Jump to content

rattlesnake

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,359
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by rattlesnake

  1. He was talking about chlorine dioxide and he was absolutely right. Trump did a great job of informing the public of the available treatments for Covid.
  2. "The researchers also found that people with certain personality traits, such as a sense of antagonism toward others and high levels of paranoia, were more prone to believe conspiracy theories. Those who strongly believed in conspiracy theories were also more likely to be insecure, paranoid, emotionally volatile, impulsive, suspicious, withdrawn, manipulative, egocentric and eccentric." Yep, that's me. Bang on the money as always, Brian.
  3. Simply quoting senior Pfizer executive Janine Small: “Regarding the question around, um, did we know about stopping the immunisation [sic] before it entered the market? No, heh,” she said. “Uh, these, um, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market, and from that point of view we had to do everything at risk." https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414 Several "fact-checking" articles were subsequently released to mitigate the impact of this statement (I am sure the usual pharma proponents of this forum will be diligently typing the relevant keywords on Google and posting the results within seconds of this post's publication). But this what she said nonetheless. I think she knew exactly what she was talking about.
  4. They called it "moving at the speed of science", which in more colloquial terms means "making stuff up as you go along".
  5. The vaccinated are not doing well.
  6. You're probably right.
  7. So Daikin are the most efficient units? Interesting.
  8. And you are living proof that it is possible to recover… Your testimony is invaluable, as it proves that breaking free from the pharmaceutical paradigm is the first step to a healthy lifestyle. I see someone posted a laughing emoticon to your message. It's unbelievable how low some people can stoop.
  9. Excellent clarification, I wholeheartedly agree. As you say, it is totally irrelevant and wrong to claim (as has been repeated ad nauseam on this forum) that the unvaccinated are flooding the hospitals. Glad we've got that out of the way and I will quote you when needed.
  10. What was the vaccination status of the deceased?
  11. Nobody cares what you're sick of.
  12. Thanks for your testimony about your Covid vaccination injury, hopefully all the injured people will speak out as you do, it's the only way the dam will burst. I hope things will work out for you.
  13. We know what has been causing these shingles-like rashes. Elephant in the room.
  14. You are repeatedly demonstrating my point. This article is from 2022, when it was still possible to misrepresent the data. You need to get back on Google and find a recent article stating your desired catchphrase, backed by credible data. Good luck!
  15. So we have established that your claim that the unvaccinated are filling up the hospitals is false. We're progressing.
  16. Let's leave my IQ out of this, Danderman. I already congratulated you for managing to find the Washington report. Now, to make blanket statements such as "the unvaccinated are filling up hospitals", you need broader, consistent data across several territories. You won't be able to find any because the same "health" agencies who repeatedly made these statements mysteriously stopped publishing this data months ago. I asked you what your take was on that. You have avoided answering. If I push you a bit, you might come up with another deflection attempt or give me a dubious reason such as "they only published data during the pandemic" blah blah. When the truth is, we all know they don't publish this data anymore because it shows that the hospitals are full of vaccinated people, a rather inconvenient fact. Laughable.
  17. "Health" agencies have not reported the vaccination status of hospitalized people for months. So in the absence of data, it is not valid to assert that the hospitals are full of unvaccinated people.
  18. From the page you linked:
  19. Congratulations on finding the one period and location matching your view, mustn't have been easy. What's your take on these two? While we're at it, why do you think the CDC and the French and UK "health" agencies stopped reporting vaccination statuses of hospitalizations?
  20. There are only two metrics mentioned in the study, up-to-date and not up-to-date. You made up a third category: "UNVACCINATED: No protection." I think you mean: UNVACCINATED: Natural immunity. Never sick, in perfect health, but not generating a dime for the pharmaceutical industrial complex.
  21. "Divided views", what a nice euphemism! We've come a long way, I remember very well when those who challenged the official narrative on the natural origin were called nutcase conspiracy theorists.
  22. It's not that complicated, jaywalker. What the CDC said was very clear, before they attempted a pathetic "clarification". Here is a study by Cleveland Clinic which concludes the vaxxed are more prone to being infected: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.06.09.23290893v1.full-text And regardless of what the $ci€nc€ says, empirical observation shows that the vaxxed are catching Covid repeatedly, as confirmed by lots of them on this forum. What can I say? It is truly and utterly laughable.
  23. Yes it does, but I don't expect vax zealots to acknowledge it.
×
×
  • Create New...