Scott Posted October 7, 2018 Share Posted October 7, 2018 Post violating Fair Use Policy and using an unapproved source has been removed. Reply also removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
attrayant Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 On 10/7/2018 at 10:20 AM, ivor bigun said: if she was so affected by it why not report it,not wait until someone is famous to have a go . Kavanaugh was not "famous" when she reported it. In fact, he had not even been nominated yet when she reported it. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivor bigun Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 Kavanaugh was not "famous" when she reported it. In fact, he had not even been nominated yet when she reported it.May not have been "famous" but was rich and well known.Sent from my SM-A720F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
attrayant Posted October 9, 2018 Share Posted October 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, ivor bigun said: May not have been "famous" but was rich and well known. If true, then he has been "rich and well-known" for a long time. Ford did not wait until he suddenly became "rich and well-known" to speak up. Maybe you should go back and re-think your original question: "if she was so affected by it why not report it, not wait until someone is famous to have a go". 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post 55Jay Posted October 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted October 9, 2018 Another interesting statistic is 4 in 12 world news items on the TV front page, are still about this. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted October 10, 2018 Share Posted October 10, 2018 Off topic posts have been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayned Posted October 11, 2018 Share Posted October 11, 2018 After Kavanaugh was confirmed MCConnell mad a speech where he said that all of this nonsense would go away very soon, and it has. News coverage is now about the hurricane and Trump's political rally while it was happening and the resignation of Miki Haley! Kavanaugh who? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srinivas Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 Shannon Bream (@ShannonBream) Tweeted: BREAKING: This is quite a read. Woman who claimed Justice Kavanaugh raped her now admits they’ve never even met. She’s been referred to DOJ/FBI for investigation and could soon be in serious legal trouble. https://t.co/QhFXt9yhRn SHE MADE IT ALL UP. Oh what are the odds of this, lying leftist activist was decades older than Kavanaugh and have never met. pdf has her orginal letter too,quite a read. probably got paid too by the "any means necessary" team . Christine Ford next? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
727Sky Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 59 minutes ago, Srinivas said: Shannon Bream (@ShannonBream) Tweeted: BREAKING: This is quite a read. Woman who claimed Justice Kavanaugh raped her now admits they’ve never even met. She’s been referred to DOJ/FBI for investigation and could soon be in serious legal trouble. https://t.co/QhFXt9yhRn SHE MADE IT ALL UP. Oh what are the odds of this, lying leftist activist was decades older than Kavanaugh and have never met. pdf has her orginal letter too,quite a read. probably got paid too by the "any means necessary" team . Christine Ford next? I saw this earlier so thanks for posting. I hope they make an example of this low life so others will think twice. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chomper Higgot Posted November 3, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted November 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Srinivas said: Shannon Bream (@ShannonBream) Tweeted: BREAKING: This is quite a read. Woman who claimed Justice Kavanaugh raped her now admits they’ve never even met. She’s been referred to DOJ/FBI for investigation and could soon be in serious legal trouble. https://t.co/QhFXt9yhRn SHE MADE IT ALL UP. Oh what are the odds of this, lying leftist activist was decades older than Kavanaugh and have never met. pdf has her orginal letter too,quite a read. probably got paid too by the "any means necessary" team . Christine Ford next? The above has no coonection all to the allegations made by Dr Ford. However I agree a full criminal investigation by the FBI is the right response. I also look forward to a full criminal investigation by the FBI of Dr Ford’s allegations. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srinivas Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said: The above has no coonection all to the allegations made by Dr Ford. However I agree a full criminal investigation by the FBI is the right response. I also look forward to a full criminal investigation by the FBI of Dr Ford’s allegations. If you read the accusers letter, she mentions Dr.Ford. The connection is they both accused the same man, at about same time for same objective. Her claims were also used to bolster credibilty to Dr.Fords claims in the print, tv, and online media, social networks etc. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 38 minutes ago, Srinivas said: If you read the accusers letter, she mentions Dr.Ford. The connection is they both accused the same man, at about same time for same objective. Her claims were also used to bolster credibilty to Dr.Fords claims in the print, tv, and online media, social networks etc. You yourself just mentioned Dr Ford, are you connected? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Morch Posted November 3, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted November 3, 2018 One of them TVF things is posters subscribing (or pretending to subscribe, whatever...) to a "wait and see approach" - "we don't know all the facts", "let the investigation run its course", "innocent until found guilty" etc. This is often deployed in the face of mounting evidence unfavorable to posters' political views. It usually holds for about as long as it takes for some tidbit supporting their views - then it's straight back to making decisive assertions, laying blame and whatnot. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srinivas Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 15 minutes ago, Morch said: One of them TVF things is posters subscribing (or pretending to subscribe, whatever...) to a "wait and see approach" - "we don't know all the facts", "let the investigation run its course", "innocent until found guilty" etc. This is often deployed in the face of mounting evidence unfavorable to posters' political views. It usually holds for about as long as it takes for some tidbit supporting their views - then it's straight back to making decisive assertions, laying blame and whatnot. mountain of evidence in Fords case? lol more like zero presented. and minmizing it by saying its tidbit when it doesnt favor your views? classic projection from tds. This accuser confessed to making it all up. She further confessed to Committee investigators that (1) she “just wanted to get attention”; (2) “it was a tactic”; and (3) “that was just a ploy.” She told Committee investigators that she had called Congress multiple times during the Kavanaugh hearing process – including prior to the time Dr. Ford’s allegations surfaced – to oppose his nomination. Regarding the false sexual-assault 2 Senate Judiciary Committee Interview with Judge Kavanaugh 5-10 (Sept, 26, 2018). Available at: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/09.26.18 BMK Interview Transcript (Redacted).pd f. 3 Id. 4 Id. 5https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/judiciary-committee-releases-transcripts-of-kavanaugh- interviews 6 Email from Judy Munro-Leighton to Senate Judiciary Committee (Oct. 3, 2018), enclosed below. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morch Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 @Srinivas The usual kovfefe.... I haven't claimed that there was a "mountain of evidence", try reading my post again. Then consider it was a general comment, which also applies to the posts above. And thanks for making my point - apparently, it is quite alright to minimize certain things in the service of your agenda, but not the other way around. Similarly, guess all that nonsense about due processes, and waiting for investigations, legal procedures to end was just talk? Because, frankly, you could be counted upon to make this very argument the next time it is "called for". 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srinivas Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 29 minutes ago, Morch said: @Srinivas The usual kovfefe.... I haven't claimed that there was a "mountain of evidence", try reading my post again. Then consider it was a general comment, which also applies to the posts above. And thanks for making my point - apparently, it is quite alright to minimize certain things in the service of your agenda, but not the other way around. Similarly, guess all that nonsense about due processes, and waiting for investigations, legal procedures to end was just talk? Because, frankly, you could be counted upon to make this very argument the next time it is "called for". classic projection by the expected liberal npc after false accuser confessed. thx for the entertainment. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manarak Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Morch said: One of them TVF things is posters subscribing (or pretending to subscribe, whatever...) to a "wait and see approach" - "we don't know all the facts", "let the investigation run its course", "innocent until found guilty" etc. This is often deployed in the face of mounting evidence unfavorable to posters' political views. It usually holds for about as long as it takes for some tidbit supporting their views - then it's straight back to making decisive assertions, laying blame and whatnot. and the exact opposite attitude for posters of the opposing political camp... par for the course in politics. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 Troll post removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srinivas Posted November 4, 2018 Share Posted November 4, 2018 Very little coverage in the big news cartels but yahoo! wow https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaugh-accuser-admits-she-fabricated-184414094.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolboy Posted November 4, 2018 Share Posted November 4, 2018 1 minute ago, Srinivas said: Very little coverage in the big news cartels but yahoo! wow https://www.yahoo.com/news/kavanaugh-accuser-admits-she-fabricated-184414094.html Maybe because there was ?Very little coverage of her accusation in the big news cartels" in the first place? I don't recall ever seeing even a mention of her until Trump brought it up a few days ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srinivas Posted November 4, 2018 Share Posted November 4, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, bristolboy said: Maybe because there was ?Very little coverage of her accusation in the big news cartels" in the first place? I don't recall ever seeing even a mention of her until Trump brought it up a few days ago. ive read multiple accusers etc from friends watching avenati interviews saw one at one point he,said he had 3 more lined up Sen. Kamala Harris (CA)passed this one above on to the committee. Edited November 4, 2018 by Srinivas 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now