rattlesnake

And I can see (as expected) that you are part of 2-3 stragglers who for some reason refuse to change their stance, no matter what. It is going to be interesting and amusing to see just how far it will go.

Nice effort but that's 2021 rhetoric. I would avoid posting such views from now on if I were you.

I agree with you apart from the last sentence, but still, this is a distinct step forward and I am confident the truth will be fully disclosed in the near future. Thanks.

You're right, but first, those who went along with this and participated in vilifying and persecuting those who resisted it will have to admit they were wrong and apologise to those whose life they willfully made a misery. I don't thing the pro-vaxxers on this forum are capable of that but I will give them opportunities to prove me wrong.

I have downloaded and read her full report. Excerpts: This is an issue that I have witnessed first-hand with my wife who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae, and numb hands and feet, while under observation by myself, another doctor and a registered nurse at the time of immunisation. I continue to observe the devastating effects a year and a half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation. The diagnosis and causation has been confirmed by several specialists who have told me that they have seen “a lot” of patients in a similar situation. Jackie asked me to include her story to raise awareness for others. We did a lot of homework before having the vaccine, particularly about choice of vaccine at the time. In asking about adverse side effects, we were told that “the worst thing that could happen would be anaphylaxis” and that severe reactions such as myocarditis and pericarditis were “rare”. I was also diagnosed with a vaccine injury from my second dose of Pfizer vaccine in July 2021, with the diagnosis and causation confirmed by specialist colleagues. I have had CT pulmonary angiogram, ECG, blood tests, cardiac echogram, transthoracic cardiac stress echo, Holter monitor, blood pressure monitoring and autonomic testing. Inquiry into Long COVID and Repeated COVID Infections. In my case the injury resulted in dysautonomia with intermittent fevers and cardiovascular implications including breathlessness, inappropriate sinus tachycardia and blood pressure fluctuations. These reactions were reported to the TGA at the time, but never followed up. I have spoken with other doctors who have themselves experienced a serious and persistent adverse event including cardiological, rheumatological, autoimmune reactions and neurological consequences. Patients and other members of the community have told me about their stories. Within this group of vaccine injured individuals, there is a diminishing cohort of people who have symptoms following immunisation, many of which are similar to Long COVID (such as fatigue and brain fog), but who have not had a COVID infection. These people would be an important subset or control group for studies looking into the pathophysiology, causes of and treatments for Long COVID. It is possible that there is at least some shared pathophysiology between vaccine injury and Long COVID, possibly due to the effects of spike protein. A group of Greek scientists publish a good summary on the “spike”, which points to a possible mechanism of causality. Vaccine injury is a subject that few in the medical profession have wanted to talk about. Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation, with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that “might undermine the government’s vaccine rollout” or risk suspension or loss of their registration. I raised the above points countless times on this forum over the past 15 months, and each time I was called stupid, crazy and a misinformation spreader, including by you. I have dozens of screenshots to prove it. Now in light of this testimony, are you willing to acknowledge that maybe the concerns raised over these 15 months were valid? Do you still think the Covid vaccine is safe and effective?

You're the one trying to draw attention away from the fact that à top doctor said publicly she was badly injured by the "safe and effective vaccine", that nobody would listen to her or take her seriously and that doctors are pressured into covering up vaccine injury. Again, just drop it.

Rumak addressed that point.

Maybe it's time you gave it à rest?

Indeed, and a lot of this forum's users are going to become strangely silent, all of a sudden.

As expected it is finally starting to come out… and getting increasingly harder to deny.

The only problem on that table is the Coke ???? Replace that by a beer and it's perfect.

Or too many… I noticed that lots of people I know who gave up meat these past few years have put on weight.

I've noticed that too… and they often tend to look pretty unhealthy.

Don't give yourself too much importance.

I covered this in the below topic, as you well know. I asked three questions at the top of page 5 which you conveniently avoided answering by asking other questions (see what I meant earlier by accusatory inversion?):

I think we have both made our points. Thank you for giving me this opportunity and I trust we will be exchanging again in the future.

Yeah it's called empirical observation and it's gaining unprecedented momentum in this world of unilateral pharma-funded "truth", if I were you I would pay attention. I am genuinely curious to see how long your denial will go on for.

You're not ready to see the truth yet but you will be one day.

I find it utterly disgusting that some users actually post a laughing emoticon when you say you've suffered an adverse effect. I hope you're feeling better.

In theory, it's taxpayer-funded regulation bodies. In practice, a large chunk of the money these bodies receive comes from the companies whose products they are vetting, which is very problematic: https://today.uconn.edu/2021/05/why-is-the-fda-funded-in-part-by-the-companies-it-regulates-2/#

Nothing indeed.

We're going round in circles. Did you read the article I posted above, which shows that top medical papers are paid by pharmaceutical giants?

I'll second that, MUX highly recommended.

I was not referring to advertising here. I would say the daily, unilateral and unanimous repetition of phrases such as "safe and effective" regarding a product (as well as the systematic vilifying of those who do not wish to take it) qualifies as aggressive promotion to say the least.

We are indeed discussing MSM reporting. Please address these questions: Is it a problem that the MSM receive millions from Pfizer and then aggressively promote Pfizer's products? Are the MSM credible in their presentation of the safety profiles of Pfizer's products given they receive millions from Pfizer? You mention whistleblowers, there have been several who have spoken out about Covid jabs but they were turned down by the MSM, does that surprise you given the MSM received millions from Pfizer?