youreavinalaff

That makes no difference to how different offices or even officers feel on the day. The last time I needed a 60 day extension my wife was working. Immigration accepted the situation, saw I had the required paperwork and issued the extension.

Like I said, no hierarchy. My guess would be many posters, especially those who are not up to speed in immigration issues would not know what CW means. But.....there you go. Mine is BCA.

Agents can't magic away any issues you may have. They simply check the application is in order. I guess they could advise against leaving out details that could be detrimental but that would be lying on a visa application. Not a good idea.

You post is a great example of how you will never achieve your intention of replacing the immigration rule guru. You take things too literally and personally. This is a forum. Conversation is the name of the game. No leaders. Everyone throwing their hat into the ring. One post illiciting info from others. No hierarchy. Try it.

Some do, yes. Those in more casual, walk in, local jobs I was thinking more of the Thais I know from our village. Those who have had to upsticks and move away to get jobs. Many have rented accommodation involving contracts and large deposits, some offered as part of the job. They are tied and have no other options.

Check with them on extensions. Ask how many you can do per entry to Thailand. If only one, obviously go for 60 days.

I'd be inclined to fly. Air Asia Bangkok direct to Siem Reap. The Angkor tour is tiring in itself. Would be good to get there feeling fresh. I actually preferred Angkor Thom to Angkhor Wat. With that in mind, make sure you buy the full tour ticket ($37 last time I was there), book a tuk tuk for the day or 2 days and do the full tour.

The point is, we don't know what office the OP is using. Each office often implement their own rules. The OP could well be using the same immigration office as I do and, thus, your comments are inane. The immigration office he will use may have the same rule as the one I use. Once again making your comment inane. You may not be interested. That has no bearing on the OP's situation.

You quoted me, you made an incorrect comment, I corrected. Simple.

Our local immigration office will only allow on extension per entry. Either 30 or 60 days.

Not required for 60 days.

An incorrect assumption.

Really? I don't think so.

As someone who has lived and worked in Thailand for over 20 years, I would say I have plenty of knowledge.

Unions? No threat in Thailand. Labour Debt? No threat either. Overtime? No. Staff turnover? Staff won't leave. No other options.

It won't make any difference. Large companies, if forced to pay more on salaries, will increase hours, cut any breaks staff might get and impose stricter targets. I know of a restaurant that used to let staff stay in a house adjoining the place free of charge. When minimum wage was last increased, the house was then charged at 2000b a month.

Nice bit of right wing propaganda there. Sadly, for you, it's flawed.

Either she didn't or it was pre 2004. Either way, not much use to today's discussion.

Do you have a VOA or are you on a visa exempt? What is your nationality?

You are correct. You don't have to back up opinions. However, you made an incorrect statement. I just trotted off to do as you asked. Here you go. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/sn01403/

I'll explain once more. 24% is not "most". That is incorrect. It is one of your beliefs.

It's called conversation. You'll get it one day, but probably not if the conversation goes against your, incorrect, beliefs.

24% was in response you your "most". Perfectly relevant.

No, I don't. Nice, selective quoting, BTW.

24% of applications rejected last year. UK government intelligence is going to be more than a match for migrants arriving as most of them do. 24% is not " most".