Jump to content

Dual pricing. Fair or price gouging?


webfact

Recommended Posts

Dual pricing. Fair or price gouging?

People have their say about the dual pricing issue in Thailand

By Tanutam Thawan

 

29366456_1648693505208471_91872746492080  

Photo TIT – This Is Thailand Facebook page

 

Thailand’s dual pricing policy continues with, it seems, a completely random application of the system. In some places flashing your Work Permit might get you an exemption so you can pay local price but there is no consistency.

 

What are your experiences with dual pricing? Do you think it’s fair? If we’re receiving the same service, shouldn’t the price be the same? Here are some reactions from the Phuket Gazette Facebook page.

 

“It’s about 4 pound why moan your in a beautiful place yes it different price for Thai but when our wage is £100+a day and a Thai wage is 400 baht a day can you see why price different” Dean

 

Full story: https://www.phuketgazette.net/news/dual-pricing-fair-or-price-gouging

 
pgazette_logo-20170817.jpg
-- © Copyright Phuket Gazette 2018-03-19
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mercman24 said:

a complete and utter con, poor people cannot go to these places for a start their goal in life is to make enough baht to put food on the table, its only the well to do THAIS with cars that visit these places anyway,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

 

Nonsense, most visitors are kids on school trips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've been through all this so many times before.  Dual pricing is common throughout the world, however normally it is based on residency not nationality, in which case the OAP's and WP holders would be eligible for the same rate as Thai nationals and it would only be the tourists who were charged more.  If that were the case in Thailand I do not think we would be having this discussion.

 

And just to add, I visit the NP's a lot in Thailand, I have no issue paying the entrance fee, it costs the price of a beer more than my wife's ticket and since they introduced the new payments in 1998 the parks have gone from being among the worst in SE.Asia to being the best, so actually I am very happy to contribute.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Here how about pricing it  according to what car you drive, Mercedes 200 baht pick up 50 baht BMW 200 baht etc etc that will then rationalise the crap about "us" earning more.

Edited by kannot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

We've been through all this so many times before.  Dual pricing is common throughout the world, however normally it is based on residency not nationality, in which case the OAP's and WP holders would be eligible for the same rate as Thai nationals and it would only be the tourists who were charged more.  If that were the case in Thailand I do not think we would be having this discussion.

 

And just to add, I visit the NP's a lot in Thailand, I have no issue paying the entrance fee, it costs the price of a beer more than my wife's ticket and since they introduced the new payments in 1998 the parks have gone from being among the worst in SE.Asia to being the best, so actually I am very happy to contribute.

Try the one at Sam roiYot national park and let me know how you find  the boardwalk, Id  say it  justifies it as a man trap walk thru the mangroves, absolutely shocking!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this dual pricing is ludicrous, and completely racist.  It needs to be completely done away with.  Having said that, the 3 times that my wife, son, niece and I went to parks here in Chiang Mai, I simply showed both my Thai driver's license and my Thai ID, and was charged the Thai price.  That's not possible for tourists, I know, but should be possible for any/all long term residents.  Try that and see what happens. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see nothing wrong in charging different rates. South African National Parks for instance charge a conservation fee which is four times higher for non residents than for an ID carrying South African. SADC residents pay double the price. This merely reflects the fact that most foreigners earn much more than most locals.

 

What Thailand does wrong is the way they communicate. In S Africa what foreigners pay is referred to as the Standard Fee! This clearly shows that locals are getting a discount. If it was communicated in this way here it would appear to be less of a punitive price hike, although there will always be moaners who enjoy nothing more than to complain about differential pricing. 

 

If you are upset that the extra that you have to pay as a farang is the equivalent of a simple Starbucks coffee then I am sorry for you. You must have a very unhappy life.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, kannot said:

Try the one at Sam roiYot national park and let me know how you find  the boardwalk, Id  say it  justifies it as a man trap walk thru the mangroves, absolutely shocking!

 

When I spoke of improvements in the parks, I did not mean infrastructure, I meant reducing poaching, increasing habitat area and increasing numbers of endangered species, in which Thailand is now the S.E.Asian leader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, brommers said:

I see nothing wrong in charging different rates. South African National Parks for instance charge a conservation fee which is four times higher for non residents than for an ID carrying South African. SADC residents pay double the price. This merely reflects the fact that most foreigners earn much more than most locals.

 

What Thailand does wrong is the way they communicate. In S Africa what foreigners pay is referred to as the Standard Fee! This clearly shows that locals are getting a discount. If it was communicated in this way here it would appear to be less of a punitive price hike, although there will always be moaners who enjoy nothing more than to complain about differential pricing. 

 

If you are upset that the extra that you have to pay as a farang is the equivalent of a simple Starbucks coffee then I am sorry for you. You must have a very unhappy life.

Why do most foreigners earn much more than locals!

Edited by metisdead
Please do not modify someone else's post in your quoted reply, either with font or color changes or wording.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually agree with dual pricing. But saying I agree with it does not mean I agree with blatant rip off prices. If I have to pay 20% more for a park or something, I can live with that - but like the sign in the picture - 1,000% more ?  That is just taking the urine.

 

I am sure a lot of parks back in my UK get money from the tax payer to upgrade them. Money from hard working tax payers. I think most Brits would agree that if they has to pay to get into the park, it should be slightly less than those that have NOT contributed via the tax system. So a reflection of that here would be fair.

 

Problem though is what constitutes foreigner ? Is a half farang child Thai with Thai citizenship Thai or not ?  Should I be considered a foreigner even though I have probably contributed more to the Thai financial economy and tax than most Thais in a lifetime in the years I've been here ?   

Edited by RichardColeman
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...