Jump to content

Why airport expansion?


Recommended Posts

I remember when Suvarnabhumi was built the government didn't know what to do with Don Mueang. Some thought it should be used for rice storage. Now it is bursting at the seams with travelers and the government wants the expansion of Suvarnabhumi expedited. But I keep hearing tourism is down. What's the explanation? Many more Thais traveling?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Air travel growth seems unstoppable.

And domestic has it's share.

When I first came to Thailand there were three flights daily to Khon Kaen with Thai Airways.

Price was about 2500 Baht in the mid 90s(!).

Nowadays it's six flights from BKK plus eleven flights from DMK with prices down to below 1000 Baht (in 2019!).

And that's just one provincial airport.

More and more Thai people can afford to fly and avoid the terrible bus trips.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling that all this building is just a means to ‘rip-off’ the government for more money. Same with all the new buildings in the university’s. Student numbers down but that doesn’t stop making the Uni’s bigger.
Like I say, just my take on it!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, KhunBENQ said:

Air travel growth seems unstoppable.

And domestic has it's share.

When I first came to Thailand there were three flights daily to Khon Kaen with Thai Airways.

Price was about 2500 Baht in the mid 90s(!).

Nowadays it's six flights from BKK plus eleven flights from DMK with prices down to below 1000 Baht (in 2019!).

And that's just one provincial airport.

More and more Thai people can afford to fly and avoid the terrible bus trips.

 

Most of the domestic flights are from DM. What's up with Suvarnabhumi? Let's ask Andrew Wiggens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And DMK is not domestic only :biggrin:

More like the low cost carrier hub.

 

48 minutes ago, tomazbodner said:

you have Bangkok Air, Thai Air and Thai Smile flying domestic from Swampy

And Thai Vietjet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, you have Bangkok Air, Thai Air and Thai Smile flying domestic from Swampy. Why else would they have Domestic Departures/Arrivals at the beginning of the airport?

Yes true, but those domestic lines are all part of an International company, unlike NOK Air, for instance.

I have flown to both, on domestic routes from Ubon many times.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DILLIGAD said:

Yes true, but those domestic lines are all part of an International company, unlike NOK Air, for instance.

I have flown to both, on domestic routes from Ubon many times.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Air Asia flies to other countries but is only in DM. DM does have international departure gates.

Maybe the domestic ones at Suvarnabhumi are owned by Thai companies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the time they'd finished haggling on who got what part of the construction & equipping cake and completed Suvarnabhumi it was a twenty year old design and already close to capacity. Soft spots on the tarmac, taxiways, and apron didn't help matters. That's why Don Muaeung was reinstated and the low cost carriers offloaded to the old airport. Thirteen years on, the airport is handling over 60m passengers per annum, though was designed for 45m. The original design included a series of expansion phases, both increasing the number of terminals and adding two more runways, to bring the capacity to 100m. These are the expansions that they now want expedited. Which brings us back to my first sentence.

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Stocky said:

By the time they'd finished haggling on who got what part of the construction & equipping cake and completed Suvarnabhumi it was a twenty year old design and already close to capacity. Soft spots on the tarmac, taxiways, and apron didn't help matters. That's why Don Muaeung was reinstated and the low cost carriers offloaded to the old airport. Thirteen years on, the airport is handling over 60m passengers per annum, though was designed for 45m. The original design included a series of expansion phases, both increasing the number of terminals and adding two more runways, to bring the capacity to 100m. These are the expansions that they now want expedited. Which brings us back to my first sentence.

 

.

Yes, problems from being built on a swamp. Was blamed on foreign engineers. My original question was why all the airport expansion when we hear tourism is down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you hear and what you read (on here and elsewhere) should be taken in context with who is providing the information and why a negative (or positive) slant is beneficial and why. IMO the translation of Thai to English seems to allow a lot of literary licence, enabling the distortion of facts in the favor of those manipulating the truth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, elgenon said:

My original question was why all the airport expansion when we hear tourism is down.

As I said it's running at overcapacity, that's reflected in problems from the poor air-conditioning to queues at immigration. But it's not only foreign tourists that use the airport, Thais are increasingly using the airport, both for domestic and foreign travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...