Justfine Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 10 minutes ago, banglay said: No ..these gym learn you to fight in a controlled environment....an urban attack by a predictor has no relevance.it is a different scenario . I taught basic techniques to females ..the first thing we taught.. was the attacker is not attacking them the attacker is attacking there daughters or sons .... a mother will always fight to protect there off spring .... women in general are more likely to be passive if the attack is on them . this is not a human trait . a mother will all way fight for her off spring no matter what animal they may be . Knowing how to punch, elbow, kick, knee and wrestle helps in any situation. Front kicks are a very effective defensive move if someone has a knife for example. Choke holds can render the other person helpless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banglay Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 3 minutes ago, Justfine said: Knowing how to punch, elbow, kick, knee and wrestle helps in any situation. Front kicks are a very effective defensive move if someone has a knife for example. Choke holds can render the other person helpless. maybe so that is in a gym environment......not may people have the strength of capabilities or the will to do these .if it was that simple ...everyone would over power an attacker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justfine Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 Just now, banglay said: maybe so that is in a gym environment......not may people have the strength of capabilities or the will to do these .if it was that simple ...everyone would over power an attacker A kick is a kick. I can break someone's leg with a kick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justfine Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 ..".everyone would over power an attacker" Most people can't fight. Doing a 3 week training course is pretty useless though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banglay Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 2 minutes ago, Justfine said: A kick is a kick. I can break someone's leg with a kick. wow you must be a 8th dan exponent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justfine Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 32 minutes ago, banglay said: wow you must be a 8th dan exponent Fighting is mostly power, speed and a few skills. If you don't have the first 2 then a short self defense course is useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justfine Posted May 23, 2018 Share Posted May 23, 2018 21 minutes ago, hyku1147 said: When I was young and stupid, I used the sucker kick to the nuts. I don't see why a female couldn't do it effectively. Alternatively, if she can convince the rapist that she has submitted, then she could gain access to his genitalia. Pretty easy to block a kick unless it's fast. Women are better off running and screaming unless they are butch with lots of training. A 60kg woman with a 3 week training course and nothing else has no hope against a strong male. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norrska Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 (edited) 13 hours ago, banglay said: No ..these gym learn you to fight in a controlled environment....an urban attack by a predictor has no relevance.it is a different scenario . I taught basic techniques to females ..the first thing we taught.. was the attacker is not attacking them the attacker is attacking there daughters or sons .... a mother will always fight to protect there off spring .... women in general are more likely to be passive if the attack is on them . this is not a human trait . a mother will all way fight for her off spring no matter what animal they may be . Some of what you write is true and the rest is pure bs. Humans beings aren't animals and can be taught specific techniques which along with instinct will help in self-defense. It is a first line visible deterrent against aggression, but will not work in all cases. It's a bit like locking your front door. It will keep out some of the riff raff, but a professional burglar will get past the defenses no matter what you have. However, I am interested in hearing about your dubious teaching method,which seems to rely on no techniques and only maternal instincts. A true martial artist will learn all the techniques and then forget them all as they are already committed to the body's memory and will present naturally when called upon. Bruce Lee called this the art of Edited May 24, 2018 by norrska Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norrska Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 12 hours ago, hyku1147 said: When I was young and stupid, I used the sucker kick to the nuts. I don't see why a female couldn't do it effectively. Alternatively, if she can convince the rapist that she has submitted, then she could gain access to his genitalia. Going around "sucker" kicking or punching anyone is liable to put your butt in jail and is not recommended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justfine Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 Self defense courses are also taught in a controlled environment. It's not like they hire real muggers to attack people with 100% force. Females (unless butch) are better off learning how to run fast. Otherwise do muay thai and mma for 3 years then it might help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banglay Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 23 minutes ago, norrska said: Some of what you write is true and the rest is pure bs. Humans beings aren't animals and can be taught specific techniques which along with instinct will help in self-defense. It is a first line visible deterrent against aggression, but will not work in all cases. It's a bit like locking your front door. It will keep out some of the riff raff, but a professional burglar will get past the defenses no matter what you have. However, I am interested in hearing about your dubious teaching method,which seems to rely on no techniques and only maternal instincts. A true martial artist will learn all the techniques and then forget them all as they are already committed to the body's memory and will present naturally when called upon. Bruce Lee called this the art of Unless you are a devout christian or a flat earther exponent..and totally disagree with Darwin theory of evolution I do believe human being are mammals and descended from the "Ape" which pretty much makes us an animal ....but having walked around Pattaya a few times and people watched their are quite a few people who have struggled to get passed the "Ape" stage .sometimes evaluation just gets stuck LOL 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norrska Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 47 minutes ago, banglay said: Unless you are a devout christian or a flat earther exponent..and totally disagree with Darwin theory of evolution I do believe human being are mammals and descended from the "Ape" which pretty much makes us an animal ....but having walked around Pattaya a few times and people watched their are quite a few people who have struggled to get passed the "Ape" stage .sometimes evaluation just gets stuck LOL In spite of your poor attempt at humor, I see no evidence that you have any real teaching experience of understanding of combat, as suspected. I would like to know how you were also taught your MMA (maternal martial anarchy) as well, since you must have learned in order to teach. The fact is that combat and self-defence can be taught. Militaries, police forces and warriors of all stripes can only perform under live conditions after extensive training. If they operated by instinct alone, it would be anarchy. Therefore, your instinct theory of maternal martial anarchy is dubunked...next! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banglay Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 45 minutes ago, norrska said: In spite of your poor attempt at humor, I see no evidence that you have any real teaching experience of understanding of combat, as suspected. I would like to know how you were also taught your MMA (maternal martial anarchy) as well, since you must have learned in order to teach. The fact is that combat and self-defence can be taught. Militaries, police forces and warriors of all stripes can only perform under live conditions after extensive training. If they operated by instinct alone, it would be anarchy. Therefore, your instinct theory of maternal martial anarchy is dubunked...next! Sorry ...I am not going to get in to a peeing competition here You are totally within your own right too having your own options as am I .........I will not and do not need to prove anything to a total stranger... and I also apologise for my poor attempt at humour ....... PS no reply or response needed or required please ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norrska Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 5 hours ago, banglay said: Sorry ...I am not going to get in to a peeing competition here You are totally within your own right too having your own options as am I .........I will not and do not need to prove anything to a total stranger... and I also apologise for my poor attempt at humour ....... PS no reply or response needed or required please ... Thanks for the direction, but I decide which posts I respond to or not respond to. BTW I notice that you failed to provide any of the requested info. in your digression. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norrska Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 6 hours ago, hyku1147 said: The context is females defending themselves. I think that a sucker punch/kick would be considered a criminal assault whether or not it was done by a male or female. Some females such as MMA fighters could inflict a potentially lethal blow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katia Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 4 hours ago, norrska said: I think that a sucker punch/kick would be considered a criminal assault whether or not it was done by a male or female. Some females such as MMA fighters could inflict a potentially lethal blow. You're missing the "self-defense" aspect here... Mind you, we're talking about Thailand, and possibly-foreigner females against possibly-Thai males, so how the law and courts will treat self-defense might not be so cut-and-dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norrska Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 7 minutes ago, Katia said: You're missing the "self-defense" aspect here... Mind you, we're talking about Thailand, and possibly-foreigner females against possibly-Thai males, so how the law and courts will treat self-defense might not be so cut-and-dry. A sucker punch by definition is not self-defense. It is an attack on someone. Here's a link if you don't believe me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucker_punch A sucker punch (American English) (also known as a coward punch, one-punch attack or king hit (Australian English); or cold-cock (American English)) is a punch made without warning or while the recipient is distracted, allowing no time for preparation or defense on the part of the recipient. It is often thrown from behind—such as in the 'knockout game'—although striking from behind is not a prerequisite for a sucker punch. The term is generally used in situations where the way in which the punch has been delivered is considered unfair or unethical, and is done using deception or distraction, hence the term 'sucker' used to refer to the victim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justfine Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 5 minutes ago, norrska said: A sucker punch by definition is not self-defense. It is an attack on someone. Here's a link if you don't believe me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucker_punch A sucker punch (American English) (also known as a coward punch, one-punch attack or king hit (Australian English); or cold-cock (American English)) is a punch made without warning or while the recipient is distracted, allowing no time for preparation or defense on the part of the recipient. It is often thrown from behind—such as in the 'knockout game'—although striking from behind is not a prerequisite for a sucker punch. The term is generally used in situations where the way in which the punch has been delivered is considered unfair or unethical, and is done using deception or distraction, hence the term 'sucker' used to refer to the victim No comparison between self defence and king hitting people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mogandave Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 I have never understood cold-cock to be synonymous with sucker-punch.I always thought cold-cock as a knock-out punch...”fair” or otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katia Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 (edited) 21 minutes ago, norrska said: A sucker punch by definition is not self-defense. It is an attack on someone. Here's a link if you don't believe me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucker_punch A sucker punch (American English) (also known as a coward punch, one-punch attack or king hit (Australian English); or cold-cock (American English)) is a punch made without warning or while the recipient is distracted, allowing no time for preparation or defense on the part of the recipient. It is often thrown from behind—such as in the 'knockout game'—although striking from behind is not a prerequisite for a sucker punch. The term is generally used in situations where the way in which the punch has been delivered is considered unfair or unethical, and is done using deception or distraction, hence the term 'sucker' used to refer to the victim Right, but why are we talking about this in a thread about self-defense? Sorry, wasn't clear about that. Edited May 24, 2018 by Katia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norrska Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 10 hours ago, Katia said: Right, but why are we talking about this in a thread about self-defense? Sorry, wasn't clear about that. Because one of the posters brought up a sucker punch/kick as a form of self-defense which it isn't! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norrska Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 11 hours ago, mogandave said: I have never understood cold-cock to be synonymous with sucker-punch. I always thought cold-cock as a knock-out punch...”fair” or otherwise. Yeah sounds about right, sounds like something from a bar-room brawl in one of those cheesy cowboy westerns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rimmer Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 Topic is asking about recommendations for a personal trainer Self defence - personal trainer (Pattaya) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now