watgate Posted January 13, 2018 Share Posted January 13, 2018 Is it correct that a US citizen can not reside in Thailand for more then 6 months so as to not become ineligible for Medicare once you turn 65? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lopburi3 Posted January 13, 2018 Share Posted January 13, 2018 Medicare can not be used in most locations outside the USA but there is no turn off for having lived overseas that I have ever heard of. Suspect you have confused with some other countries socialized medicine residency requirements. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watgate Posted January 13, 2018 Author Share Posted January 13, 2018 What about if you are enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Plan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted January 13, 2018 Share Posted January 13, 2018 Eligibility for Medicare is only based on work credits over your life but as said it can't be used outside of the U.S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheryl Posted January 13, 2018 Share Posted January 13, 2018 As above. You can reside 12 months a year in Thailand (or any other country) and still have medicare. I do. So does every other American of Medicare age I know of living here BUT it does not pay for medical care here. You have to go back to the US to use it . Sent from my SM-J701F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watgate Posted January 13, 2018 Author Share Posted January 13, 2018 I am still perplexed because a friend told me he has a group medicare advantage PPO plan and he said the handbook states if you are away from their service area for more than 6 months you will be terminated from the above mentioned plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted January 13, 2018 Share Posted January 13, 2018 1 hour ago, watgate said: I am still perplexed because a friend told me he has a group medicare advantage PPO plan and he said the handbook states if you are away from their service area for more than 6 months you will be terminated from the above mentioned plan. That's not standard Medicare. That's a PRIVATE plan. https://www.medicare.gov/sign-up-change-plans/medicare-health-plans/medicare-advantage-plans/medicare-advantage-plans.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanyaburi Mac Posted January 13, 2018 Share Posted January 13, 2018 The "standard," and minimum, Medicare is Part A, free. I have it, since it's free, but only good for use if I happen to visit the U.S., not good here in Thailand. Everything else with "medicare" in the name, such as Part B and so on, you need to pay extra for and I don't think these add-ons are good overseas. Mac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willyumcr Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 I think he is referring to a senior medical plan such as Kaiser Advantage (Northwest) which is in conjunction with medicare. And Kaiser covers "emergency" and "urgent" while traveling (Thailand) but must reside in USA in covered area and not be out of area more than 6 consecutive months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpcoe Posted January 31, 2018 Share Posted January 31, 2018 On 1/13/2018 at 11:16 PM, watgate said: I am still perplexed because a friend told me he has a group medicare advantage PPO plan and he said the handbook states if you are away from their service area for more than 6 months you will be terminated from the above mentioned plan. I believe that's more of a PPO-related restriction than a Medicare-related restricted. i.e. Anybody enrolled in that PPO, whether on a Medicare plan or pre-retirement age, must live in their service area to receive treatment. To set limits on it, they drop you from the plan if you don't live in the service area full-time at a six month limit. Very similar with HMOs, if you are more familiar with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiBob Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 On 1/13/2018 at 11:16 PM, watgate said: I am still perplexed because a friend told me he has a group medicare advantage PPO plan and he said the handbook states if you are away from their service area for more than 6 months you will be terminated from the above mentioned plan. I agree with posts #9 and #10. Many plans have a regional area so they can provide discounts within their service area. If you live out of area then that defeats the plan's business model. My old plan was like that but my new is administered by Anthem and has no area restriction with worldwide urgent care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 (edited) On 1/14/2018 at 6:34 AM, Thanyaburi Mac said: The "standard," and minimum, Medicare is Part A, free. I have it, since it's free, but only good for use if I happen to visit the U.S., not good here in Thailand. Everything else with "medicare" in the name, such as Part B and so on, you need to pay extra for and I don't think these add-ons are good overseas. Mac Yes, but my understanding is that for the "extra" stuff if you don't pay for it while overseas, IF you repatriate you will be penalized for that and charged more. I realize many people think they may never repatriate, but people change their minds about things, even old people. Edited February 1, 2018 by Jingthing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThaiBob Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 5 hours ago, Jingthing said: Yes, but my understanding is that for the "extra" stuff if you don't pay for it while overseas, IF you repatriate you will be penalized for that and charged more. I realize many people think they may never repatriate, but people change their minds about things, even old people. Many Americans unwisely drop their part B coverage thinking they will never have to repatriate. Then living here they have a major health problem and are forced to repatriate basically broke. Returning, they must pay a major penalty for part B coverage which is needed to get Medicare part c (drug coverage) or get a Medicare supplement or advantage policy. Part B is government funded with additional premiums from Medicare enrollees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpcoe Posted February 3, 2018 Share Posted February 3, 2018 The penalty adds up, too: In most cases, if you don't sign up for Part B when you're first eligible, you'll have to pay a late enrollment penalty. You'll have to pay this penalty for as long as you have Part B. Your monthly premium for Part B may go up 10% for each full 12-month period that you could have had Part B, but didn't sign up for it. Also, you may have to wait until the General Enrollment Period (from January 1 to March 31) to enroll in Part B. Coverage will start July 1 of that year. source: Medicare web page The standard Part B premium amount in 2018 is $134 (or higher depending on your income). So, if you became eligible today but waited five years to enroll, you'd pay $201 monthly ... for the rest of your life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonray Posted February 3, 2018 Share Posted February 3, 2018 1 hour ago, wpcoe said: The penalty adds up, too: source: Medicare web page The standard Part B premium amount in 2018 is $134 (or higher depending on your income). So, if you became eligible today but waited five years to enroll, you'd pay $201 monthly ... for the rest of your life. Save 134 x 60 months = 8040 in five years. That 8040 will then cover 3.33 years (40) months once signed up. So really not penalized until 8.33 years past age 65 (age 73 +). Food for thought Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted February 3, 2018 Share Posted February 3, 2018 3 hours ago, tonray said: Save 134 x 60 months = 8040 in five years. That 8040 will then cover 3.33 years (40) months once signed up. So really not penalized until 8.33 years past age 65 (age 73 +). Food for thought Thanks for that. It seems to me it's another variation on the even more consequential decision on whether to claim social security early, at "full" age, or late up till age 70. A big part of whether it matters much or not is life expectancy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now