A former deputy leader of the Palang Pracharath Party has criticised the transfer of Phuket’s governor and deputy governors, arguing that the move does not address the root causes of problems in the province and serves only to ease public pressure.
Get today's headlines by email 
On 19 June 2026, Suradej Yasawat said the reassignment of Phuket’s governor and two deputy governors was a response to symptoms rather than causes. He noted that the two deputy governors, who had reportedly been linked to conflicts and other issues in Phuket, were transferred to Nakhon Si Thammarat and Songkhla, provinces he described as equally important and lucrative as Phuket.
He argued that the transfers should not be viewed as punishment and suggested the government’s intention was merely to reduce public criticism. He also questioned why the former governor, whom he described as having performed well and allegedly faced opposition from deputy governors after blocking certain actions, was not allowed to continue in the role.
Suradej said the government must tackle the issue systematically and create stronger checks and balances within provincial administration. He called for central police units to investigate local influence networks, protection rackets and links to foreign nominee businesses, claiming authorities already know who is involved and which foreign groups are connected.
He proposed using Phuket as a model for dealing with influential figures and suggested agencies such as the Crime Suppression Division and the Department of Special Investigation should be deployed. According to Suradej, the presence of central investigators would make local police and officials more cautious and less willing to accept bribes.
Addressing concerns over foreign nominee shareholding and grey capital, he said the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 already carries severe penalties, including imprisonment of up to three years, fines ranging from 100,000 to 1,000,000 baht, and additional daily fines of 10,000 to 50,000 baht. He argued that stricter enforcement would significantly reduce nominee business activity.
Suradej also linked the issue to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and the Russia-Ukraine war, saying people from affected countries are seeking new places to live and do business. He argued that Thailand’s visa-free entry scheme is no longer necessary and creates security risks by allowing large numbers of visitors to enter without prior screening.
He said reducing visa-free stays from 60 days to 30, 15 or even 10 days would not solve the problem and instead called for the complete cancellation of visa-free entry. He argued that all visitors should go through embassy screening to identify criminal backgrounds before arrival.
Suradej claimed that foreign grey capital groups, including some from China, were establishing themselves in Thailand and expanding their networks. He also referred to concerns about groups of Israelis in Koh Phangan and Pai, saying authorities should prevent foreigners from taking jobs from Thai citizens or creating local problems.
He rejected suggestions that ending visa-free entry would damage tourism, arguing that Thailand should focus on attracting quality tourists who visit and return home rather than individuals seeking opportunities for illegal business activities.
ThaiRath reported that Suradej urged the prime minister and government to take more decisive action, saying the response should go beyond site visits, ministerial assignments and administrative transfers, and instead deliver visible and measurable improvements for local residents.
Related stories
Phuket-land-nominee-crackdown-ordered
Anutin-defends-Phuket-governor-transfer
Join the discussion? 
Already a member? 
Adapted by ASEAN Now ThaiRath 20 June 2026