Jump to content








Fake social media accounts spread pro-Iran messages during U.S. midterms: FireEye


webfact

Recommended Posts

Fake social media accounts spread pro-Iran messages during U.S. midterms: FireEye

By Christopher Bing

 

2019-05-28T195538Z_1_LYNXNPEF4R1OI_RTROPTP_4_USA-IRAN-SANCTIONS.JPG

FILE PHOTO: A staff member removes the Iranian flag from the stage after a group picture with foreign ministers and representatives of the U.S., Iran, China, Russia, Britain, Germany, France and the European Union during Iran nuclear talks at the Vienna International Center in Vienna, Austria, July 14, 2015. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo

 

(Reuters) - A network of fake social media accounts impersonated political candidates and journalists to spread messages in support of Iran and against U.S. President Donald Trump around the 2018 congressional elections, cybersecurity firm FireEye said on Tuesday.

 

The findings show how unidentified, possibly government-backed, groups could manipulate social media platforms to promote stories and other content that can influence the opinions of American voters, the researchers said.

 

This particular operation was largely focused on promoting "anti-Saudi, anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian themes," according to the report by FireEye.

 

The campaign was organised through a series of fake personas that created various social media accounts, including on Twitter and Facebook. Most of these accounts were created last year and have since been taken down, the report said.

 

Spokespersons for Twitter and Facebook confirmed FireEye's finding that the fake accounts were created on their platforms.

 

Lee Foster, a researcher with FireEye, said he found some of the fake personas - often masquerading as American journalists - had successfully convinced several U.S. news outlets to publish letters to the editor, guest columns and blog posts.

 

These writings displayed both progressive and conservative views, the report said, covering topics including the Trump administration's designation of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization.

 

"We're assessing with low confidence that this network was organised to support Iranian political interests," said Foster. "However, we're not at the point where we can say who was doing it or where it's coming from. The investigation is ongoing."

 

Before the 2018 midterms election, the nameless group created Twitter accounts that also impersonated both Republican and Democratic congressional candidates. It is unclear if the fake accounts had any effect on their campaigns.

 

The imposter Twitter accounts often plagiarized messages from the politicians' legitimate accounts, but also mixed in posts voicing support for policies believed to be favourable to Tehran. Affected politicians included Jineea Butler, a Republican candidate for New York's 13th District, and Marla Livengood, a Republican candidate for California's 9th District. Both Livengood and Butler lost in the election.

 

Livengood's campaign called the situation "clearly an attempt by bad actors" to hurt her campaign, and noted that Livengood was "a strident opponent of nuclear weapons in Iran."

 

Butler could not be immediately reached for comment.

 

Twitter said in a statement that it had "removed this network of 2,800 inauthentic accounts originating in Iran at the beginning of May," adding that its investigation was ongoing.

 

Facebook said it had removed 51 Facebook accounts, 36 Pages, seven Groups and three Instagram accounts connected to the influence operation. Instagram is owned by Facebook.

 

The activity on Facebook was less expansive than that on Twitter and it appeared to be more narrowly focused, said Facebook head of cybersecurity policy Nathaniel Gleicher. The inauthentic Facebook accounts instead often privately messaged high profile figures, including journalists, policy-makers and Iranian dissidents, to promote certain issues.

 

Facebook also concluded the activity had originated in Iran.

 

(Reporting by Christopher Bing; editing by Rosalba O'Brien and Susan Thomas)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-05-29

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


what about fake anti-Iranian posts?  huh?


why not post positive stuff about our Number One best ally at the end of World War 2?  Iran.  with all those listening posts we had there, and then after the Dulles brothers got rid of their first democratically elected leader, who was a nationalist that wanted Iranians to be treated as.... humans.... by the British at their huge oil refinery in.... Iran..... we got them to buy tons and tons of American weapons.  what's not to say good about our friends?      

I like Iran.  and I am as red, white and blue as any damn other Amerikeen.  so come and get me!

Edited by WeekendRaider
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, WeekendRaider said:

what about fake anti-Iranian posts?  huh?


why not post positive stuff about our Number One best ally at the end of World War 2?  Iran.  with all those listening posts we had there, and then after the Dulles brothers got rid of their first democratically elected leader, who was a nationalist that wanted Iranians to be treated as.... humans.... by the British at their huge oil refinery in.... Iran..... we got them to buy tons and tons of American weapons.  what's not to say good about our friends?      

I like Iran.  and I am as red, white and blue as any damn other Amerikeen.  so come and get me!

They might be lovely people but I flat refuse to enter any country that has capital punishment for blasphemy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...