rattlesnake

Reminds me of pharma giant Bayer, a former subsidiary of IG Farben, which produced Zyklon B for the nazis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer

Considering you obviously don't know what you are talking about, yes. A few examples: Inhibition of the Binding of Variants of SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Spike Protein to a Human Receptor by Chlorine Dioxide https://www.remedypublications.com/open-access/inhibition-of-the-binding-of-variants-of-sars-cov-2-coronavirus-spike-7364.pdf "These findings show that chlorine dioxide aqueous solution can inactivate the binding of the variant spike proteins to the human ACE2 receptor protein, indicating that this strategy may be useful in blocking the transmission of variant SARS-CoV-2 viruses." Protective effect of low-concentration chlorine dioxide gas against influenza A virus infection https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18089729/ Evaluation of the antiviral activity of chlorine dioxide and sodium hypochlorite against feline calicivirus, human influenza virus, measles virus, canine distemper virus, human herpesvirus, human adenovirus, canine adenovirus and canine parvovirus https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20616431/

"Take another course of Ivermectin." I have a full box of it but have never used it as I have never caught Covid.

As expected, and as always when Covid vax proponents are offered to see the damage done by the jab, you have refused. This is perfectly understandable, as it would instantly burst your bubble of falsehood. These are real people, not statistics, slogans or sweeping third-party statements. The record shows that you had the opportunity to read about thousands of Covid jab injuries and refused to do so.

"Are you also a supporter of the "America's Frontline Doctors", the discredited anti-vax mob, or perhaps believe in ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine "treatments", or perhaps you believe the 2020 USA election was stolen?" Yes to all of these questions. "Whichever one, you fit nicely into the conspiracy theory numb nuts". Yes, I have addressed this aspect in this thread. Here is a question for you: I can send you sources where thousands of people testify of their Covid jab injuries and speak of their regrets of having accepted this forced procedure, which has done considerable damage to their health. One of the biggest problems these people face is that nobody even wants to listen to them. I can't post these sources here as this forum considers them "unapproved". Are you interested in receiving them via PM?

"The problem is the insane ones…" As long as you don't break free of that mindset which leads you to systematically attack the opposing party's mental abilities, your relevance will remain extremely limited.

It is important, though, to distinguish the signifier and the signified, i.e. understand the difference between a term's literal meaning and what it actually conveys. Yes, "antivaxxer" is generally a derogatory term with associated stigma. In the collective mind, this term brings to mind ideas of psychological and even mental illness, along with other less than desirable traits and attributes. These associations were fabricated over time using very effective means of communication and influence. But to end on a more positive note, it seems this Overton window is shifting rapidly, and the Covid years were pivotal in this respect.

Such wit! I'm checkmated.

A miracle, no less! So where do pharma believers practice their faith? Vaccination centers?

Such hyperbolic language! Perhaps you should temper your starry-eyed zeal, take a step back and consider the actual results of this experiment. Most people wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot pole anymore.

Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO, does not share that view: “mRNA was a technology, but we had less experience, only two years working on this, and actually, mRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day, not vaccine, not any other medicine. So it was very counterintuitive, and I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go, and I questioned it. And I asked them to justify how can you say something like that, but they came, and they were very, very convinced that this is the right way to go.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/washington-post-live/2022/03/10/transcript-wp-subscriber-exclusive-albert-bourla-author-moonshot-inside-pfizers-nine-month-race-make-impossible-possible/

I'm guessing "pay for performance" i.e. he doesn't frequent prostitutes.

Pfizer's 2022 revenue was 100 billion dollars. Moderna's was 18.4 billion dollars. Is health the crux of the issue here? The Covid pandemic drives Pfizer’s 2022 revenue to a record $100 billion https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/31/the-covid-pandemic-drives-pfizers-2022-revenue-to-a-record-100-billion.html Moderna reaped $18.4B in COVID vaccine sales last year, projects at least $5B in 2023 https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/moderna-covid-vax-scarfed-sales-184b-2022-company-says

He was talking about chlorine dioxide and he was absolutely right. Trump did a great job of informing the public of the available treatments for Covid.

"The researchers also found that people with certain personality traits, such as a sense of antagonism toward others and high levels of paranoia, were more prone to believe conspiracy theories. Those who strongly believed in conspiracy theories were also more likely to be insecure, paranoid, emotionally volatile, impulsive, suspicious, withdrawn, manipulative, egocentric and eccentric." Yep, that's me. Bang on the money as always, Brian.

Simply quoting senior Pfizer executive Janine Small: “Regarding the question around, um, did we know about stopping the immunisation [sic] before it entered the market? No, heh,” she said. “Uh, these, um, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market, and from that point of view we had to do everything at risk." https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414 Several "fact-checking" articles were subsequently released to mitigate the impact of this statement (I am sure the usual pharma proponents of this forum will be diligently typing the relevant keywords on Google and posting the results within seconds of this post's publication). But this what she said nonetheless. I think she knew exactly what she was talking about.

They called it "moving at the speed of science", which in more colloquial terms means "making stuff up as you go along".

The vaccinated are not doing well.

You're probably right.

So Daikin are the most efficient units? Interesting.

And you are living proof that it is possible to recover… Your testimony is invaluable, as it proves that breaking free from the pharmaceutical paradigm is the first step to a healthy lifestyle. I see someone posted a laughing emoticon to your message. It's unbelievable how low some people can stoop.

Excellent clarification, I wholeheartedly agree. As you say, it is totally irrelevant and wrong to claim (as has been repeated ad nauseam on this forum) that the unvaccinated are flooding the hospitals. Glad we've got that out of the way and I will quote you when needed.

What was the vaccination status of the deceased?

Trust me, I don't.

Nobody cares what you're sick of.