Well, I think that history will, as usual, judge him harshly as he has squandered much good will and faith that the US public afforded him. Yes, plenty of missteps but they could have been avoided with decent advice... but also some okay decisions to to be fair. However, the mainstream media is generally biased one way or the other and engaged in a social engineering battle, and focuses on the negative because outrage gets likes and hits which makes people keep on being attentive. Trump has fallen into the classic political trap of surrounding yourself with sycophants and "Yes men" that just want to be near the levers of power and are not actually that competent, just know how to flatter properly. In Trump's first term, he was surrounded by competent professions from their areas of expertise... but he couldn't hack being told the truth. Trump is a normal dictatorial CEO from the business world, and they don't do discussion... they give out orders and expect corporate obedience with no questions asked. You can't do that running a country, as it doesn't work. This is also probably why he admires the tyrants of the world and is happy to engage with them. So, that means, when he got in again off the happenings of his previous term, he went completely the other way... plus he's going a bit fruity, like Biden did, with strange statements and outbursts. This is why the Republicans will probably have poor midterm election results... we'll see, as the US midterms are always hard to call due to people now not telling the polling companies the truth (they save it for when they are alone in the ballot booth), but often the sitting president does badly. Trump could have nailed it and proved everyone wrong but he is/was ultimately out of his depth. There are many people that say that the first time he ran, he just wanted to come a respectable second, not win it, because it would be good for business... and then won and couldn't believe it. He has a fragile ego as he has always been fawned over by those around him... and politics isn't really like that CEO boardroom environment, especially international politics. As a politician, you have to understand the concept of Realpolitik and not just have a hissyfit if you get an answer you weren't expecting, need more abstract strategic thought (which you are supposed to get from professional advisors)... that's why you have diplomats in other countries as it's not often what you say, it's the way you say it.