountering an overzealous airline staff member and/or IO and miss my flight…

I assume that the Thai embassy in Paris will be used to these situations and provide whatever document is required without too much hassle, and then my wife will just send it to me by express mail. "Notarised" probably just means "issued/stamped by an official competent body" in this case.

Below is an excerpt from the Thai government's website. If the child is less than 15 years old, it can't be done solely by a single parent. And in the case where the non-appearing parent is not in the country, this will most certainly involve the Thai Embassy abroad (Paris in my case). If a 10-year old applicant applies for an e-Passport, is it necessary for the parents to come in person to sign the parental consent form? - Applicants under the age of 15 must be accompanied by parents or a legal guardian. If parents cannot appear, at least one parent must accompany the child when applying for an e- Passport. If both parents cannot appear at the same time, one parent must accompany the applicant on the date of the application and as well bring a notarized parental consent form signed by the non-appearing parent. (parental consent form). https://www.mfa.go.th/en/page/frequently-asked-questions-faqs?menu=5e20148fc4281a00c812e8e4

In France, I was able to renew my son's passport myself, but only after having obtained a court-issued document giving me parental rights as we got married after his birth (this document is easy to obtain but indispensable for ID renewals). Every country has its own specificities and "logic". I will probably just go to the passport office and ask them.

My thoughts also.

Just to be sure I understand you correctly, Bob: You are claiming I can renew my son's passport myself, because I have my Thai marriage certificate and his Thai birth certificate (on which my wife and I are named as parents), and that a PoA is not necessary in this case?