Teen stunned as his picture of newborn puppy banned from Facebook - but you can see why

[snoop1130]

Teen stunned as his picture of newborn puppy banned from Facebook - but you can see why

By Jessica Cripps

 

Owner Dominic Ibaos shared a picture of the puppy, but it all went horribly wrong

 

A newborn hairless puppy has fallen foul of Facebook in a hilarious mix-up - because a picture of him was mistaken for a human penis.

 

The image was innocently shared by a teenager who wanted to proudly show off his new pet.

 

Dominic Ibaos, 16, was stunned when the picture was reported as an indecent image after he posted it in a group for animal lovers.

 

The viewer saw the dog's bald body, wrinkled neck and pink head and thought it was a 'd**k pic'.

 

Full Story: https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/teen-stunned-picture-newborn-puppy-12524783

[arithai12]

Mine doesn't look like that, thankfully.

 

[Artisi]

It's ugly enough to be banned without looking like d ick. 

[Skeptic7]

Actually...no, can't see why at all. Looks like a hairless, newborn puppy. While "dicks" do have a head and one eye...they  don't have legs, paws w/nails nor a tail! At least mine doesn't! 

[Artisi]

1 minute ago, Skeptic7 said:

Actually...no, can't see why at all. Looks like a hairless, newborn puppy. While "dicks" do have a head and one eye...they  don't have legs, paws w/nails nor a tail! At least mine doesn't! 

I'll bet more than you are happy about that   

[Confuscious]

17 minutes ago, Skeptic7 said:

Actually...no, can't see why at all. Looks like a hairless, newborn puppy. While "dicks" do have a head and one eye...they  don't have legs, paws w/nails nor a tail! At least mine doesn't! 

Depends who the actual "dick" is?
The poster or the puppy?

[Mitker]

click on the link and have a look at the other pics: it makes more sense