webfact Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 Monk defrocked over alleged sexual encounter on temple grounds By The Nation File photo /source: Wipipedia A Chai Nat monk was defrocked yesterday after a woman and used condoms were found in his living quarters provided by his temple. Administrative officials, police and soldiers jointly conducted a raid of the living quarters assigned to Phra Somporn Sukhesino in the middle of Saturday night after receiving a complaint from local residents that the monk had slept with women. Celibacy is one of the monastic rules for Buddhist monks. Phra Somporn Sukhesino, 49, and the unidentified woman found inside his living quarters, 44, denied having sexual relations. “I just asked for a place to stay because I had family problems,” the woman said. Phra Khru Wichai Kijjatorn, the deputy monastic chief of Muang Chai Nat district, looked into the case and resolved to order the defrocking of Phra Somporn Sukhesino. Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/national/30338583 -- © Copyright The Nation 2018-02-12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron19 Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 Off topic post removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post colinneil Posted February 12, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted February 12, 2018 Monk getting his leg over, nothing new about that. At least he practiced safe sex. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Get Real Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 Sounds to me like he have to go on a shopping spree and buy new clothes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEngBKK Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 Religion is the opium of the people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
webfact Posted February 12, 2018 Author Share Posted February 12, 2018 Monk defrocked despite denying sex party claims Picture: Manager Online Soldiers and the local authority swooped on a Chainat temple after townsfolk told them a woman called "A" had gone to have sexual relations with a monk. When the military arrived at Wat Khao Tha Lap Phra Somporn Sukhesino - in lay life called plain Somporn Singpreecha - and A were in separate rooms in the cloister. However, under her bed they found a used condom. In the monk's room they located the woman's bag and purse in a drawer of his. Their explanations didn't add up to a cohesive denial of sexual misdemeanor. The confusion - and skepticism - of the soldiers was compounded when a 12 year old "dek wat" (temple child) associate of Somporn said that the condom was in fact his. He was in the habit of urinating in condoms for fun, reported Manager. His urine was tested for drugs but nothing untoward was detected. Then another lady showed up. "B" said that she and "A" had spent the night in Somporn's room in the past but nothing irregular happened. Amid all this shenanigans the military took Somporn to a local Buddhist religious leader for defrocking as they were convinced that he had brought the good name of the religion into disrepute. Source: Manager Online -- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2018-02-12 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post sammieuk1 Posted February 12, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted February 12, 2018 Defrocking was his original problem. 2 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Nasrullah Posted February 12, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted February 12, 2018 1 hour ago, webfact said: Amid all this shenanigans the military took Somporn to a local Buddhist religious leader for defrocking as they were convinced that he had brought the good name of the religion into disrepute. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Darcula Posted February 12, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, webfact said: Then another lady showed up. "B" said that she and "A" had spent the night in Somporn's room in the past but nothing irregular happened. Nothing irrregular, other than a 12 year old boy who just urinated in a condom and left it under the bed. Yup, just a quiet night in a buddhist temple. Edited February 12, 2018 by Darcula 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manchega Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 4 hours ago, webfact said: Monk defrocked despite denying sex party claims Picture: Manager Online Soldiers and the local authority swooped on a Chainat temple after townsfolk told them a woman called "A" had gone to have sexual relations with a monk. When the military arrived at Wat Khao Tha Lap Phra Somporn Sukhesino - in lay life called plain Somporn Singpreecha - and A were in separate rooms in the cloister. However, under her bed they found a used condom. In the monk's room they located the woman's bag and purse in a drawer of his. Their explanations didn't add up to a cohesive denial of sexual misdemeanor. The confusion - and skepticism - of the soldiers was compounded when a 12 year old "dek wat" (temple child) associate of Somporn said that the condom was in fact his. He was in the habit of urinating in condoms for fun, reported Manager. His urine was tested for drugs but nothing untoward was detected. Then another lady showed up. "B" said that she and "A" had spent the night in Somporn's room in the past but nothing irregular happened. Amid all this shenanigans the military took Somporn to a local Buddhist religious leader for defrocking as they were convinced that he had brought the good name of the religion into disrepute. Source: Manager Online -- © Copyright Thai Visa News 2018-02-12 good name? oh you mean the ones who just have expensive smart phones, visit high street stores, sleep with women in brothels and take first class travel everywhere, those are the ones whose names in the religeon would not want to be brought into disrepute, cos they is highly religious peoples who follow all tenets of buddhism, except for the humble and not owning possessions bit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantom Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 Call me a naive and simple fool, but soldiers and local authority 'swooped' on a temple??? Why army for gods sake? Let alone local authorities (whoever they are). He has been defrocked but the burden of proof is, to put it kindly, wanting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFishman1 Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 Well all I can say TIT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinneil Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 7 minutes ago, TheFishman1 said: Well all I can say TIT Well he was probably playing with them as well. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wavemanwww Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 No wonder I'm agnostic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantom Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 Last time the army was sent into a temple to do harm to a priest was in 1170 in the UK "What miserable drones and traitors have I nourished and brought up in my household, who let their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born cleric?" It did not come out well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pumpjack Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 wow these monks need some sort of sexual release 2 days ago i read on tv that a monk was caught stealing ladies panties of washing lines to sniff. sure its nothing compared to our priests here in western world, vatican and all of the catholic church is ripe with peadophiles !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farcanell Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 1 hour ago, fantom said: Last time the army was sent into a temple to do harm to a priest was in 1170 in the UK "What miserable drones and traitors have I nourished and brought up in my household, who let their lord be treated with such shameful contempt by a low-born cleric?" It did not come out well. Lol.... I’m pretty sure your closing your mind to a large portion of history. “kill them all, god will know his own” allegedly ordered before the sack of Béziers, springs to mind.... not to mention the reformation of the church in England under Henry 8th and... etc etc etc.... But... nice one 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
farcanell Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 So... with the beach positioning of a nice decorative Buddha bust being decried with demands that foreigners be taught more about Buddhist culture... whilst trying ( unsuccessfully unfortunately) not to laugh, I wonder if it’s not more appropriate to educate locals on Buddhism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bangkok Barry Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 4 hours ago, fantom said: Call me a naive and simple fool, but soldiers and local authority 'swooped' on a temple??? Why army for gods sake? Let alone local authorities (whoever they are). He has been defrocked but the burden of proof is, to put it kindly, wanting. Why? Because the police don't do their job. The army has done it for them countless times since the military took over running the country. Probably the only positive from the coup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fantom Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 And why is it a police matter let alone an army one? I can understand why the temple authorities may have a fit of the vapors, but the army / police? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justfine Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 Men wearing frocks is abnormal to begin with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Retiredandhappyhere Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 Thank God I'm an agnostic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now